Tilt model of inverted amphiphilic mesophases

European Physical Journal B

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 519-528

  Hamm, M ^a   Kozlov, M M ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

68.10. m Fluid surfaces and fluid fluid interfaces; 68.10.Et Interface elasticity, viscosity, and viscoelasticity; 87.22.Bt Membrane and subcellular physics and structure

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; LIQUID MEMBRANES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MICELLES; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; MONOLAYERS; PHASE DIAGRAMS; VISCOELASTICITY; X RAY DIFFRACTION ANALYSIS;

BENDING ENERGY; ELASTIC CONSTANTS; TILT MODEL;

PHASE INTERFACES;

EID: 0032319375     PISSN: 14346028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s100510050579     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. V. Luzzati, in Biological membranes, edited by D. Chapman, (Academic Press, 1968), Vol. 1, pp.71-123.
2. J.M. Seddon, N. Zeb, R.H. Templer, R.N. McElhaney, D.A. Mannock, Langmuir 12, 5250 (1996).
3. M.A. Spivak, Comprehensive Introduction to Differential Geometry (Perish. Wilmington, DE, 1979).
4. B. Pansu, E. Dubois-Violette, Coll. Phys. C7, 281 (1990)
5. S.A. Safran, L.A. Turkevich, P. Pincus, J. Phys. France 45, L-69 (1984).
6. M.M. Kozlov, V.S. Markin, Biofizika 28, 255 (1983).
7. D.P. Siegel, R.M. Epand, Biophys. J. 73, 3089 (1997).
8. D.P. Siegel, Biophys. J. 65, 2124 (1993).
9. J.M. Seddon, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1031, 1 (1990).
10. W. Helfrich, Z. Naturforsch. 28 c, 693 (1973).
11. S.M. Gruner, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82, 3665 (1985).
12. A. Ben-Shaul, in Handbook of Biological Physics, edited by R. Lipowsky, E. Sackmann (Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam, 1995), p. 359.
13. J.N. Israelachvili, Intermolecular and surface forces, 2nd ed. (Academic Press Inc., London, LTD., 1985)
14. D.A. Anderson, S.M. Gruner, S. Leibler, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 5364 (1988).
15. G.L. Kirk, S.M. Gruner, D.E. Stein, Biochemistry 23, 1093 (1984).
16. M.W. Tate, S.M. Gruner, Biochemistry 28, 4245 (1989).
17. P.M. Duesing, R.H. Templer, J.M. Seddon, Langmuir 13, 351 (1997).
18. S. May, A. Ben-Shaul, Biophys. J. 73, 2427 (1997).
19. M.M. Kozlov, S. Leikin, R.P. Rand, Biophys. J. 67, 1603 (1994).
20. M.W Matsen, F.S. Bates, Macromol. 29, 7641 (1996).
21. M.W. Matsen, M. Schick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2660 (1994); S.P. Gido, D.W. Schwark, E.L. Thomas, Macromol. 26, 2636 (1993).
22. M.W. Matsen, M. Schick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2660 (1994); S.P. Gido, D.W. Schwark, E.L. Thomas, Macromol. 26, 2636 (1993).
23. G.H. Fredrickson, E. Helfand, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 697 (1987).
24. M. Hamm, M.M. Kozlov, (submitted).
25. D.C. Turner, S.M. Gruner, Biochemistry 31, 1340 (1992).
26. V. Luzzati, R. Vargas, A. Gulik, P. Mariani, J.M. Seddon, E. Rivas, Biochemistry 31, 279 (1992).
27. R.P. Rand, N.L. Fuller, Biophys. J. 66, 2127 (1994).
28. J.W. Gibbs, On the Equilibrium of Heterogeneous Substances. 1876/1878 in: The Collected Works of J. Willard Gibbs (New Haven, Yale University Press, 1948), Vol. 1.
29. S. Leikin, M.M. Kozlov, N.L. Fuller, R.P. Rand, Biophys. J. 71, 2623 (1996).
30. F.C. Frank, Discuss. Faraday. Soc. 25, 19 (1958).
31. C.-M. Chen, T.C. Lubensky, F.C. MacKintosh, Phys. Rev. E 51, 504 (1995).
32. S.A. Safran, Statistical thermodynamics of surfaces, interfaces, and membranes (Addison-Wesley, 1994).
33. It should be noted, however, that in lattices of more complicated geometry, such as bcc or Fd3m where a unit cell consists of cassettes of different shapes, the bending contribution to the energy proves to be different from that of bcc and fcc in spite of the similar topology. The corresponding calculations go beyond the purposes of this study and will be published elsewhere.
34. This reasoning can not be extended straightforwardly to the lattices whose unit cells involve cassettes of different shapes.
35. S. Alexander, J. McTague, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 702 (1978).
36. S. Alexander, J. Phys. France Colloq. 46, C3-33 (1985).
37. D. Hone, J. Phys. France Colloq. 46, C3-21 (1985).
38. Our model results in the energy of the bcc phase slightly higher than that of the fcc phase (the result not shown). This is of interest in the light of discussion of relationship between the fcc and bcc phases in colloidal crystals [33], [J. Phys. France Colloq. C3, suppl. N3, Vol. 46, 1985] and deserves further analysis we plan to present elsewhere.
39. I. Szleifer, D. Kramer, A. Ben-Shaul, W.M. Gelbart, S.A. Safran, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 6800 (1990).