Learning probabilistic deformation models from image sequences

Signal Processing

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 155-171

  Kervrann, Charles ^a,b  

^a CAMPUS DE BEAULIEU   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Deformable models; Image sequence analysis; Learning; Markov models; Principal component analysis; Segmentation; Tracking

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; OPTIMIZATION; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

DEFORMABLE TEMPLATES;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

EID: 0032299505     PISSN: 01651684     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-1684(98)00142-X     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. T. Ahmad, C.J. Taylor, A. Lanitis, T.F. Cootes, Tracking and recognizing hand gestures, using statistical shape models, Image Vision Comput. 15 (1997) 345-352.
2. Y. Amit, U. Grenander, M. Piccioni, Structural image restoration through deformable templates, J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 86 (1991) 376-387.
3. A. Baumberg, D. Hogg, Learning flexible models from image sequences, in: Proc. European Conf. Computer Vision, Stockolm, 1994, pp. 299-308.
4. J. Besag, On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 48 (1986) 259-302.
5. M.A. Black, A.D. Jepson, Eigentracking: robust matching and tracking of articulated objects using a view-based representation, in: Proc. European Conf. Computer Vision, Cambridge, UK, April 1996, pp. 329-342.
6. A. Blake, R. Curwen, A. Zisserman, A framework for spatiotemporal control in the tracking of visual contours, Internat. J. Comput. Vision 11 (1993) 127-145.
7. A. Blake, M. Isard, D. Reynard, Learning to track the visual motion of contours, Artificial Intell. 78 (1995) 179-212.
8. P. Bouthemy, A. Benveniste, Modeling of atmospheric disturbances in meteorological pictures, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 6 (1984) 587-600.
9. T.F. Cootes, C.J. Taylor, Active shape models: smart snakes, in: Proc. British, Machine Vision Conf., Leeds, UK, September 1992, pp. 266-275.
10. T.F. Cootes, C.J. Taylor, Combining point distribution models with shape models based on finite element analysis, Image Vision Comput. 13 (1995) 403-409.
11. T.F. Cootes, C.J. Taylor, D.H. Cooper, J. Graham, Training models of shape from sets of examples, in: British, Machine Vision Conf., Leeds, UK, September 1992, pp. 9-18.
12. T.F. Cootes, C.J. Taylor, D.H. Cooper, J. Graham, Active shape models - their training and application, CVGIP: Image Understanding 61 (1994) 38-59.
13. G. Demoment, Image reconstruction and restoration: overview of common estimation structures and problems, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 37 (1989) 2024-2036.
14. G.W. Donohoe, D.R. Hush, N. Ahmed, Change detection for target detection and classification in video sequences, in: Proc. Internat. Conf. Acoust. Speech Signal Processing, New York, 1988, pp. 1084-1087.
15. N. Friedland, D. Adam, Automatic ventricular cavity boundary detection from sequential ultrasound images using simulated annealing, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 8 (1989) 344-353.
16. S. Geman, D. Geman, Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions and the Bayesian restoration of images, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 6 (1984) 721-741.
17. U. Grenander, Y. Chow, D.M. Keenan, Hands. A Pattern Theoretic Study of Biological Shapes, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1991.
18. U. Grenander, D.M. Keenan, Towards automated image understanding, J. Appl. Statist. 16 (1989) 207-221.
19. F. Heitz, P. Bouthemy, Multimodal estimation of discontinuous optical flow using Markov random fields, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 15 (1993) 1217-1232.
20. D.V. Hinkley, Inference about the change-point from cumulative sum-tests, Biometrika 58 (1971) 509-523.
21. M. Isard, A. Blake, Contour tracking by stochastic propagation of conditional density, in: Proc. European Conf. on Computer Vision, Cambridge, UK, April 1996, pp. 343-356.
22. M. Kass, A. Witkin, D. Terzopolous, Snakes: active contour models, in: Proc. Internat. Conf. Computer Vision, London, UK, 1987, pp. 259-268.
23. C. Kervrann, F. Heitz, A hierarchical statistical framework for the segmentation of deformable objects in image sequences, in: Proc. Conf. Comput. Vision Pattern Rec., Seattle, 1994, pp. 724-728.
24. C. Kervrann, F. Heitz, Learning structure and deformation modes of nonrigid objects in long image sequences, in: Proc. Internat. Workshop on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, Zurich, 1995, pp. 104-109.
25. C. Kervrann, F. Heitz, A Markov random field model-based approach to unsupervised texture segmentation using local and global spatial statistics, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 4 (1995) 856-862.
26. C. Kervrann, F. Heitz, Statistical model-based segmentation of deformable motion, in: Proc. Internat. Conf. Image Processing, Lausanne, 1996, Vol. I, pp. 937-940.
27. C. Kervrann, F. Heitz, A hierarchical markov modeling approach for the segmentation and tracking of deformable shapes, Graphical Models Image Process. 60 (1998) 173-195.
28. J. Martin, A. Pentland, R. Kikinis, Characterization of neuropathological shape deformations, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 20 (1998) 97-112.
29. T. McInerney, D. Terzopoulos, Deformable models in medical image analysis: a survey, Med. Image Anal. 2 (1996) 91-108.
30. A. Mohammad Djafari, On the estimation of hyper-parameters in Bayesian approach of solving inverse problems, in: Proc. Internat. Conf. Acoust. Speech Signal Processing, Minneapolis, 1993, pp. 495-498.
31. H. Murase, S.K. Nayar, Visual learning and recognition of 3D objects from appearance, Internat. J. Comput. Vision 14 (1995) 5-24.
32. C. Nastar, N. Ayache, Fast segmentation, tracking and analysis of deformable objects, in: Proc. Internat. Conf. Computer Vision, Berlin, 1993, pp. 275-279.
33. J.M. Odobez, P. Bouthemy, Detection of multiple objects using multiscale Markov random fields, with camera compensation, in: Proc. Internat. Conf. Image Processing, Austin, 1994, pp. 257-261.
34. E. Oja, Subspace Methods of Pattern Recognition, Research Studies Press, Hertfordshire, 1983.
35. V.I. Pavlovic, R. Sharma, T.S. Huang, Visual interpretation of hand gestures for human-computer interaction: a review, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 19 (1997) 677-695.
36. A. Pentland, S. Sclaroff, Closed-form solutions for physically based shape modeling and recognition, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 13 (1991) 715-729.
37. P. Perez, F. Heitz, Restriction of a Markov Random Field on a graph and multiresolution statistical image modeling, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 42 (1996) 180-190.
38. D. Reynard, A. Wildenberg, A. Blake, J. Marchant, Learning dynamics of complex motions from image sequences, in: Proc. European Conf. on Computer Vision, Cambridge, UK, April 1996, pp. 357-368.
39. L.H. Staib, J.S. Duncan, Boundary finding with parametrically deformable models, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 14 (1992) 1061-1075.
40. D. Terzopoulos, R. Szelisky, Tracking with Kalman snakes, in: A. Blake, A. Yuille (Eds.), Active Vision, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992, Chapter 1, pp. 3-20.
41. M. Turk, A. Pentland, Eigenfaces for recognition, J. Cognitive Neurosci. 3 (1991) 71-86.
42. A. Yuille, P.W. Hallinan, D.S. Cohen, Feature extraction from faces using deformable templates, in: Proc. Internat. J. Comput. Vision 8 (1992) 99-111.