The effect of parent participation in strategies to improve the homework performance of students who are at risk

Remedial and Special Education

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 131-141

  Callahan, Kevin ^a   Rademacher, Joyce A ^b   Hildreth, Bertina L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032220848     PISSN: 07419325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/074193259801900302     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Andersen, B., Mead, N., & Sullivan, S. (1986). Homework: What do national assessment results tell us? Princeton, NJ: National Assessment of Educational Progress.
2. Austin, J. D. (1979). Homework research in mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 79, 115-121.
3. Bay, M., & Bryan, T. (1992). Differentiating children who are at risk for referral from others on critical classroom factors. Remedial and Special Education, 12(4), 27-33.
4. Bents-Hill, C., Boswell, R., Byers, J., Cohen, N., Cummings, J., & Leavitt, B. (1988, April). Relationship of academic performance to parent estimates of homework time. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists, Chicago, IL.
5. Bradshaw, J., & Amundson, K. J. (1985). Homework: Helping students achieve. Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 266 526)
6. Broxie, G. J. B. (1988). Parental participation in homework completion as a predictor of academic success of students in the single parent family (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1987). Dissertation Abstracts International, 48(11), 2806A.
7. Canter, L., & Hausner, L. (1987). Homework without tears. New York: Harper & Row.
8. Clary, L. M. (1986). Help for the homework hassle. Academic Therapy, 22(1), 57-60.
9. Cooper, H., & Nye, B. (1994). Homework for students with learning disabilities: The implications of research for policy and practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 470-479.
10. Coulter, F. (1980). Secondary school homework (Co-operative Research Study: Report No. 7). Perth, Australia: Department of Education, University of Western Australia, and the Education Department of Western Australia. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 209 200)
11. Crawford, J. (1989). Instructional activities related to achievement gain in Chapter 1 classes. In R. E. Slavin, N. L. Karweit, & N. A. Madden (Eds.), Effective programs for students at risk (pp. 264-290). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
12. Davis, F. (1984). Understanding underachievers. American Education, 20(10), 12-14.
13. England, D. A., & Flatley, J. K. (1985). Homework - and why. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 260 052)
14. Epstein, J. L. (1988). Homework practices, achievements, and behaviors of elementary school students. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools.
15. Epstein, M. H., Polloway, E. A., Foley, R. M., & Patton, J. R. (1993). Homework: A comparison of teachers' and parents' perceptions of the problems experienced by students identified as having behavioral disorders, learning disabilities, or no disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 14(5), 40-50.
16. Featherstone, H. (1985). What does homework accomplish? Principal, 65(2), 6-7.
17. Foyle, H.C., & Bailey, G. D. (1986). Homework: Its real purpose. The Clearing House, 61, 187-188.
18. Frith, G. (1991). Facilitating homework through effective support systems. Teaching Exceptional Children, 24(1), 48-49.
19. Frymier, J., & Gansneder, B. (1989). The Phi Delta Kappa study of students at risk. Kappan, 71, 142-146.
20. Gajria, M., & Salend, S. (1995). Homework practices of students with and without learning disabilities: A comparison. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 291-296.
21. Glomb, N., & West, R. P. (1990). Teaching behaviorally disordered adolescents to use self-management skills for improving the completeness, accuracy, and neatness of creative writing homework assignments. Behavioral Disorders, 15, 233-242.
22. Goldstein, A. (1960). Does homework help? A review of research. The Elementary School Journal, 40, 212-224.
23. Hofmeister, A., & Lubke, M. (1990). Research into practice: Implementing effective teaching strategies. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
24. Howard, M. A. P., & Anderson, R. J. (1978). Early identification of potential school dropouts: A literature review. Child Welfare, 52, 221-231.
25. Hutton, J. B. (1983). How to decrease problem behavior at school by rewarding desirable behavior at home. Pointer, 27(4), 25-28.
26. Jayanthi, M., Sawyer, V., Nelson, J. S., & Bursuck, W. D. (1995). Recommendations for homework communication problems: From parents, classroom teachers, and special education teachers. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 212-225.
27. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1985). Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement: Comprehensive Form Manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
28. Kay, P. J., Fitzgerald, M., Paradee, C., & Mellencamp, A. (1994). Making homework work at home: The parent's perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 550-561.
29. Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Kuerston, J. (1984). Ten things that parents wish teachers would do. PTA Today, 10(2), 4-5.
31. LaConte, R. T. (1981). Homework as a learning experience: What research says to the teacher. Washington, DC: National Education Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 217 022)
32. Landers, M. F. (1984). Helping the LD child with homework: Ten tips. Academic Therapy, 20, 209-215.
33. Lavely, C. D. (1992, April). Evaluating educators of at-risk students: Guidelines for principals, teachers, and professional support personnel. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Institute for At-Risk Infants, Children & Youth and Their Families.
34. Lloyd, D. N. (1978). Prediction of school failure from third grade data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 1193-1200.
35. Lombardi, T. P., Odell, K. S., & Novotny, D. E. (1991). Special education and students at risk: Findings from a national study. Remedial and Special Education, 12(1), 56-62.
36. Maag, J. W., Reid, R., & DiGangi, S. A. (1993). Differential effects of self-accuracy, and productivity. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 26, 329-344.
37. McDermott, R. P., Goldman, S. V., & Varenne, H. (1984). When school goes home: Some problems in the organization of homework. Teachers-College-Record, 85, 391-409.
38. McLaughlin, T. F., Krappman, V. F., & Welsh, J. M. (1985). The effects of self-recording for on-task behavior of behaviorally disordered special education students. Remedial and Special Education, 6(2), 42-45.
39. Mulry, J. G. (1961). We need research on homework! Journal of the National Education Association, 50, 49.
40. Natriello, G., & McDill, E. L. (1986). Performance standards: Student effort on homework and academic achievement. Sociology of Education, 59, 18-31.
41. Nelson, J. R., Smith, D. J., Young, K. R., & Dodd, J. M. (1991). A review of self-management outcome research conducted with students who exhibit behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 16, 169-179.
42. Otto, W. (1985). Homework: A meta-analysis. Journal of Reading, 28, 764-766.
43. Piersel, W. C. (1985). Self-observation and completion of school assignments: The influence of a physical recording device and expectancy characteristics. Psychology in the Schools, 22, 331-337.
44. Quackenbush, R., & Gastineau, J. (1989, March). The academic skills workshop: A parent/child group intervention to stop school failure. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists, Boston, MA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 318 961)
45. Reid, R., & Harris, K. R. (1992, April). Self-monitoring of attention versus self-monitoring of performance: Effects on attention and academic performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
46. Rhode, G., Morgan, D. P., & Young, K. R. (1983). Generalization and maintenance of treatment gains of behaviorally handicapped students from resource rooms to regular classrooms using self-evaluation procedures. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 16, 171-187.
47. Rosenberg, M. S. (1989). The effects of daily homework assignments on the acquisition of basic skills by students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 314-323.
48. Rutherford, W. L. (1989, March). Secondary school homework practices: Uses and misuses. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 311 051)
49. Salend, S. J., & Gajria, M. (1995). Increasing the homework completion rates of students with mild disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 271-278.
50. Salend, S. J., & Schliff, J. (1989). An examination of the homework practices of teachers of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 621-623.
51. Samway, K. (1986). And you run and you run to catch up with the sun, but it's sinking. Language Arts, 63, 352-357.
52. Simpson, R. L. (1988). Needs of parents and families whose children have learning and behavior problems. Behavioral Disorders, 14, 40-47.
53. Slavin, R. E. (1989). Students at risk for school failure: The problem and its dimensions. In R. E. Slavin, N. L. Karweit, & N. A. Madden (Eds.), Effective programs for students at risk (pp. 3-17). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
54. Smith, D. J. (1989). The generalization of treatment gains of mildly handicapped adolescents from special education to regular education classrooms using peer-mediated self-management procedures (Doctoral dissertation, Utah State University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 50, 1206A.
55. Smith, D. J., Young, K. R., Nelson, J. R., & West, R. P. (1992). The effect of a self-management procedure on the classroom and academic behavior of students with mild handicaps. School Psychology Review, 21, 59-72.
56. Sonna, L. A. (1990). A homework solution. Charlotte, VT: Williamson.
57. Struckoff, P. M., McLaughlin, T. F., & Bialozer, R. C. (1987). The effects of a daily report card system in increasing homework completion and accuracy in a special education settings. Techniques, 3(1), 19-26.
58. Trammel, D. L., Schloss, P. J., & Alper, S. (1994). Using self-recording, evaluation, and graphing to increase completion of homework assignments. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 75-81.
59. U.S. Department of Education. (1987). What works: Research about teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Pueblo, CO: Consumer Information Center.
60. Utah State Office of Education. (1984). Research on effective schools/classroom processes. Research resources dealing with the "effective school" literature. Classroom processes. Salt Lake City, UT: Author.
61. Vacha, E. F., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1992). The social structural, family, school and personal characteristics of at-risk students: Policy recommendations for personnel. Journal of Education, 174(3), 9-25.
62. Vinograd-Bausell, C. R., Bausell, R. B., Proctor, W., & Chandler, B. (1986). Impact of unsupervised parent tutors on word recognition skills. The Journal of Special Education, 20, 83-90.
63. Walberg, H. J., Paschal, R. A., & Weinstein, T. (1985). Homework's powerful effects on learning. Educational Leadership, 42(7), 76-79.
64. Young, K. R., West, R. P., Smith, D. J., & Morgan, D. P. (1991). Teaching self-management strategies to adolescents. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.