Motivated cognitive processing and attitude change

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 24, Issue 7, 1998, Pages 715-726

  Lundgren, Sharon R ^a   Prislin, Radmila ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032222258     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167298247004     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Bacon, F. (1960). The new organon and related writings. New York: Liberal Arts Press. (Original work published 1620)
3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4. Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uhleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford.
5. Chen, S., Shechter, D., & Chaiken, S. (1996). Getting the truth or getting along: Accuracy-versus impression-motivated heuristic and systematic processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 262-275.
6. Converse, P. E. (1970). Attitudes and non-attitudes: Continuation of a dialogue. In E. R. Tufte (Ed.), The quantitative analysis of social problems (pp. 168-189). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
8. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9. Frey, D. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 40-80). New York: Academic Press.
10. Higgins, E. T., & McCann, C. D. (1984). Social encoding and subsequent attitudes, impressions, and memory: "Context-driven" and motivational aspects of processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 26-39.
11. Holton, B., & Pyszczynski, T. (1989). Biased information search in the interpersonal domain. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 42-51.
12. Howard-Pitney, B., Borgida, E., & Omoto, A. M. (1986). Personal involvement: An examination of processing differences. Social Cognition, 4, 39-57.
13. Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 290-314.
14. Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163-204.
15. Kruglanski, A. W. (1975). The human subjects in the psychology experiment: Fact and artifact. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 101-147). New York: Academic Press.
16. Kruglanski, A. W. (1980). Lay epistemology process and contents. Psychological Review, 87, 70-87.
17. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
18. Leippe, M. R., & Elkin, R. A. (1987). When motives clash: Issue involvement and response involvement as determinants of persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 269-278.
19. Liberman, A., & Chaiken, S. (1992). Defensive processing of personally relevant health messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 669-679.
20. MacKinnon, D. P. (1994). Analysis of mediating variables in prevention and intervention research. In A. Cazares & L. A. Beatty (Eds.), Scientific methods for prevention intervention research (Monograph 139, pp. 127-153). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
21. McGuire, W.J. (1969). The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In E. Aronson & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 136-314). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
22. Neises, L. K. (1988). The effects of response involvement and three levels of issue involvement on information processing and attitude formation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
23. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 170-174). New York: Academic Press.
24. Prislin, R., & Pool, G. J. (1996). Behavior, consequences, and the self: Is all well that ends well? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 933-948.
25. Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (1987). Toward an integration of cognitive and motivational perspectives on social inference: A biased hypothesis-testing model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 297-340). New York: Academic Press.
26. Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., & Holt, K. (1985). Maintaining consistency between self-serving beliefs and available data: A bias in information evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 179-190.
27. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.