Partition structures and sufficient statistics

Journal of Applied Probability

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 622-632

  Joyce, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

Exchangeable equivalence relations; Infinite alleles model; Partition structures; Sufficient statistics

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032270599     PISSN: 00219002     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0021900200016272     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. ARRATIA, R., BARBOUR, A. D. AND TAVARÉ, S. (1992). Limit theorems for combinatorial structures via discrete process approximations. Rand. Struct. Alg. 3, 321-345.
2. DONNELLY, P. (1986). Partition structures, Poĺya urns, the Ewens sampling formula, and the ages of alleles. Theoret. Popn Biol. 30, 271-288.
3. DONNELLY, P. AND JOYCE P. (1991). Consistent ordered sampling distributions: characterization and convergence. Adv. Appl. Prob. 23, 229-258.
4. DONNELLY, P. AND JOYCE, P. (1992). Weak convergence of population genealogical processes to a coalescent with ages. Ann. Prob. 20, 322-341.
5. ETHIER, S. N. AND KURTZ, T. G. (1987). The infinitely-many-alleles model with selection as a measure-valued diffusion. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics 70. Springer, Berlin, pp. 72-86.
6. ETHIER, S. N. AND KURTZ, T. G. (1994). Convergence to Fleming-Viot processes in the weak atomic topology. Stoch. Proc. Appl. 54, 1-27.
7. EWENS, W. J. (1972). The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles. Theoret. Popn Biol. 3, 87-112.
8. EWENS, W. J. (1996). Remarks on the Law of Succession. In Athens Conference on Applied Probability and Time Series, Vol. I. Ed. C. C. Heyde, Y. V. Prohorov, S. T. Rachev and R. Pyke. Lecture Notes in Statistics 114, Springer, Berlin, p. 229-244.
9. EWENS, W. J. (1996). Remarks on the Law of Succession. In Athens Conference on Applied Probability and Time Series, Vol. I. Ed. C. C. Heyde, Y. V. Prohorov, S. T. Rachev and R. Pyke. Lecture Notes in Statistics 114, Springer, Berlin, p. 229-244.
10. GRIFFITHS, R. C. (1983). Allele frequencies with genic selection. J. Math. Biol. 17, 1-10.
11. GROTE, M. (1996). Sampling and inference at a locus under symmetric overdominance selection. Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley.
12. HOPPE, F. M. (1984). Poĺya-like urns and the Ewens sampling formula. J. Math. Biol. 20, 91-99.
13. JOYCE, P. (1994). Likelihood ratios for the infinite alleles model. J. Appl. Prob. 31, 595-605.
14. JOYCE, P. (1995). Robustness of the Ewens sampling formula. J. Appl. Prob. 32, 609-622.
15. JOYCE, P. AND TAVARÉ, S. (1995). The distribution of rare alleles. J. Math. Biol. 33, 602-618.
16. KINGMAN, J. F. C. (1978a). Random partitions in population genetics. Proc. R. Soc. London A 361, 1-20.
17. KINGMAN, J. F. C. (1978b). The representation of partition structures. J. London Math. Soc. 18, 374-380.
18. KINGMAN, J. F. C. (1982). On the genealogy of large populations. J. Appl. Prob. 19A, 27-43.
19. KIMURA, M. (1983). Rare variant alleles in the light of the neutral theory. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1, 84-93.
20. PITMAN, J. (1992). The two-parameter generization of Ewens' random partition structure. Technical Report 345, Department of Statistics, University of California at Berkeley.
21. WATTERSON, G. A. (1978). The homozygosity test of neutrality. Genetics 88, 405-417.
22. WATTERSON, G. A. (1987). Estimating the proportion of neutral mutants. Genet. Res. Camb. 501, 155-163.
23. WATTERSON, G. A. (1993). Estimating the proportion of neutral mutations. New Zealand J. Botany 31, 297-306.
24. ZABELL, S. L. (1996). The continuum of inductive methods revisited. In The Cosmos of Science. Ed. J. Earman and J. Norton. University of Pittsburgh Series in the History and Philosophy of Science.