A Cautionary Note on Measurement Error Corrections in Structural Equation Models

Psychological Methods

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 412-423

  DeShon, Richard P ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032268218     PISSN: 1082989X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.412     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
2. Cohen, P., Cohen, J., Teresi, J., Marchi, M., & Valez, C. N. (1990). Problems in the measurement of latent variables in structural equations causal models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 183-196.
3. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
4. Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. New York: Wiley.
5. Feldt, L. S., & Brennan, R. L. (1988). Reliability. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 105-146). New York: Macmillan.
6. Gulliksen, H. (1950). Theory of mental tests. New York: Wiley.
7. Hocking, R. R. (1985). The analysis of linear models. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
8. Hocking, R. R. (1996). Methods and applications of linear models: Regression and the analysis of variance. New York: Wiley.
9. Hom, P. W., & Griffeth, R. W. (1991). Structural equations modeling test of a turnover theory: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 350-366.
10. Hoyle, R. H. (1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 1-15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Huba, G. J., & Harlow, L. L. (1987). Robust structural equation models: Implications for developmental psychology. Child Development, 58, 147-166.
12. James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (1982). Causal analyses: Assmptions, models, and data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36, 109-133.
14. Kenny, D. A. (1979). Correlation and causality. New York: Wiley.
15. Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (1984). Estimating the non-linear and interactive effects of latent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 201-210.
16. Linn, R. L., & Werts, C. E. (1979). Covariance structures and their analysis. In R. E. Traub (Ed.), New directions for testing and measurement: Methodological developments (Vol. 4, pp. 53-73). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Marcoulides, G. A. (1996). Estimating variance components in generalizability theory: The covariance structure analysis approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 290-299.
18. Medsker, G. J., Williams, L. J., & Holahan, P. J. (1994). A review of current practices for evaluating causal models in organizational behavior and human resources management research. Journal of Management, 20, 439-464.
19. Reutherberg, S. E., & Gustafsson, J. E. (1992). Confirmatory factor analysis and reliability: Testing measurement model assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 795-811.
20. Rigdon, E. E. (1994). Demonstrating the effects of unmodeled random measurement error. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 375-380.
21. Schaubroeck, J., Ganster, D. C., & Fox, M. L. (1992). Dispositional affect and work-related stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 322-335.
22. Vandenberg, R. J., & Scarpello, V. (1990). The matching model: An examination of the processes underlying realistic job previews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 60-67.
23. Werts, C. E., Linn, R. L., & Jöreskog, K. G. (1974). Intraclass reliability estimates: Testing structural assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 25-33.