Impact of information technology developments on the information handling techniques of research scientists: Implications of selected results

New Review of Information Networking

Volumn 4, Issue , 1998, Pages 53-70

  Davies, Mary ^a  

^a ST MARY'S UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA HANDLING; DATA REDUCTION; DATA STRUCTURES; DATABASE SYSTEMS; ELECTRONIC MAIL; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION SERVICES; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; STATISTICS;

INFORMATION HANDLING METHODS;

LIBRARIES;

EID: 0032269109     PISSN: 13614576     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13614579809516917     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. DAVIES, M. The information handling techniques of research (laboratory and clinical) scientists: preliminary indications of current practice. Health Libraries Review, 11, 1994, 183-195.
2. BARRY, C.A. Information skills for an electronic world: training doctoral research students. Journal of Information Science, 23 (3), 1997, 225-238.
3. BREMBER, V.L. Investigations of the library usage and information needs of clinical medicine and related disciplines. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford, 1982.
4. PALMQUIST, R.A. The impact of information technology on the individual. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), 27 1992, 3-42.
5. ROYAL SOCIETY. A study of the scientific information system in the United Kingdom: a study on behalf of the Royal Society, the British Library and the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers. London: The Society, 1993 (British Library Research and Development Report; 6123).
6. ROLINSON, J., MEADOWS, A.J. and SMITH, H. Use of information technology by biological researchers. Journal of Information Science, 21 (2), 1995, 133-139.
7. ROLINSON, J., ALSHANBARI, H. and MEADOWS, A.J. Information usage by biological researchers. Journal of Information Science, 22 (1), 1996, 47-53.
8. BUKHARI, A.A. and MEADOWS, A.J. The use of information technology by scientists in British and Saudi Arabian universities: a comparative study. Journal of Information Science, 18 (5), 1992, 409-415.
9. JOINT INFORMATION SYSTEMS COMMITTEE. Five year strategy 1996-2001. Bristol: HEFCE, 1996.
10. MEADOWS, A.J. and BUCKLE, P. A preliminary study of the scientific information system in the UK. London: University of Loughborough, 1991 (British Library Research and Development Report; 6053).
11. ELLIS, D., COX, D. and HALL, K. A comparison of the information-seeking patterns of researchers in the physical and social sciences. Journal of Documentation, 49 (4), 1993, 356-369.
12. TAVISTOCK INSTITUTE. Evaluation of the Electronic Libraries Programme: synthesis of 1996 project annual reports. Bristol: HEFCE, 1997.
13. JOINT FUNDING COUNCILS' LIBRARIES REVIEW GROUP. Report for the Higher Education Funding Council for England, the Scottish Higher Education Funding Council, the Higher Education Funding Council for Wales and the Department of Education for Northern Ireland. (Follett Report). Bristol: HEFCE, 1993.
14. DAVIES, M., BOYLE, F. and OSBORNE, S. CAS-IAS services: where are we now? Electronic Library, 16 (1), 1998, 37-48.
15. CLINTON, P. Charging users for remote document supply in UK university libraries. Interlending & Document Supply, 23 (4), 1995, 14-19.
16. BRUNSKILL, K. CASIAS services: a critical evaluation of the functionality, costs, impact and value. London: British Library Research and Innovation Centre, 1996 (British Library Research and Innovation Report; 4).
17. BAINTON, T. Research and scholarly communication: intellectual property and the flow of information. Serials, 9 (2), 1996, 143-147.
18. NATIONAL COMMITTEE OF INQUIRY INTO HIGHER EDUCATION. Higher education in the learning society: main report. [Dearing Report] London: HMSO 1997.
19. LARIBEE, J.F. and LORBER, C.L. Electronic resources: level of awareness and usage in a university library. CD-ROM Professional, 7 (6), 1994, 137-138, 140-144.
20. ANNUAL RESEARCH REPORT 1994. Manchester: Christie Hospital/Paterson Institute, 1995.
21. BRITTAIN, J.M. Pitfalls of user research and some neglected areas. Social Science Information Studies, 2, 1982, 139-148.