Grouping and detecting vertices in 2-D, 3-D, and quasi-3-D objects

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 114-126

  Pilon, Daniel J ^a   Friedman, Alinda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032280136     PISSN: 11961961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0087286     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Autodesk, Inc. (1991). AUTOCAD release 11 [Computer program]. Sausalito, CA: Autodesk, Inc.
2. Autodesk, Inc. (1992). Generic CADD version 6.0 [Computer program]. Bothell, WA: Autodesk, Inc.
3. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1991). Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 393-419.
4. Borland International (1988). Turbo C version 2.0 [Computer program]. Scotts Valley, CA: Borland International.
5. Borland International (1991). Turbo C++ (2nd ed.) [Computer, program]. Scotts Valley, CA: Borland International.
6. Brown, J. M., Weisstein, N., & May, J. G. (1992). Visual search for simple volumetric shapes. Perception and Psychophysics, 51, 40-48.
7. Cerwinski, M., Lightfoot, N., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1992). Automatization and training in visual search. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 271-315.
8. Cohen, A. (1993). Asymmetries in visual search for conjunctive targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 775-797.
9. Donnelly, N., Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (1991). Parallel computation of primitive shape descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 561-570.
10. Downing, C. J., & Pinker, S. (1985). The spatial structure of visual attention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 171-187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Duncan J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
12. Egeth, H. E., Virzi, R. A., & Garbart, H. (1984). Searching for conjunctively defined targets, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 32-39.
13. Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48.
14. Treisman, A., & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 459-478.
15. Treisman, A., & Souther, J. (1985). Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 285-310.
16. Treisman, A., Vieira, A., & Hayes, A. (1992). Automaticity and preattentive processing. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 341-362.
17. Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1993). What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: Evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 331-351.
18. Wolfe J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419-433.