Contrast sensitivity after extracapsular and intracapsular cataract extraction

Documenta Ophthalmologica

Volumn 95, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 121-131

  Mela, Ephigenia K ^a,b   Koliopoulos, John X ^a   Pharmakakis, Nikolaos M ^a   Gartaganis, Sotirios P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PATRAS   (Greece)

^b NONE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Cataract surgery; Contrast sensitivity; Intraocular lens

Indexed keywords

POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE);

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CATARACT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTRACAPSULAR CATARACT EXTRACTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRACAPSULAR CATARACT EXTRACTION; LENS CAPSULE; LENS IMPLANT; LENS IMPLANTATION; MALE; POSTERIOR EYE CHAMBER; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL ACUITY;

AGED; CAPSULORHEXIS; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LASER SURGERY; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; PSEUDOPHAKIA;

EID: 0032317223     PISSN: 00124486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1001750105995     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Anderson S, Holliday I. Night driving: effects of glare from vehicle headlights on motion perception. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995; 14: 545-51.
2. Lowe K, Barrett G. A comparison of visual function with PMMA and Poly HEMA intraocular lenses. Eur J Implant Ref Surg. 1995; 7: 271-4.
3. Mela E, Gartaganis S, Koliopoulos J. Contrast sensitivity function after cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation. Doc Ophthalmol. 1996; 92: 79-91.
4. Furuskog P, Nilsson B. Contrast sensitivity in patients with posterior chamber intraocular lens implants. Acta Ophthalmologica. 1988; 66: 438-44.
5. Miyajima H. Studies on contrast visual acuities in normal, cataractous and pseudophakic eyes. Keio J Med. 1992; 41: 212-20.
6. Hejcmanova D, Peregrin J, Sverak J, Hartmann M. Contrast sensitivity in aphakia and artiphakia. Cesk Oftalmol. 1991; 47: 138-43.
7. Allen E, Burton R, Webber S, Haaskjold E, Sandvig K, Jyrkkio H, Leite E, Nystrom A, Wollensak J. Comparison of a diffractive bifocal and a monofocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996; 22: 446-51.
8. Knorz M, Koch D, Martinez- Franco C, Loger C. Effect of pupil size and astigmatism on contrast acuity with monofocal and bifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1994; 20: 26-33.
9. Knorz M. A theoretical model to predict contrast sensitivity with bifocal intraocular lenses. Ger J Ophthalmol. 1994; 3: 189-94.
10. Munton G. Bifocal intraocular lenses. Review article. Br J Ophthalmol. 1991; 75: 367.
11. Vaquero M, Encinas J, Jimeney F. Visual function with monofocal versus multifocal IOLs. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996; 22: 1222-5.
12. Winther-Nielsen A, Gyldenkerne G, Corydon L. Contrast sensitivity, glare, and visual function: diffractive multifocal versus bilateral monofocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1995; 21: 202-7.
13. Rosseti L, Carraro F, Rovati M, Orzalesi N. Performance of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses in extracapsular cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1994; 20: 124-8.
14. Williamson W, Poirier L, Coulon P, Verin P. Compared optical performances of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses (contrast sensitivity and dynamic visual acuity). Br J Ophthalmol. 1994; 78: 249-51.
15. Eisenmann D, Hessemer V, Manzke B, Stork W, Jacobi K. Modulation transfer function and contrast sensitivity of refractive multi-zone multi-focal lenses. Ophthalmologe. 1993; 90: 343-7.
16. Lindstrom R. Food and Drug Administration study update. One-year results from 671 patients with the 3M multifocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology. 1993; 100: 91-7.
17. Akutsu H, Legge G, Showalter M, Lindstrom R, Zabel R, Kirby V. Contrast sensitivity and reading through multifocal intraocular lenses. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992; 110: 1076-80.
18. Lowe K, Easty D. A comparison of 141 polymacon (Iogel) and 140 poly (methyl methacrylate) intraocular lens implants. Br J Ophthalmol. 1992; 76: 88-90.
19. Gimenez J, Palomar A, Pinero A, Clement E, Broto M. Contrast vision in patients with aphakia and pseudophakia. J Fr Ophthalmol. 1992; 15: 177-83.
20. Jacobi F, Kohnen T, Dick B. Contrast sensitivity and glare disability in different IOL types after clear-corneal cataract surgery. Eur J Implant Ref Surg. 1995; 7: 214-8.
21. Knorz M, Lang A, Hsia T, Poepel B, Seiberth V, Liesenhoff H. Comparison of the optical and visual quality of the poly (methyl methacrylate) and silicone intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993; 19: 766-71.
22. Weghaupt H, Menapace R, Wedrich A. Functional vision with hydrogel versus PMMA lens implants. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1993; 231: 449-52.
23. Nadler D, Jaffe N, Clayman H, Jaffe M, Luscombe S. Glare disability in eyes with intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol 1984; 97: 43-7.
24. Wilkins M, McPherson R, Fergusson V. Visual recovery under glare conditions following laser capsulotomy. Eye 1996; 0: 117-20.
25. Knighton R, Slomovic A, Parrish R. Glare measurements before and after neodymium - YAG laser posterior capsulotomy. Am J Ophthalmol 1985; 100: 708-13.
26. Shokoohi K, Zwas F, Shin D, Paslawski D. Contrast sensitivity measurements in patients with chronic open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. ARVO abstracts, 1994; 35: 4314-84.
27. Lasa M, Datiles M, Podgor M, Magno B. Contrast and glare sensitivity. Association with the type and severity of the cataract. Ophthalmology. 1992; 99: 1045-9.
28. Abrahamsson M, Sjostrand J. Contrast sensitivity and acuity relationship in strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 1988; 72: 44-9.
29. Trobe J, Beck R, Moke P, Cleary P. Contrast sensitivity andother vision tests in the optic neuritis treatment trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996; 121: 547-53.
30. Bresnick GH. Diabetic retinopathy viewed as a neurosensory disorder. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986; 104: 989-90.
31. Binkhorst R. The optical design of intraocular lens implants, Ophthalmic Surg 1975; 6: 17.
32. Lakshminarayanan V, Lang A, Portney V. The 'Expected Visual Outcome' (EVO) model: methodology and clinical validation. Optom Vis Sci. 1995; 72: 511-21.