Bugs in the NRC's doctoral program evaluation data: From mites to hissing cockroaches

PS - Political Science and Politics

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 829-835

  Dometrius, Nelson C ^a   Hood III, M V ^a   Shirkey, Kurt A ^a   Kidd, Quentin ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032340665     PISSN: 10490965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1049096500053439     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. "Departmental Rankings: Much Ado About Something?" 1996. PS: Political Science and Politics 28(June): 144-48.
2. "Grad School Rankings Rankle." 1995. Science 269(September): 1660-62.
3. Jackman, Robert W., and Randolph M. Siverson. 1996. "Rating the Rating: An Analysis of the National Research Council's Appraisal of Political Science Ph.D. Programs." PS: Political Science and Politics 28(June): 155-60.
4. Katz, Richard, S., and Munroe Eagles. 1996. "Ranking Political Science Programs: A View from the Lower Half." PS: Political Science and Politics 28(June): 149-54.
5. Lowery, Robert C., and Brian D. Silver. 1996. "A Rising Tide Lifts All Boats: Political Science Department Reputation and the Reputation of the University." PS: Political Science and Politics 28(June): 161-67.
6. Miller, Arthur H., Charles Tien, and Andrew A. Peebler. 1996. "Department Rankings: An Alternative Approach." PS: Political Science and Politics 28(December): 704-17.
7. National Research Council. 1995. Research Doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
8. _. n.d. "Pub_cit.doc" 〈omputer file〉. On Research Doctorate Programs in the United States: Data Set 〈CD-ROM〉. Washington DC: National Academy Press.