Intensive, detailed, exhaustive

Intelligence

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 283-290

  Bouchard Jr , Thomas J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032324573     PISSN: 01602896     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0160-2896(99)80012-9     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Barron, F., & Parisi, P. (1976). Twin resemblance in creativity and in esthetic and emotional expression. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellogiae, 25, 213-217.
2. Bouchard, T.J., Jr. (1996). Behavior genetic studies of intelligence, yesterday and today: The long journey from plausibility to proof - The Galton Lecture. Journal of Biosocial Science, 28, 527-555.
3. Bouchard, T.J., Jr., & McGue, M. (1981). Familial studies of intelligence: A review. Science. 212, 1055-1059.
4. Brand, C. (1996). The g factor: General intelligence and its implications. Chichester: Wiley.
5. Burks, B.S. (1928a). The relative influence of nature and nurture upon mental development: A comparative study of foster parent-offspring child resemblance and true parent-true child resemblance. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 27, 219-316.
6. Burks, B.S. (Ed.). (1928b). Statistical hazards in nature-nurture investigations. Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing Company.
7. Burks, B.S. (1938). On the relative contributions of nature and nurture to average groupdifferences in intelligence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 24, 276-282.
8. Dennett, D.C. (1995). Darwins' dangerous idea: Evolution and the meaning of life. New York: Simon and Schuster.
9. Ellis, L. (1994). Research methods in the social sciences. Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark.
10. Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L., & Jarvik, L.F. (1963). Genetics and intelligence: A review. Science, 142, 1477-1479.
11. Freeman, D. (1983). Margaret Mead and Samoa: The making and unmaking of an anthropological myth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
12. Freeman, D. (1991). There's trick i' th' world: An historical analysis of the Samoan research of Margaret Mead. Visual Anthropology Review, 7, 103-128.
13. Freeman, D. (1992). Paradigms in collision: The far-reaching controversy over the Samoan researches of Margaret Mead and it significance for the human sciences. In Public Lecture, October 23, 1991, Australian National University: Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.
14. Fuller, J.L., & Thompson, W.R. (1960). Behavior genetics. Wiley: New York.
15. Hart, B., & Risley, T.R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Paul H. Brooks: Baltimore.
16. Heber, R.F., Dever, R., & Conroy, J. (1968). The influence of environmental and genetic variables on intellectual development. In H.J. Prehm, L.A. Hamerlynch, & J.E. Crosson (Eds.), Behavioral research in mental retardation (pp. 1-23). Eugene, OR: Rehabilitation Research and Training Center in Mental Retardation.
17. Heron, W.T. (1935). The inheritance of maze learning ability in rats. Journal of Comparative Psvchology, 19, 77-89.
18. Heron, W.T., & Skinner, B.F. (1940). The rate of extinction in maze-bright and maze-dull rats. Psychological Record, 4, 11-18.
19. Hunt, J.M. (1961). Intelligence and experience. New York: Ronald Press.
20. Jensen, A.R. (1969). How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement? Harvard Educational Review, 39, 1-123.
21. Jensen, A.R. (1972). Genetics and education. New York: Harper & Row.
22. Jensen, A.R. (1978). Genetic and behavioral effects of nonrandom mating. In R.T. Osborne, C.E. Noble, & N. Weyl (Eds.), Human variation: The biopsychology of age, race, and sex. New York: Academic Press.
23. Jensen, A.R. (1980a). Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.
24. Jensen, A.R. ( 1980b). Precis of Bias in mental testing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 325-333.
25. Jensen, A.R. (1982). The debunking of scientific fossils and straw persons. Review of the missmeasure of man. Contemporary Education Review, 1, 121-135.
26. Jensen, A.R. (1997). Eysenck as teacher and mentor. In H. Nyborg (Eds.), The scientific study of human nature: Tribute to Hans J. Eysenck at eighty (pp. 543-559). New York: Pergamon.
27. Jensen, A.R., & Rohwer, W.D., Jr. (1966). The Stroop Color-Word Test: A review. Acta Psychologica, 25, 36-93.
28. Kamin, L.J. (1974). The science and politics of IQ. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
29. Kamin, L.J. (1975). Review of Genetics and Education and Educability and Group Differences. Contemporary Psychology, 20, 545-547.
30. Lamb, K. (1997). IQ and PC. National Review, 49, 39-42.
31. Lewontin, R.C., Rose, S., & Kamin, L.J. (1984). Not in our genes: Biology ideology, and human nature. Pantheon: New York.
32. Locurto, C. (1991). Sense and nonsense about IQ: The case for uniqueness. New York: Praeger.
33. McClearn, G.E. (1962). The inheritance of behavior. In L. Postman (Eds.), Psychology in the making: Histories of selected research problems (pp. 144-252). New York: Alfred A Knopf.
34. Meehl, P.E. (1970). Nuisance variables and the ex post facto design. In M. Radner & S. Winokur (Eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science IV. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
35. Meehl, P.E. (1971). High school yearbooks: A reply to Schwarz. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77, 143-148.
36. Meehl, P.E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806-834.
37. Nelkin, D., & Lindee, M.S. (1995). The DNA mystique: The gene as a cultural icon. New York: Freeman.
38. Plomin, R. (1994). The nature of nurture: The environment beyond the family. In R. Plomin (Eds.), Genetics and experience: The interplay between nature and nurture (pp. 82-101). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
39. Rushton, J.P. (1997). Race, intelligence, and the brain: The errors and omissions of the 'revised' edition of S.J. Gould's The missmeasure of man (1996). Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 169-180.
40. Scarr, S. (1981). Race, social class and individual differences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
41. Scarr, S. (1987). Three cheers for Behavior Genetics: Winning the war and losing our identity. Behavior Genetics, 17, 219-228.
42. Scarr, S. (1992). Developmental theories for the 1990's: Development and individual differences. Child Development, 63, 1-19.
43. Scarr, S. (1997). Behavior genetic and socialization theories of intelligence: Truce and reconciliation. In R.J. Sternberg & E.L. Grigorenko (Eds.), Intelligence: Heredity and environment (pp. 3-41). New York: Cambridge University Press.
44. Scarr, S., & Weinberg, R.A. (1978). The influence of family background on intellectual attainment. American Sociological Review, 43, 674-692.
45. Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man: Their nature and measurement. New York: Macmillan.
46. Tolman, E.C. (1924). The inheritance of maze-learning ability in rats. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 4, 1-18.
47. Tolman, E.C., Tryon, R.C., & Jeffress, L.A. (1929). A self-recording maze with an automatic delivery table. University of California Publications in Psychology, 4, 99-112.
48. UPI (March 13, 1997). Clinton announces brain conference.
49. Wilson, E.O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Knopf.