Ideology and the construction of nationality: The Canadian elections of 1993

Public Choice

Volumn 97, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 401-428

  Hinich, Melvin J ^a   Munger, Michael C ^b   De Marchi, Scott ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032262395     PISSN: 00485829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1005089925291     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Aldrich, J. (1983). A spatial model with party activists: Implications for electoral dynamics. Public Choice 41: 63-100.
2. Aldrich, J. (1995). Why parties?: The origin and transformation of party politics in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Bothwell, R. (1995). Canada and Quebec: One country, two histories. British Columbia: UBC Press.
4. Brimelow, P. (1986). The patriot game: National dreams and political realities. New York: K. Porter Books.
5. Brimelow, P. (1995). Alien nation: Common sense about America's immigration disaster. New York: Harper Collins.
6. Clarke, H. and Stewart, M. (1992). Light anchors, choppy seas: Social structure and party choice in Canada. In M. Franklin, et al. (Eds.), Electoral change: Responses to evolving social and attitudinal structures in western countries. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Clarkson, S. (1978). Anti-nationalism in Canada: The ideology of mainstream economics. Canadian Review of Studies in nationalism 5: 45-65.
8. Denzau, A. and North, D. (1994). Shared mental models: Ideologies and institutions. Kyklos 47: 3-32.
9. Enelow, J. and Hinich, M. (1984). The spatial theory of voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Flanagan, T. (1994). Invasion from the right: The reform party in the 1993 Canadian election. Papers in Political Economy, No. 42. Political Research Group: University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.
11. Gibson, G. (1994). Plan B: The future of the rest of Canada. British Columbia: Fraser Institute.
12. Hinich, M. and Munger, M. (1994). Ideology and the theory of political choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
13. Hinich, M. and Munger, M. (1997). New issues and the dynamics of political change. Typescript. Department of Political Science, Duke University.
14. Hinich, M. and Pollard, W. (1981). A new approach to the spatial theory of electoral competition. American Journal of Political Science 25: 323-341.
15. Johnston, R. (1993). Issues and party allignments: A review with Canadian examples. In A. Breton, et al. (Eds.), Preferences and democracy, 265-286. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
16. Jones, B. (1994). Reconceiving decision-making in democratic politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Kornberg, A. (1988). Politics and culture in Canada. Ann Arbor, Center for Political Studies, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
18. Kornberg, A. and Clarke, H. (1992). Citizens and community: Political support in a representative democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Kornberg, A., Mishler, W. and Smith, J. (1975). Political elite and mass perceptions of party locations in issue space: Some tests of two propositions. British Journal of Political Science 5: 161-185.
20. Lupia, A. (1992). Busy voters, agenda control, and the power of information. American Political Science Review 86: 390-404.
21. MacDonald, S. and Rabinowitz, G. (1987). The dynamics of structural realignment. American Political Science Review 81: 775-796.
22. McKelvey, R. (1976). Intransitivities in multidimensional voting bodies and some implications for agenda control. Journal of Economic Theory 30: 283-314.
23. McRae, K.D. (1964). The structure of Canadian history. In L. Hartz (Ed.), The founding of new societies. New York: Harcourt Brace.
24. Migué J.-L. (1977). Public choice in a federal system. Public Choice 90: 000-000.
25. Morris, R.B. et al. (Eds.). (1982). Encyclopedia of American history. 6th edition. New York: Harper & Row.
26. Moynihan, D.P. (1993). Pandaemonium: Ethnicity in international politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Ordeshook, P.C. (1976). The spatial theory of elections: A review and critique. In I. Budge, et al. (Eds.), Party identification and beyond. New York: Wiley.
28. Poole, K. and Rosenthal, H. (1993). Spatial realignment and the mapping of issues in U.S. history: The evidence from roll call voting. In W. Riker (Ed.), Agenda formation, 12-40. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
29. Poole, K.T. and Rosenthal, H. (1997). Congress: A political economic history of roll call voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Rabinowitz, G. and MacDonald, S. (1989). A direction theory of issue voting. American Political Science Review 83: 93-121.
31. Riker, W. (1982). Liberalism vs. populism: A confrontation between the theory of democracy and the theory of social choice. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
32. Riker, W. (1986). The art of political manipulation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
33. Riker, W. (1990). Heresthetic and rhetoric in the spatial model. In J. Enelow and M. Hinich (Eds.), Advances in the spatial theory of voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. Schofield, N. (1985). Anarchy, altruism, and cooperation. Social Choice and Welfare 2: 207-219.
35. Taylor, M. (1976). Anarchy and cooperation. London: Wiley.
36. Taylor, M. (1982). Community, anarchy, and liberty. New York: Cambridge University Press.
37. Thompson, D.C. (1988). Vive le Québec libre. Toronto: Deneau Publishers.