Consider the Source: Organizational Bias in Estimates of Foreign Military Spending

International Studies Quarterly

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 161-174

  Lebovic, James H ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEFENSE SPENDING; FOREIGN POLICY; PUBLIC SPENDING;

EID: 0032229944     PISSN: 00208833     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0020-8833.00073     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. BALL, N. (1984) Measuring Third World Security Expenditure: A Research Note. World Development 12:157-164.
2. BERKOWITZ, B. D. (1985) Intelligence in the Organizational Context: Coordination and Error in National Estimates. Orbis 29:571-596.
3. CHAN, S. (1995) Grasping the Peace Dividend: Some Propositions on the Conversion of Swords into Plowshares. Mershon International Studies Review 39:53-95.
4. EICHENBERG, R. C. (1992) "Do We Yet Know Who Pays for Defense?" In Defense, Welfare, and Growth, edited by S. Chan and A. Mintz, pp. 231-241. London: Routledge.
5. GOLDSTEIN, J. S., AND J. R. FREEMAN (1990) Three-Way Street: Strategic Reciprocity in World Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. HOLLIST, L. (1977) An Analysis of Arms Processes in the Soviet Union. International Studies Quarterly 21:503-528.
7. KREPON, M. (1988) Can This Agency Be Saved? Bulletin of Atomic Scientist (December):35-38.
8. LEBOVIC, J. H. (1995) How Organizations Learn: U.S. Government Estimates of Foreign Military Spending. American Journal of Political Science 39:835-863.
9. MAJESKI, S. J. (1983) Mathematical Models of the U.S. Military Expenditure Decision-making Process. American Journal of Political Science 27:485-514.
10. STOCKHOLM INTERNATIONAL PEACE RESEARCH INSTITUTE (1968/69-92) World Armaments and Disarmament, SIPRI Yearbook. London: Taylor and Frances; Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. U.S. ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT AGENCY (1974-95) World Military Expenditures and Arms Trade. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
12. WARD, M. D. (1984) Differential Paths to Parity: A Study of the Contemporary Arms Race. American Political Science Review 78:297-317.
13. WOHLSTETTER, A. (1974a) Is There a Strategic Arms Race? Foreign Policy 15(Summer):3-20.
14. WOHLSTETTER, A. (1974b) Rivals but No "Race." Foreign Policy 16(Fall):48-92.