Evaluating innovation: The case study approach

Studies in Educational Evaluation

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 25-43

  Sáez, María José ^a   Carretero, Antonio J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032337628     PISSN: 0191491X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0191-491X(98)00002-9     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bodgan, R.C., & Biklen, S.(1992). Qualitative research for education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
2. Carretero, A.J. (1995). La negociación en evaluación [Negotiation in evaluation]. In M.J. Sáez, (Ed.), Conceptualizando la evaluación en España [Conceptualizing evaluation in Spain] (pp. 27-36). ICE Univ. Alcalá de Henares.
3. Goetz, J.P., & LeCompte, M.D. (1984). Ethnographic and qualitative design in educational research. San Diego: Academic Press.
4. Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco. Jossey-Bass.
5. House, E. (1993). Professional evaluation, Social impact and political consequences. Newbury Park: Sage.
6. House, E. (1996). A framework for appraising educational reforms. Educational Researcher, 25 (7), 6-14.
7. Huberman, A.M., & Miles, M.B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln, (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
8. Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
9. McColskey, W., Parke, H.M., Harman, P., & Elliot, R.M. (1995). Evaluators as collaborators in science education reform. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 65, 71-92.
10. MacDonald, B. (1995). La evaluación como servicio público: perspectivas de futuro [Evaluation as a public service: A perspective for the future]. In M.J. Sáez (Ed.), Conceptualizando la evaluación en España [Conceptualizing evaluation in Spain] (pp. 15-24). ICE Univ. Alcalá de Henares.
11. MacDonald, B., & Stronach, I. (1989). The Independent Policy Evaluation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 5, 51-64.
12. Nevo, D. (1995). School-based evaluation: A dialogue for school improvement. Oxford: Pergamon.
13. O, Sullivan, R.G. (1995). From judges to collaborators: Evaluators, roles in science curriculum reform. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 65, 19-30.
14. Owe, J.M., & Lambert, F.C. (1995). Roles for evaluation in learning organizations. Evaluation, 1 (2), 237-250.
15. Ragin, C., & Becker, H. (1992). What is a case? The foundations of social inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Sáez M.J., & Carretero, A. (1994). El estudio de caso como metodología o la realidad a travésde un caleidoscopio [The case study methodology or looking at reality through a kaleidoscope]. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 20, 163-178.
17. Sáez M.J., & Carretero, A. (1995). Un modelo posible: la Evaluación en la España actual [Modern evaluation in Spain: A model]. In M.J. Sáez, Conceptualizando la evaluación en España [Conceptualizing evaluation in Spain] (pp. 131-142). ICE Univ. Alcalá de Henares.
18. Simons, H. (1996). Enfoque de estudios de casos en el proyecto SMT [The case study approach in the SMT Project]. Revista de Educación 310, 173-186.
19. Simons, H. (1997). La metodoliía de estudio de caso español en el proyecto de la OCDE [The methodology of the Spanish case study in the OECD Project]. Curriculum e innovación en la enseñania de las ciencias. INCE-MEC.
20. Stake, R. (1978). The case study method in social inquiry. Educational Researcher, 7, 5-8.
21. Stake, R. (1980). Program evaluation: The responsive evaluation model. In W.B. Dockrell, & D. Hamilton, (Eds.), Rethinking educational research. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
22. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. London: Sage.
23. Stake, R., & Easley, J.A. Jr. (Eds.) (1978). Case studies in science education. Urbana, CIRCE, University of Illinois.
24. Wells, A.S., Hirshberg, D., Lipton, M., & Oakes, J. (1995). Bounding the case within its context: A constructivist approach to studying detracking reform. Educational Researcher, 24 (5), 18-24.