Ethics for the new surveillance

Information Society

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 171-185

  Marx, Gary T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Borders; Ethics; New information technologies; Privacy reasonable expectation of privacy; Surveillance

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032336129     PISSN: 01972243     EISSN: 10876537     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/019722498128809     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bennett, C. 1992. Regulating privacy: Data protection and public policy in Europe and the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
2. Bennett, C. 1995. Implementing privacy codes of practice: Areportto the Canadian Standards Association. Rexdale: CSA.
3. Bok, S. 1978. Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. New York: Pantheon.
4. Chandler, R. 1957. The big sleep. New York: Random House.
5. Clarke, R. 1988. Information technology and dataveillance. Communications of the ACM 31:29-45.
6. Delaware v Prouse, (1979).
7. Flaherty, D. 1989. Protecting privacy in surveillance societies. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
8. Foucault, M. 1977 Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison.
9. Gandy, O. 1993. The panoptic sort. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
10. Katz, J. 1983. “A theory of qualitative methodology: The social system of analytic fieldwork.” In Contemporary Field Research, ed. R. Emerson. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
11. Kennedy, C., and Alderman, E. 1995. The right to privacy. New York: Knopf.
12. Laudon, K. 1986. The dossier society: Value choices in the design of national information systems. New York: Columbia University Press.
13. Lyon, D. 1994. The electronic eye: The rise of the surveillance society. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
14. Lyon, D. 1996. Computers, surveillance and privacy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
15. Marx, G. 1988. Undercover: Police surveillance in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16. Marx, G. 1994.Newtelecommunicationtechnologiesrequirenewman-ners. Telecommunications Policy 18
17. Marx, G., and Reichman, N. 1984. “Routinizing the discovery of secrets: Computers as informants.” American Behavioral Scientist. 27:423-452.
18. Nissenbaum, H. 1997. “Toward an approachto privacy in public: Challenges of information technology.” Ethics and Behavior 7(3):207-219.
19. Olmsteadv United States, 277 U.S. 438, (1928).
20. Radin, M. J. 1996. Reinterpreting property. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Regan, P. 1995. Legislating privacy: Technology, social values, and public policy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
22. Rule, J. 1973. Private lives, public surveillance. London: Allen-Lane.
23. Smith, J. 1994. Managing privacy: Information technology and corporate America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
24. Smith, R. E. 1993. War Stories, Vol. I. Providence, RI: Privacy Journal.
25. Smith, R. E. 1997. War Stories, Vol. II. Providence, RI: Privacy Journal.
26. United States v Place, (1983).
27. Vrofsky, M., ed. 1987. The Douglas Letters. Bethesda, MD: Adler and Adler.
28. Winner, L. 1988. The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.