A numerical study of wave-function and matrix-element statistics in the Anderson model of localization

Annalen der Physik (Leipzig)

Volumn 7, Issue 5-6, 1998, Pages 437-441

  Uski, V ^a   Mehlig, B ^b   Romer R A ^a  

^a CHEMNITZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Disorder; Semiclassical approximation; Wave function statistics

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL OPERATORS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; STATISTICAL METHODS;

ANDERSON MODEL; MATRIX-ELEMENT STATISTICS; WAVE FUNCTION STATISTICS;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 0032309960     PISSN: 00033804     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3889(199811)7:5/6<437::AID-ANDP437>3.0.CO;2-Y     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. M. L. Mehta, Random Matrices and the Statistical Theory of Energy Levels, Academic Press, New York, 1991
2. K. B. Efetov, Supersymmetry in Disorder and Chaos, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997
3. C. E. Porter, in: Statistical Theories of Spectra, ed: C. E. Porter, Academic Press, New York, 1965
4. M. Wilkinson, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 20 (1987) 4215
5. B. Mehlig, N. Taniguchi, unpublished
6. N. Taniguchi, A. Hashimoto, B. D. Simons and B. L. Altshuler, Europhys. Lett. 27 (1994) 335
7. T.O. de Carvalho, J.P. Keating and J.M. Robbins, J. Phys. A 31 (1998) 5631
8. D. Braun and G. Montambaux, Phys. Rev. B 50 (1994) 7776
9. V. Uski, R. A. Römer, B. Mehlig and M. Schreiber, unpublished
10. V. I. Fal'ko and K. B. Efetov, Phys. Rev. B 50 (1994) 11627
11. A. D. Mirlin and Y. V. Fyodorov, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 26 (1993) L551
12. V. I. Fal'ko and K. B. Efetov, Europhys. Lett. (1995)
13. Y. V. Fyodorov and A. D. Mirlin, Phys. Rev. B 51 (1995) 13493
14. V. I. Fal'ko and K. B. Efetov, Phys. Rev. B 52 (1995) 17413
15. I. E. Smolyarenko and B. L. Altshuler, Phys. Rev. B 55 (1997) 10451
16. P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 109 (1958) 1492
17. J. Cullum and R. A. Willoughby, Lanczos Algorithms for Large Symmetric Eigenvalue Computations, Birkhäuser, Boston, 1985
18. It is assumed that the observable  does not commute with the Hamiltonian and has a well-defined classical limit A(r)
19. H = 2πh/Δ contribute, so that the diagonal approximation is valid