Conjunctive interpretation of core and log data through association of the effective and total porosity models

Geological Society Special Publication

Volumn 136, Issue , 1998, Pages 213-223

  Worthington, P F ^a  

^a Cline and Associates   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORE LOGGING; DATA INTERPRETATION; HYDROCARBON RESERVOIR; PHYSICAL PROPERTY; POROSITY;

GOES;

EID: 0032318855     PISSN: 03058719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.136.01.18     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. ARCHIE, G. E. 1942. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics. Trans. AIME 146, 54-62
2. . BARDON, C. & PIED, B. 1969. Formation water saturation in shaly sands. Trans. SPWLA 10th Ann. Logging Symp., Z1-19, Society of Professional Well Log Analysts, Houston, Texas.
3. BUSH, D. C. & JENKINS. R. E. 1970. Proper hydration of clays for rock property determinations. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 22, 800-804.
4. CLAVIER, C., COATES. G & DUMANOIR, J. 1984. Theoretical and experimental bases for the dual-water model for interpretation of shaly sands. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 24, 153-167.
5. v and other formation properties. The Log Analyst 20(3), 3-19.
6. HURST, A. & NADEAU, P. 1994. Estimation of water saturation from clay microporosity data. SPE Paper 28850. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, Texas.
7. JOHNSON, W. L. & LINKE, W. A. 1977. Some practical applications to improve formation evaluation of sandstones in the Mackenzie Delta. Trans. CWLS 6th Formation Evaluation Symposium, R1-32, Canadian Well Logging Society, Calgary, Alberta.
8. v and formation-water salinity in the evaluation of shaly formations. Trans SPWLA 20th Ann. Logging Symp., AA1-26, Society of Professional Well Log Analysts, Houston, Texas.
9. v - the key to shaly sand evaluation using the Waxman-Smits equation in the absence of core data. Trans. SPWLA 22nd Ann. Logging Symp., Z1-36, Society of Professional Well Log Analysts, Houston, Texas.
10. MAYER, C. & SIBBIT, A. 1980. GLOBAL, a new approach to computer-processed log interpretation. SPE Paper 9341, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, Texas.
11. PALLATT, N. & THORNLEY, D. 1990. The role of bound water and capillary water in the evaluation of porosity in reservoir rocks. In: WORTHINGTON, P. F. (ed.) Advances in Core Evaluation, Gordon and Breach, Reading, 223-237.
12. RAIGA-CLEMENCEAU, J., FRAISSE, C. & GROSJEAN, Y. 1984. The dual-porosity model, a newly developed interpretation method for shaly sands. Trans. SPWLA 25th Ann. Logging Symp., F1-16, Society of Professional Well Log Analysts, Houston, Texas.
13. RUHOVETS, N. & FERTL, W H. 1982. Digital shaly-sand analysis based on Waxman-Smits model and log-derived clay typing. The Log Analyst 23(3), 7-23.
14. WAXMAN, M. H. & SMITS, L. J. M. 1968. Electrical conductivities in oil-bearing shaly sands. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 8, 107-122.
15. WORTHINGTON, P. F. 1991. The direction of petrophysics: a five-year perspective. The Log Analyst 32(2), 57-62.