A Demonstration of Research Methodologies Used in Psycholinguistics

Teaching of Psychology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 61-63

  Langstom, William ^a  

^a DENISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032221562     PISSN: 00986283     EISSN: 15322802     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15328023top2501_20     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bransford J. D. Franks J. J. (1971). The abstraction of linguistic ideas. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 331–350.
2. Glenberg A. M. Meyer M. Lindem K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 69–83.
3. Goernert P. N. (1994). MindLab: A software tool for integrating interactive microcomputer exercises into the classroom. Teaching of Psychology, 21, 184–186.
4. Haberlandt K. (1994). Methods in reading research. In Gernsbacher M. A. (ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 1–31). San Diego, CA: Academic.
5. Jenkins J. J. (1974). Remember that old theory of memory? Well, forget it. American Psychologist, 29, 785–795.
6. Keenan J. M. Baillet S. D. Brown P. (1984). The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 115–126.
7. Nimmer J. G. Handelsman M. M. (1992). Effects of subject pool policy on student attitudes toward psychology and psychological research. Teaching of Psychology, 19, 141–144.
8. Sieber J. E. Saks M. J. (1989). A census of subject pool characteristics and policies. American Psychologist, 44, 1053–1061.
9. Think Pascal 4.0 [Computer programming language]. (1991). Cupertino, CA: Symantec Corporation.