Representations of an osmosis problem

American Biology Teacher

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 27-30

  Zuckerman, June Trop ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032221087     PISSN: 00027685     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/4450407     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Anzai, Y. & Yokoyama, T. (1984). Internal models in physics problem solving. Cognition and Instruction, 1(4), 397-450.
2. Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P.J. & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
3. Cohen, E.G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35.
4. Driver, R. (1983). The Pupil as Scientist? Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
5. Friedler, Y., Amir, R. & Tamir, P. (1987). High school students'difficulties in understanding osmosis. International Journal of Science Education, 9(5), 541-551.
6. Gayford, C.G. (1984). Water relations and the vacuolated plant cell: A brief study of the topic at advanced level in school biology. Journal of Biological Education, 18(2), 151-155.
7. Hayes, J.R. (1989). The Complete Problem Solver (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
8. Hutchinson, C.S. & Sutcliffe, J.F. (1983). An approach to the teaching of cell water relations in biology at A-level using the water potential concept. Journal of Biological Education, 17(2), 123-130.
9. Schraer, W.D. & Stoltze, H.J. (1991). Biology: The Study of Life (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10. Simon, H.A. & Hayes, J.R. (1976). The understanding process: Problem isomorphs. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 165-190.