Regulation of technology adoption when individuals pursue multiple utility

Journal of Socio-Economics

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 701-719

  Lynne, Gary D ^b   Casey, C Franklin ^a  

^a Northwest Economic Associates   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032325467     PISSN: 10535357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1053-5357(99)80004-3     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888-918.
2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
3. Bagozzi, R.P. (1984). Expectancy-value attitude models: An analysis of critical measurement issues. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 1, 295-310.
4. Casey, F. & Lynne, G.D. (1997). Factors affecting investment in drip irrigation technology: A multiple utility approach. ER 91-1. Gainesville, FL: Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida.
5. Coleman, J.S. (1987). Norms as social capital. In G. Radnitzky & P. Bernholz, Economic imperialism, the economic approach applied outside the field of economics (pp. 133-155). New York: Paragon House Publishers.
6. Elster, J. (1985, reprinted 1989). The multiple self. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Elster, J. (1989). Social norms and economic theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3, 99-117.
8. Etzioni, A. (1986). The case for a multiple-utility conception. Economics and Philosophy, 2, 159-183.
9. Etzioni, A. (1988). The moral dimension, toward a new economics. New York: The Free Press.
10. Feather, N.T. (Ed.) (1982). Expectations and actions: Expectancy-valence models in psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Hirschman, A.O. (1985). Against parsimony, three easy ways of complicating some categories of economic discourse. Economics and Philosophy, 1, 7-21.
12. Kalaitzandonakes, N.G. & Monson, M. (1994). An analysis of potential conservation effort of CRP participants in the state of Missouri: A latent variable approach. Journal of Agriculture and Applied Economics, 26, 200-208.
13. Lynne, G. D., Shonkwiler, J.S., & Rola, J.R. (1988). Attitudes and farmer conservation behavior. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70, 12-19.
14. Lynne, G. D., Shonkwiler, J.S., & Wilson, M.E. (1991). Water permitting behavior under the 1972 Florida water resources act. Land Economics, 67, 340-351.
15. Lynne, G.D. (1995). Modifying the neo-classical approach to technology adoption with behavioral science models. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 27 (1), 67-80.
16. Lynne, G. D., Casey, C.F., Hodges, A., & Rahmani, M. (1995). Conservation technology adoption behavior and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16, 581-598.
17. Maddala, G.S. (1983). Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
18. Raphael, D.D. & Macfie, A.L. (1976, reprinted 1982). Adam Smith, the theory of moral sentiments. Oxford: Clarendon Press (reprinted by Rose Printing Company, Tallahassee, Florida).
19. Sen, A.K. (1977). Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6, 317-344.
20. Sen, A.K. (1987). On ethics and economics. New York: Basil Blackwell.
21. Sen, A.K. (1988). Freedom of choice, concept and content. European Economic Review, 32, 269-294.
22. Simon, H. (1982). Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Steedman, I. & Krause, U. (1985, reprinted 1989). Goethe's Faust, Arrow's possibility theorem and the individual decision-taker. In J. Elster (Ed.), The multiple self (pp. 197-231). New York: Cambridge University Press.
24. Stewart, H. (1995). A critique of instrumental reason in economics. Economics and Philosophy, 11, 57-83.
25. Ullman-Margalit, E. (1977). The emergence of norms. New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Weaver, R.D. (1996). Prosocial behavior: Private contributions to agriculture's impact on the environment. Land Economics, 72, 231-247.