A new primitive acanthomorph fish from the greenhorn formation (late cretaceous) of nebraska

Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 301-314

  Arratia, Gloria ^a   Chorn, John ^b  

^a LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTION AND BIODIVERSITY SCIENCE   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032336466     PISSN: 02724634     EISSN: 19372809     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724634.1998.10011058     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Arratia, G. 1996. Reassessment of the phylogenetic relationships of cer¬tain Jurassic teleosts and their implications on teleostean phylogeny; pp. 219-242 in G. Arratia and G. Viohl (eds.), Mesozoic Fishes-Systematics and Paleoecology. Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil. München, Germany
2. Arratia, G. 1997. Basal teleosts and teleostean phytogeny. Palaeo Ichthyologica 7:5-168
3. Bardack, D. 1965. New Upper Cretaceous teleost fish from Texas. Uni-versity of Kansas, Paleontological Contributions, Paper 1:1-19
4. Gaudant, M. 1978. Recherches sur I’anatomie et systématique des Cténothrissiformes et des Pattersonichthyiformes (poissons téléostéens) du Cénomanienne du Liban. Mémoires du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle. Sciences de la Terre, 41:1-124
5. Gayet, M. 1979. Sur les ptérotiques de certains poissons Eurypterygii et leur signification phylogénétique. Bulletin du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris (4) 1C:315-327
6. Gayet, M. 1980a. Recherches sur l’ichthyofaune cénomanienne des Monts de Judée: les “acanthoptérygiens”. Annales de Paléontologie (Ver-tébrés) 66:75-128
7. Gayet, M. 1980b. Contribution à l’étude anatomique et systématique des poissons cénomaniens du Liban, anciennement placés dans les acanthoptérygiens. Mémoires du Muséum national d’Histoire na-turelle, Sciences de la Terre, 44:1-149
8. Gayet, M. 1982. étude anatomique et systématique des acanthopterygians du Sénonien de Sahel-Alma (Liban). Palaeontographica Italiana 72: 98-136
9. Grande, L., and S. Chatarjee. 1987. New Cretaceous fish fossil from Seymour Island, Antartica Peninsula. Palaeontology 30:829-837
10. Greenwood, P. H., H. D. Rosen, S. H. Weitzman, and G. S. Myers. 1966. Phyletic studies of teleosteans fishes, with a provisional clas¬sification of living forms. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 131:339-456
11. Gosline, W. 1966. Comments on the classification of the percoid fishes. Pacific Science 20:409-418
12. Gosline, W. 1971. Functional Morphology and Classification of Teleostean Fishes. University of Hawai Press, Honolulu, 208 pp
13. Hartel, K. E., and Stiassny, M. L. J. 1986. The identification of larval Parasudis (Teleostei, Chlorophthalmidae); with notes on the anat-omy and relationships of aulopiform fishes. Breviora 487:1-23
14. Hattin, D. E. 1975. Stratigraphie and depositional environment of Greenhorn Limestone (Upper Cretaceous) of Kansas. Kansas Geo-logical Survey, Bulletin of the University of Kansas 209:1-128
15. Jordan, D. S. 1924. A collection of fossil fishes in the University of Kansas, from the Niobrara Formation of the Cretaceous. Kansas University Science Bulletin 15(2):219-245
16. Johnson, G. D. 1984. Percoidei: development and relationships; pp. 464-498 in H. G. Moser, W. J. Richards, D. M. Cohen, M. P. Fahay, A. W. Kendall, Jr., and S. L. Richardson (eds.). Ontogeny and Systematics of Fishes. American Society of Ichthyologists and Her¬petologists, Special Publication 1
17. Johnson, G. D. 1992. Monophyly of the euteleostean clades-Neoteleostei, Eurypterygii, and Ctenosquamata. Copeia 1992(1):8-25
18. Johnson, G. D. and C. Patterson. 1993. Percomorph phylogeny: a survey of acanthomorphs and a new proposal. Bulletin of Marine Science 52(1):554-626
19. Maisey, J. G., and S. Blum. 1991. Araripichthys Silva Santos, 1985; pp.208-215 in J. G. Maisey (ed.), Santana fossils: an Illustrated Atlas. TFH Publications, Neptune City, New Jersey
20. McAllister, D. E. 1968. Evolution of branchiostegals and classification of teleostome fishes. Bulletin of the National Museum of Canada (Biological Series) 77(221): 1-239
21. Otero, O., and M. Gayet. 1995. étude phylogénétique des aipichthyides, poissons téléostéens de la Téthys cénomanienne. Geobios, M.S., 19:221-224
22. Patterson, C. 1964. A review of Mesozoic acanthopterygian fishes, with special reference to those of the English Chalk. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 249:213-482
23. Patterson, C. 1967. New Cretaceous berycoid fishes from the Lebanon. Bul-letin of the British Museum of Natural History, Geology 14:67-110
24. Patterson, C. 1968. The caudal skeleton in lower liassic pholidophorid fishes. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology 16(5): 202-239
25. Patterson, C. 1993. An overview of the early fossil record of acanthomorphs. Bulletin of Marine Science 52(1):29-59
26. Patterson, C. and D. E. Rosen. 1977. Review of the ichthyodectiform and other Mesozoic teleost fishes and the theory and practice of clas-sifying fossils. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural His-tory 158:83-172
27. Roberts, C. D. 1993. Comparative morphology of spined scales and their phylogenetic significance in the Teleostei. Bulletin of Marine Science 52(1):60-113
28. Regan, C. T. 1907. On the anatomy, classification and systematic po-sition of the teleostean fishes of the sub-order Allotrignathi. Pro-ceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1907, 2:634-643
29. Rosen, D. E. 1973. Interrelationships of higher euteleostean fishes; pp. 397-513 in P. H. Greenwood, R. S. Miles, and C. Patterson (eds). Interrelationships of Fishes. Journal of the Linnean Society of Lon-don (Zoology) 53, Supplement 1, Academic Press, New York
30. Rosen, D. E 1985. An essay on euteleostean classification. American Museum Novitates 2827:1-57
31. Rosen, D. E and C. Patterson. 1969. The structure and relationships of the paracanthopterygian fishes. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 141(3):357-474
32. Santos, R. da Silva. 1985. Araripichthys castilhoi novo genero e especie de Teleostei da Formaçao Santana, Chapada do Araripe, Brasil. Série Geologia, Departamento Nacional da Produçao Mineral, Brasil 29:133-139
33. Schultze, H.-P, and G. Arratia. 1989. The composition of the caudal skeleton of teleosts (Actinopterygii: Osteichthyes). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 97:189-231
34. Starks, E. C. 1898. The osteology and relationships of the family Zeidae. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 21(1155): 469-476
35. Stewart, J. D. 1984. Taxonomy, paleoecology, and stratigraphy of the halecostome-inoceramid associations of the North American Upper Cretaceous epicontinental seaways. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 201 pp
36. Stewart, J. D. 1996. Cretaceous acanthomorphs of North America; pp. 383-394 in G. Arratia and G. Viohl (eds.), Mesozoic Fishes—Systematics and Paleoecology. Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil. München, Germany
37. Stiassny, M. L. J. 1986. The limits and relationships of the acanthomorph teleosts. Journal of Zoology, London (B) 1986:411-460
38. Stiassny, M. L. J. 1993. What are grey mullets? Bulletin of Marine Science 52(1): 197-219
39. Toombs, H. A., and A. E. Rixon. 1959. The use of acids in the prepa-ration of vertebrate fossils. Curator 2:304-312
40. Wilson, M. V. H., and A. Murray. 1996. Early Cenomanian acanthomorph teleost in the Cretaceous Fish Scale Zone, Albian/Ceno-manian boundary, Alberta, Canada, pp. 369-382 in G. Arratia and G. Viohl (eds.), Mesozoic Fishes—Systematics and Paleoecology. Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil. München, Germany