Post-disturbance changes in a desert breeding bird community

Journal of Field Ornithology

Volumn 69, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 614-625

  Patten, Michael A ^a   Rotenberry, John T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032263844     PISSN: 02738570     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. DIEHL. B. 1986. Factors confounding predictions of bird abundance from habitat data. Pp. 229-233, in J. Verner, M. L. Morrison, and C. J. Ralph, eds. Wildlife 2000: modeling habitat relationships of terrestrial vertebrates. Univ. of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin.
2. EVANS, E. W. 1988. Community dynamics of prairie grasshoppers subjected to periodic fire: predictable trajectories or random walks in time? Oikos 52:283-292.
3. GAUCH, H. G., JR. 1982. Multivariate analysis and community structure. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 298 pp.
4. GOTELLI, N. J., AND G. R. GRAVES. 1996. Null models in ecology. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. 368 pp.
5. HECK, K. L., JR., G. VAN BELLE, AND D. SIMBERLOFF. 1975. Explicit calculation of the rarefaction diversity measurement and the determination of sufficient sample size. Ecology 56: 1459-1461.
6. HlCKMAN, J. C., ed. 1993. The Jepson manual: higher plants of California. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, California. 1400 pp.
7. HILL, M. O. 1973. Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54:427-432.
8. _, AND H. G. GAUCH, JR. 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42:47-58.
9. HURLBERT, S. H. 1971. The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52:577-586.
10. INTERNATIONAL BIRD CENSUS COMMITTEE. 1970. An international standard for a mapping method in bird census work recommended by the International Bird Census Committee. Audubon Field Notes 24:722-726.
11. JACKSON, D. A., AND K. M. SOMERS. 1991. Putting things in order: the ups and downs of detrended correspondence analysis. Am. Nat. 137:704-712.
12. JAMES, F. C., AND S. RATHBURN. 1981. Rarefaction, relative abundance, and diversity of avian communities. Auk 98:785-800.
13. _, AND N. O. WAMER. 1982. Relationships between temperate forest bird communities and vegetation structure. Ecology 63:159-171.
14. JOHNSON, R. R., S. W. CAROTHERS, AND J. M. SIMPSON. 1984. A riparian classification system. Pp. 375-382, in R. E. Warner and K. M. Hendrix, eds. California riparian systems: ecology, conservation, and productive management. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, California.
15. LAPRÉ, L. F. 1980. Tahquitz Creek flood control project: biological assessment and impact analysis. Unpubl. report prepared for Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, P.O. Box 1033, Riverside, California 92502.
16. MAGURRAN, A. E. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey. 179 pp.
17. MUELLER-DOMBOIS, D., AND H. ELLENBERG. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 547 pp.
18. PALMER, M. W. 1993. Putting things in even better order: the advantages of canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 74:2215-2230.
19. PATTEN, M. A. 1997. Reestablishment of a rodent community in restored desert scrub. Restor. Ecol. 5:156-161.
20. PC-ORD. 1995. PC-ORD, ver. 2.01. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, Oregon.
21. PEET, R. K. 1974. The measurement of species diversity. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5:285-307.
22. _, R. G. KNOX, J. S. CASE, AND R. B. ALLEN. 1988. Putting things in order: the advantages of detrended correspondence analysis. Am. Nat. 131:924-934.
23. PIELOU, E. C. 1984. The interpretation of ecological data: a primer on classification and ordination. Wiley, New York. 263 pp.
24. RALPH, C. J., G. R. GEUPEL, P. PYLE, T. E. MARTIN, AND D. F. DESANTE. 1993. Handbook of field methods for monitoring landbirds. U.S. Forest Serv., Pac. Southwest Res. Sta., Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-144.
25. REMSEN, J. V., JR. 1994. Use and misuse of bird lists in community ecology and conservation. Auk 111:225-227.
26. ROTENBERRY, J. T. 1990. Variable floral phenology: temporal resource heterogeneity and its implcation for flower visitors. Holarctic Ecol. 13:1-10.
27. _, AND J. A. WIENS. 1980. Habitat structure, patchiness, and avian communities in North American steppe vegetation: a multivariate analysis. Ecology 61:1228-1250.
28. ROUTLEDGE, R. D. 1980. Bias in estimating the diversity of large, uncensused communities. Ecology 61:276-281.
29. WARTENBERG, D., S. FERSON, AND F. J. ROHLF. 1987. Putting things in order: a critique of detrended correspondence analysis. Am. Nat. 129:434-448.
30. WIENS, J. A. 1981. Single-sample surveys of communities: are the revealed patterns real? Am. Nat. 117:90-98.
31. _. 1989. The ecology of bird communities, vol. 1 : foundations and patterns. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 539 pp.
32. WORTHEN, W. B. 1996. Community composition and nested-subset analyses: basic descriptors for community ecology. Oikos 76:417-426.