The management of personal and professional boundaries in marriage and family therapy training programs

Contemporary Family Therapy

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 457-470

  Russell, Candyce S ^a   Peterson, Colleen M ^b  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Boundaries; Complex relationships; Dual relationships; Ethics; Family therapy; Mentoring; Training

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032272273     PISSN: 08922764     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1021676015676     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy (1985). Code of ethical principles for marriage and family therapists. Washington, DC: Author.
2. American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy (1988). Code of ethical principles for marriage and family therapists. Washington, DC: Author.
3. American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy (1991). Code of ethical principles for marriage and family therapists. Washington, DC: Author.
4. American Psychological Association (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington, DC: Author.
5. Biaggio, M., & Greene, B. (1995). Overlapping/dual relationships. In E. J. Rave & C. C. Larsen (Eds.), Ethical decision making in therapy: Feminist perspectives (pp. 88-123). New York: Guilford Press.
6. Bowman, V. E. (1995). Faculty-student relationships: The dual-role controversy. Counselor Education and Supervision, 34, 232-242.
7. Brown, L. S. (1994). Boundaries in feminist therapy: A conceptual formulation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 323-336.
8. Gabbard, G., & Pope, K. S. (1989). Sexual intimacies after termination: Clinical, ethical, and legal aspects. In G. Gabbard (Ed.), Sexual exploitation in professional relationships (pp. 115-127). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
9. Glaser, R. D., & Thorpe, J. S. (1986). Unethical intimacy: A survey of sexual contact and advances between psychology educators and female graduate students. American Psychologist, 41, 43-51.
10. Kitchener, K. S. (1988). Dual role relationships: What makes then so problematic? Journal of Counseling and Development, 67, 217-221.
11. Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Peterson, M. (1992). At personal risk: Boundary violations in professional-client relationships. New York: Norton.
13. Peterson, M. (1993). Covert agenda in supervision: Identifying the real culprit. The Commission on Supervision Bulletin, IV(1), pp. 1-7.
14. Peterson, C. M. (1995). An investigation of dual relationships in MFT supervision: Their formation, management, and consequences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
15. Plaut, S. M. (1993). Boundary issues in teacher-student relationships. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 19, 210-219.
16. Pope, K. S. (1989). Teacher-student sexual intimacy. In G. Gabbard (Ed.), Sexual exploitation in professional relationships (pp. 163-176). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
17. Pope, K. S., Keith-Spiegel, P., & Tabachnick, B. S. (1986). Sexual attraction to clients: The human therapist and the (sometimes) inhuman training system. American Psychologist, 41, 147-158.
18. Pope, K. S., Levenson, H., & Schover, L. (1979). Sexual intimacy in psychology training: Results and implications of a national survey. American Psychologist, 34, 682-689.
19. Preister, S., Vesper, J. H., & Humphrey, F. (1994). The evolution of a professional code of ethics. In G. W. Brock (Ed.), American association for marriage and family therapy ethics casebook (pp. 11-25). Washington, DC: American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy.
20. Reid, E., McDaniel, S., Donaldson, C., & Tollers, M. (1987). Taking it personally: Issues of personal authority and competence for the female in family therapy training. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 13, 157-166.
21. Ryder, R. G., & Hepworth, J. (1990). AAMFT ethical code: "Dual relationships". Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 16, 127-132.
22. Storm, C. L. (1991a). Changing the line: An interview with Edwin Friedman. The Commission on Supervision Bulletin, IV(3), 1-2.
23. Storm, C. L. (1991b). Drawing the line?: An issue for all supervisors. The Commission on Supervision Bulletin, IV(3), 1.
24. Storm, C. L. (1993). Dual relationships: Broadening our understanding. The Commission on Supervision Bulletin, VI(1), 1.
25. Storm, C. L., Peterson, M., & Tomm, K. (1997). Multiple relationships in supervision: Stepping up to complexity. In T. C. Todd & C. L. Storm (Eds.), The complete systemic supervisor (pp. 253-271). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
26. Tomm, K. (1993). Defining supervision and therapy: A fuzzy boundary? The Commission on Supervision Bulletin, VI(1), 2.