Graph-theoretic representations for proximity matrices through strongly-anti-Robinson or circular strongly-anti-Robinson matrices

Psychometrika

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 341-358

  Hubert, Lawrence ^a   Arabie, Phipps ^b   Meulman, Jacqueline ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c University of Illinois ^*

Author keywords

Circular strongly anti Robinson; Graphical representation; Least squares matrix approximation; Strongly anti Robinson

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032282322     PISSN: 00333123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02294859     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Barthélemy, J.-P., & Guénoche, A. (1991). Trees and proximity representations. Chichester: Wiley.
2. Carroll, J. D. (1976). Spatial, nonspatial and hybrid models for scaling. Psychometrika, 41, 439-463.
3. Carroll, J. D., & Pruzansky, S. (1980). Discrete and hybrid scaling models. In E. D. Lantermann & H. Feger (Eds.), Similarity and choice (pp. 108-139). Bern: Huber.
4. Critchley, F. (1994). On exchangeability-based equivalence relations induced by strongly Robinson and, in particular, by quadripolar Robinson dissimilarity matrices. In B. van Cutsem (Ed.), Classification and dissimilarity analysis (Lecture notes in statistics, pp. 173-199). New York: Springer-Verlag.
5. Critchley, F., & Fichet, B. (1994). The partial order by inclusion of the principal classes of dissimilarity on a finite set, and some of their basic properties. In B. van Cutsem (Ed.), Classification and dissimilarity analysis (Lecture notes in statistics, pp. 5-65). New York: Springer-Verlag.
6. Durand, C., & Fichet, B. (1988). One-to-one correspondences in pyramidal representations: A unified approach. In H. H. Bock (Ed.), Classification and related methods of data analysis (pp. 85-90). Amsterdam: NorthHolland.
7. Dykstra, R. L. (1983). An algorithm for restricted least squares regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78, 837-842.
8. Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The radex. In P. F. Lazarsfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences (pp. 258-348). Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
9. Hubert, L. J., & Arabie, P. (1994). The analysis of proximity matrices through sums of matrices having (anti-)Robinson forms. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 47, 1-40.
10. Hubert, L. J., & Arabie, P. (1995). Iterative projection strategies for the least-squares fitting of tree structures to proximity data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 48, 281-317.
11. Hubert, L. J., Arabie, P., & Meulman, J. (1997). Linear and circular unidimensional scaling for symmetric proximity matrices. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 50, 253-284.
12. Mirkin, B. (1990). A sequential fitting procedure for linear data analysis models. Journal of Classification, 7, 167-195.
13. Mirkin, B. (1996). Mathematical classification and clustering. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
14. Robinson, W. S. (1951). A method for chronologically ordering archaeological deposits. American Antiquity, 16, 293-301.
15. Roux, M. (1988). Techniques of approximation for building two tree structures. In C. Hayashi, E. Diday, M. Jambu, and N. Ohsumi (Eds.), Recent developments in clustering and data analysis (pp. 151-170). New York: Academic Press.
16. Shepard, R. N., Kilpatric, D. W., & Cunningham, J. P. (1975). The internal representation of numbers. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 82-138.