The Formal and Mental Structures of Semiotic Processes

Theory & Psychology

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 783-803

  Smythe, William E ^a   Chow, Siu L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGINA   (Canada)

Author keywords

emplotment; pragmatics; semiotic; sign; speech act

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032327727     PISSN: 09593543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0959354398086004     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Attridge, D.(1992). Introduction: Derrida and the questioning of literature. In D. Attridge (Ed.), Acts of literature (pp. 1-29). New York: Routledge.
2. Bower, G.H., Black, J.B., & Turner, T.J. (1979). Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 177-220.
3. Bruner, J.(1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Buczynsk-Garewica, H.(1979). Peirce's method of triadic analysis of signs. Semiotica, 26, 251-259.
5. Clark, H.H.(1979). Responding to indirect speech acts. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 430-477.
6. Derrida, J.(1976). Of grammatology (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
7. Derrida, J.(1991). Letter to a Japanese friend. In P. Kamuf (Ed.), A Derrida reader: Between the blinds (pp. 270-276). New York: Columbia University Press.
8. Eagleton, T.(1983). Literary theory: An introduction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9. Eco, U.(1976). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
10. Eco, U.(1984). Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
11. Eco, U.(1990). The limits of interpretation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
12. Gerrig, R.J.(1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13. Goodman, N.(1972). Seven strictures on similarity. In N. Goodman (Ed.), Problems and projects (pp. 437-446). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
14. Kerby, A.P.(1991). Narrative and the self. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
15. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T.A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
16. Moghaddam, F.M., & Harré, R. (1992). Rethinking the laboratory experiment. American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 22-38.
17. Osgood, C.E.(1952). The nature and measurement of meaning. Psychological Bulletin, 49, 197-237.
18. Peirce, C.S.(1955 a). Logic as semiotic: The theory of signs. In J. Buchler (Ed.), Philosophical writings of Peirce (pp. 98-119). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1897.)
19. Peirce, C.S.(1955 b). Pragmatism in retrospect: A last formulation. In J. Buchler (Ed.), Philosophical writings of Peirce (pp. 269-289). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1906.)
20. Peirce, C.S.(1965). Thirdness. In C. Hartshome & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 1, pp. 170-180). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Peirce, C.S.(1977). Letter of 12 Oct. 1904. In C. S. Hardwick (Ed.), Semiotics and significs: The correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby (p. 22-36). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
22. Peirce, C.S.(1984). On a new list of categories. In E. C. Moore (Ed.), Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A chronological edition (pp. 49-59). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (Original work published 1867.)
23. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
24. Quine, W. V. O.(1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Sarbin, T. R.(Ed.). (1986). Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct. New York: Praeger.
26. Savan, D.(1976). An introduction to CS. Peirce's semiotics (Part I). Unpublished manuscript, Toronto Semiotic Circle.
27. Sebeok, T.A.(1994). Signs: An introduction to semiotics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
28. Skinner, B.F.(1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Appleton-Century-Croft.
29. Slugoski, B.R., & Ginsburg, G.P. (1989). Ego identity and explanatory speech. In J. Shotter & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), Texts of identity (pp. 36-55). London: Sage.
30. Smythe, W.E.(1990). Wie sind symbole zu interpretieren? Reprasentation bei Frege und Peirce (J. Quantz & R. Posner, Trans.). Zeitschriftffir Semiotik, 12, 47-62.
31. Steele, R.S.(1986). Deconstructing histories: Toward a systematic criticism of psychological narrative. In T. R. Sarbin (Ed.), Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human conduct (pp. 256-275). New York: Praeger.
32. Strawson, P.F.(1966). Review of Wittgenstein's Philosophical investigations. Mind, 58, 70-99.
33. White, H.(1973). Metahistory: The historical imagination in nineteenth-century Europe. Baltimore, MD/London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
34. Wiley, R.(1994). The semiotic self. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.