Mutual recognition agreements: Transatlantic parties and the limits to non-tariff barrier regionalism in the WTO

Journal of World Trade

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 5-31

  Mathis, James H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032263181     PISSN: 10116702     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Abel, A.S. (1941) The Commerce Clause in the Constitutional Convention and in Contemporary Comment, Minnesota Law Review, Vol. xxv, at pp. 432-494.
2. Abbott, F.M. (1990) GATT and the European Community: A Formula for Peaceful Coexistence, Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 12(1), at pp. 1-57.
3. Barents, R. (1981) New Developments in Measures Having Equivalent Effect, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 18, at pp. 271-308.
4. Clarke, J. (1996) Mutual Recognition Agreements, International Trade Law and Regulation, Vol. 2, at pp. 31-36.
5. Cottier, T. (1996) The Challenge of Regionalization and Preferential Relations in World Trade Law and Policy, European Foreign Affairs Review, Vol. 2, at pp. 149-167.
6. Eule, J.N. (1982) Laying the Dormant Commerce Clause to Rest, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 91(3), at pp. 425-485.
7. European Commission (1989) A Global Approach to Certification and Testing, Com(89) 209 Final, 89/C/267/03, 19 October.
8. European Commission (1995) Europe and the US: The Way Forward, COM(95) 411, 26 July.
9. European Commission (1998) New Transatlantic Market, Commission Communication to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee, Europe Documents, No. 2080-81, 25 March.
10. European Commission (DG1) (1996) Guide to European Community Negotiations with Third Countries Concerning the Mutual Recognition of Conformity Assessment, Brussels.
11. European Commission Services (1995) Results of the Seville Conference of the Transatlantic Business Dialogue, 18 January, Brussels.
12. European Council of Ministers (1990) Resolution on a Global Approach to Conformity Assessment, 90/C/10/01, 16 January.
13. Farber, D.A. and R.E. Hudec (1996) GATT Legal Restraints on Domestic Environmental Regulations, in J. Bhagwati and R. Hudec (eds) Fair Trade and Harmonization, Vol. 2, Legal Analysis, MIT Press, Cambridge, at pp. 59-93.
14. GATT, The (1995) Analytical Index: Guide to GATT Law and Practice, Updated 6th Edition.
15. Heinzerling, L. (1995) The Commercial Constitution, The Supreme Court Review, at pp. 217-276.
16. Holmes, P. and J. Mathis (1997) Europe Agreement Competition Policy for the Long Tenu: An Accession Oriented Approach, Legal Issues of European Integration, 1991/1, at pp. 17-34.
17. Kerremans, B. (1998) Transatlantic Trade Policy Relations: Bilateral and Multilateral Implications of the Emerging Transatlantic Marketplace in Goods, in G. Denton (ed.) Implementation of the New Transatlantic Agenda and Future Prospects, TransEuropean Policy Studies Association (TEPSA), Brussels.
18. Mathis, J. (1998) External Legal Aspects of the Transatlantic Marketplace, in G. Denton (ed.) Implementation of the New Transatlantic Agenda and Future Prospects, TransEuropean Policy Studies Association (TEPSA), Brussels.
19. Mattoo, A. (1997) National Treatment in the GATS, Corner-Stone or Pandora's Box?, 31 JWT 1, at pp. 108-135.
20. Stokes, B. (ed.) (1996) Open For Business: Creating a Transatlantic Marketplace, Council on Foreign Relations, New York.
21. Twysman, W.F. (1995) Beyond Purpose: Addressing State Discrimination in Interstate Commerce, South Carolina Law Review, Vol. 47(3), at pp. 381-447.
22. Völker, E. (1994) The Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, in J. Bourgeois, F. Berrod and E.G. Fournier (eds) The Uruguay Round Results, College of Europe, at pp. 281-310.