Expert agreement in judging art projects - A myth or reality?

Studies in Educational Evaluation

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 385-404

  Karpati A ^a   Zempleni A ^a   Verhelst, N D ^c   Velduijzen, N H ^c   Schonau D W ^b  

^a EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^b Cito group   (Netherlands)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032324529     PISSN: 0191491X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0191-491X(98)00023-6     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Gardner, H. (1993). Assessment in context: The alternative to standardized testing. In B. R. Gifford & M. C. O'Connor (Eds.), Future assessments: Changing views of aptitude, achievement and instruction (pp. 32-46). Boston: Kluwer.
2. Gifi, A. (1990). Nonlinear multivariate statistics. Chicester: Wiley.
3. Kárpáti, A. (1995). Assessment of art education in Hungary: Historical problems in contemporary perspective. Journal of Art and Design Education, 3, 277-288.
4. Kárpáti, A., & Gaul, E. (1997). Episodes from the social history of Hungarian art education from an international perspective. In Proceedings of the Penn State History of Art Education Symposium, October 1995. State College: The Pennsylvania State University.
5. Kárpáti, A., & Schönau, D. (1997). Examining the Dutch and Hungarian final examination system in art. Journal of Multicultural and Cross-Cultural Research in Art. Fall, 91-102.
6. Kindler, Anna M. (Ed.) (1997). Child development in art. Reston: National Association of Art Education (NAEA).
7. Schönau, D.W. (1994). Final examinations in the visual arts in the Netherlands. Art Education, March, 34-39.
8. Zarándy, Z. (Ed.) (1996). A guide to the Hungarian national core curriculum (in English and German). Budapest: Hungarian Ministry of Culture and Education.