메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 92, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 708-712

Court to court

(1)  Slaughter, Anne Marie a  

a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 0032281723     PISSN: 00029300     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2998135     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (26)

References (28)
  • 1
    • 27844461735 scopus 로고
    • Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. California
    • Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. California, 509 U.S. 764, 817 (1993). By contrast, legislative or "prescriptive comity" is "the respect sovereign nations afford each other by limiting the reach of their laws." Id.
    • (1993) U.S. , vol.509 , pp. 764
  • 3
    • 0347478397 scopus 로고
    • Howe v. Goldcorp Invs., Ltd., 1st Cir.
    • Howe v. Goldcorp Invs., Ltd., 946 F.2d 944, 950 (1st Cir. 1991).
    • (1991) F.2d , vol.946 , pp. 944
  • 4
    • 0346217212 scopus 로고
    • Roby v. Corporation of Lloyds, 2d Cir.
    • Roby v. Corporation of Lloyds, 996 F.2d 1353, 1363 (2d Cir. 1993) (citing Mitsubishi Motors v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, 473 U.S. 614 (1985)) .
    • (1993) F.2d , vol.996 , pp. 1353
  • 5
    • 84874354837 scopus 로고
    • citing Mitsubishi Motors v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth
    • Roby v. Corporation of Lloyds, 996 F.2d 1353, 1363 (2d Cir. 1993) (citing Mitsubishi Motors v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, 473 U.S. 614 (1985)) .
    • (1985) U.S. , vol.473 , pp. 614
  • 6
    • 0346217209 scopus 로고
    • Omron Healthcare Inc. v. MacLaren Exports Ltd., 7th Cir.
    • Omron Healthcare Inc. v. MacLaren Exports Ltd., 28 F.3d 600, 604 (7th Cir. 1994).
    • (1994) F.3d , vol.28 , pp. 600
  • 7
    • 84878063227 scopus 로고
    • 7th Cir.
    • 833 F.2d 680, 685 (7th Cir. 1987).
    • (1987) F.2d , vol.833 , pp. 680
  • 8
    • 77954121662 scopus 로고
    • Compare Dow Chem. Co. v. Castro Alfaro, Tex. (Doggett, J., concurring)
    • Compare Dow Chem. Co. v. Castro Alfaro, 786 S.W.2d 674, 687 (Tex. 1990) (Doggett, J., concurring) ("Comity - deference shown to the interests of the foreign forum . . . is best achieved by avoiding the possibility of incurring the wrath and the distrust of the Third World as it increasingly recognizes that it is being used as the industrial world's garbage can.") (internal quotation marks and citations omitted) with Sequihua v. Texaco, Inc., 847 F.Supp. 61, 63 (S.D. Tex. 1994) ("exercise of jurisdiction by this Court would interfere with Ecuador's sovereign right to control its own environment and resources"; the case should thus be dismissed on comity grounds).
    • (1990) S.W.2d , vol.786 , pp. 674
  • 9
    • 70349562448 scopus 로고
    • with Sequihua v. Texaco, Inc., S.D. Tex.
    • Compare Dow Chem. Co. v. Castro Alfaro, 786 S.W.2d 674, 687 (Tex. 1990) (Doggett, J., concurring) ("Comity - deference shown to the interests of the foreign forum . . . is best achieved by avoiding the possibility of incurring the wrath and the distrust of the Third World as it increasingly recognizes that it is being used as the industrial world's garbage can.") (internal quotation marks and citations omitted) with Sequihua v. Texaco, Inc., 847 F.Supp. 61, 63 (S.D. Tex. 1994) ("exercise of jurisdiction by this Court would interfere with Ecuador's sovereign right to control its own environment and resources"; the case should thus be dismissed on comity grounds).
    • (1994) F.Supp. , vol.847 , pp. 61
  • 10
    • 84857300572 scopus 로고
    • Gulf Oil Corp. v. Gilbert
    • Gulf Oil Corp. v. Gilbert, 330 U.S. 501, 509 (1947) (applying the forum non conveniens doctrine to dismiss a New York case in favor of a Virginia forum), quoted in Piper Aircraft v. Reyno, 454 U.S. 235, 241 (1981) (dismissing a case brought in the United States in favor of a Scottish forum).
    • (1947) U.S. , vol.330 , pp. 501
  • 11
    • 77951700133 scopus 로고
    • quoted in Piper Aircraft v. Reyno
    • Gulf Oil Corp. v. Gilbert, 330 U.S. 501, 509 (1947) (applying the forum non conveniens doctrine to dismiss a New York case in favor of a Virginia forum), quoted in Piper Aircraft v. Reyno, 454 U.S. 235, 241 (1981) (dismissing a case brought in the United States in favor of a Scottish forum).
    • (1981) U.S. , vol.454 , pp. 235
  • 12
    • 84878025283 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 833 F.2d at 685.
    • F.2d , vol.833 , pp. 685
  • 13
    • 33746022050 scopus 로고
    • The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.
    • The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 9 (1972).
    • (1972) U.S. , vol.407 , pp. 1
  • 14
    • 77956433521 scopus 로고
    • In re Application of Euromep, SA, 2d Cir.
    • In re Application of Euromep, SA, 51 F.3d 1095, 1101 (2d Cir. 1995).
    • (1995) F.3d , vol.51 , pp. 1095
  • 15
    • 0346847896 scopus 로고
    • South Carolina Ins. Co. v. Assurantie Maatschappij "De Zeven Provincien" NV, [1986]
    • South Carolina Ins. Co. v. Assurantie Maatschappij "De Zeven Provincien" NV, [1986] 3 W.L.R. 398 (1986), discussed and quoted in Euromep, 51 F.3d at 1100 n.3.
    • (1986) W.L.R. , vol.3 , pp. 398
  • 16
    • 0346847899 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • discussed and quoted in Euromep, n.3
    • South Carolina Ins. Co. v. Assurantie Maatschappij "De Zeven Provincien" NV, [1986] 3 W.L.R. 398 (1986), discussed and quoted in Euromep, 51 F.3d at 1100 n.3.
    • F.3d , vol.51 , pp. 1100
  • 17
    • 0346847899 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • n.3
    • 51 F.3d at 1100 n.3.
    • F.3d , vol.51 , pp. 1100
  • 18
    • 84897875913 scopus 로고
    • United States v. Then
    • United States v. Then, 56 F.3d 464, 468-69 (1995).
    • (1995) F.3d , vol.56 , pp. 464
  • 19
    • 0347478393 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Id. at 469
    • Id. at 469.
  • 20
    • 0347478392 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Id.
    • Id.
  • 21
    • 30744455891 scopus 로고
    • Thompson v. Oklahoma
    • Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815, 869 (1988).
    • (1988) U.S. , vol.487 , pp. 815
  • 22
    • 0039176703 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Id. at 2377 n.11
    • 117 S.Ct. 2365, 2405 (1997). Writing for the majority in the Printz case, Justice Scalia again rejected Justice Breyer's invitaton to make a comparative analysis, with the assertion that "such comparative analysis [is] inappropriate to the task of interpreting a constitution, though it was of course quite relevant to the task of writing one." Id. at 2377 n.11. On the other hand, in another case decided during the 1997 Term brought by several members of Congress challenging the line-item veto, Chief Justice Rehnquist pointed out that "[t]here would be nothing irrational about a system which granted standing [to legislators] in these case; some European constitutional courts operate under one or another variant of such a regime . . . . [although] it is obviously not the regime that has obtained under our Constitution to date."
    • (1997) S.Ct. , vol.117 , pp. 2365
  • 23
    • 0348108453 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Howell v. Raines
    • Howell v. Raines, 117 S.Ct. 2312, 2322 (1997).
    • (1997) S.Ct. , vol.117 , pp. 2312
  • 24
    • 0347776173 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Broadening our Horizons: Why American Judges and Lawyers Must Learn about Foreign Law
    • (Int'l Jud. Acad./ASIL), June
    • Sandra Day O'Connor, Broadening our Horizons: Why American Judges and Lawyers Must Learn about Foreign Law, INT'L JUD. OBSERVER (Int'l Jud. Acad./ASIL), June 1997, at 2 (article adapted from speech given by Justice O'Connor at the 1997 spring meeting of the American College of Trial Lawyers).
    • (1997) Int'l Jud. Observer , pp. 2
    • Day O'Connor, S.1
  • 25
    • 0041543546 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Justices See Joint Issues with the EU
    • July 8
    • Justices See Joint Issues with the EU, WASH. POST, July 8, 1998, at A24. The quote is from Justice O'Connor. Justice Breyer added the following comment: "Lawyers in America may cite an EU ruling to our court to further a point, and this increases the cross-fertilization of U.S.-EU legal ideas." Other members of the delegation included Chief Judge Richard Arnold of the Eighth Circuit and Texas Chief Justice Tom Philips. Press Briefing in Brussels, U.S. Justices Compare U.S., EU Judicial Systems (July 8, 1998) 〈http://pdq2.usia.gov/scripts/cqcgi.exe/@pdqtest1.env〉. Justice Anthony Kennedy was also present for the meeting with the members of the ECJ.
    • (1998) Wash. Post
  • 26
    • 0346847898 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Press Briefing in Brussels, supra note 20
    • Press Briefing in Brussels, supra note 20.
  • 27
    • 0348108458 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Id.
    • Id.
  • 28
    • 0346847889 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Case concerning the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (Para. v. U.S.) Provisional Measures paras. 31, 30, 38 Order of Apr. 9
    • In its indication of provisional measures, the Court itself noted the existence of a "dispute as to whether the relief sought by Paraguay is a remedy available under the Vienna Convention." It further recited the view of the United States that for it to order the remedy sought by Paraguay would put it "in a position of acting as a universal court of criminal appeal," and then concluded its recitations with the firm assertion that "the function of this Court is to resolve international legal disputes between States, inter alia when they arise out of the interpretation or application of international conventions, and not to act as a court of criminal appeal." Case concerning the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (Para. v. U.S.) Provisional Measures paras. 31, 30, 38 (Order of Apr. 9, 1998) 〈http://www.icj-cij.org〉.
    • (1998)


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.