Uncertainty propagation within an integrated model of climate change

Energy Economics

Volumn 20, Issue 5-6, 1998, Pages 571-598

  Zapert, R ^a   Gaertner, P S ^b   Filar, J A ^b  

^a Emergent Solutions Coopers L   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Computational techniques; Integrated climate model; Stochastic dynamical systems

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; FORECASTING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; RANDOM PROCESSES;

ENVIRONMENTAL SCENARIO;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

EID: 0032311990     PISSN: 01409883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-9883(98)00014-0     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Braddock, R.D., Filar, J.A., Zapert, R., den Elzen, M.G., Rotmans, J., 1994. Mathematical formulation of the IMAGE greenhouse effect model. Appl. Mathem. Model. 18, 234-254.
2. Cess, R.D., Potter, C.G. Blanchet J.P. et al. 1989. Interpretation of cloud-climate feedback as produced by 14 atmospheric general circulation models. Science, 245, 513-516.
3. Curl, W.F., Ponnambalam, K., McBean, E.A., 1992. Uncertainty analysis in global carbon dioxide modeling. Dept. of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, N2L 3B8.
4. Gordon, A.H., 1992. The work intensity function in the detection of the greenhouse induced global temperature trends. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 45, 235-240.
5. Gordon, A.H., 1993. The random nature of drought: mathematical and physical causes. Int. J. Climatol. 13, 497-507.
6. Goudriaan, J., Ketner, P., 1984. A simulation study for the global carbon cycle including main impact on the biosphere. Clim. Change 6, 167-192.
7. Houghton, J.T., Jenkins, G.G., Ephraums, J.J., 1990. Climate Change: The IPCC scientific assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
8. IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1992. In: Houghton, J.T., Callander, B.A., Varney, S.K. (Eds.), Climate Change: The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment. Cambridge University Press.
9. Irving, A.D., 1992. Stochastic sensitivity analysis. Appl. Mathem. Model. 16, 3-15.
10. Kleijnen, J.P.C., 1993. Sensitivity Analysis Versus Uncertainty Analysis, When to Use What. Center and Department of Information Systems and Auditing, Tilburg University, The Netherlands.
11. 2 greehouse effect. Simulation 58, 410-417.
12. Kloeden, P.E., Platen, E., Schurz, H., 1993. Numerical solutions of SDE through computer experiments. Springer-Verlag, New York.
13. Rotmans, J., 1990. IMAGE: An Integrated Model to Assess the Greenhouse Effect. Ph.D. thesis, Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
14. Stowe, L.L., Carey, R.M., Pellegrino, P.P., 1992. Monitoring the mount Pinatubo aerosol layer with NOAA-11 AVHRR data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 159-162.
15. Woodward, W.A., Gray, H.L., 1993. Global warming and the problem of testing for trend in time series data. J. Clim. 6, 953-961.
16. 2 on the global mean temperature. Nature 315, 642-652.
17. Zapert, R., 1994. Uncertainty Analysis of Enhanced Greenhouse Effect Models. Ph.D. Thesis, Depart-ment of Mathematics, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Maryland, USA.