Programs for the gifted: To be or not to be

Journal for the Education of the Gifted

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 3-36

  Tannenbaum, Abraham J ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032220729     PISSN: 01623532     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/016235329802200102     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Allan, S. (1991). Ability-grouping research reviews: What do they say about grouping and the gifted? Educational Leadership, 48(6), 60-65.
2. Benbow, C. P., & Arjmand, O. (1990). Predictors of high academic achievement in mathematics and science by mathematically talented students: A longitudinal study, Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 430-441.
3. Benbow, C. P., & Lubinski, D. (Eds.). (1996). Intellectual talent. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
4. Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1996). Inequity in equity. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 2, 249-292.
5. Bloom, A. (1987). The closing of the American mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.
6. Bronner, E. (1998, February 25) U.S. trails the world in math and science. The New York Times (Education, p. B10.)
7. Coleman, L. J. (Ed.). (1996). Critical appraisals of gifted education [Special issue]. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19(2).
8. Commoner, B. (1966). Science and survival. New York: Viking.
9. Coover, R. (1992, June 21). The New York Times Book Review Section.
10. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325-339). New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Darling-Hammond, L. (1991). The implications of testing policy for quality and equality. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 220-225.
12. Feldhusen, J. (1989). Synthesis of research on gifted youth. Educational Leadership, 46, 6-11.
13. Gallagher, J. J. (1993). Academic effectiveness or social reform? The College Board Review, 168, 18-19, 34-35.
14. Gamoran, A., Nystrand, M., Berends, M., & LePore, P. C. (1995). An organizational analysis of the effects of ability grouping. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 687-715.
15. Goldberg, M. L., Passow, A. H., Justman, J., & Hage, G. (1965). The effects of ability grouping. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.
16. Hofstadter, R. (1963). Anti-intellectualism in American life. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
17. Howley, C. B., Howley, A., & Pendarvis, E. (1995) Out of our minds: Anti-intellectualism and talent development in American schooling. New York: Teachers College Press.
18. Jonas, H. (1996). Mortality and morality: A search for the good after Auschwitz. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
19. Krutch, J. W. (1953). Is our common man too common? Saturday Review of Literature, 36, 8, 9.
20. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1982). Effects of ability grouping on secondary students: A meta-analysis of evaluation findings. American Education Research Journal, 19, 415-428.
21. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1987). Effects of ability grouping on school achievement. Equity and Excellence, 23, 22-30.
22. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1991). Ability grouping and gifted students. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education, (pp. 178-196). Needham, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
23. Llewellyn, J. (1993). Providing a gifted education for every child. The College Board Review, 168, 13.
24. Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man. Boston: Beacon Press.
25. Margolin, L. (1994). Goodness personified: The emergence of gifted children. New York: Aldine deGruyter.
26. Margolin, L. (1996). A pedagogy of privilege. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 164-180.
27. Marsh, H. W., Chessor, D., Craven, R., & Roche, L. (1995). The effects of gifted and talented programs on academic self-concept. The big fish strikes again. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 227-249.
28. McClary, S. (1987). Getting down off the beanstalk: The presence of women in Janika Vandervelde's Genesis II. Minnesota Composers Forum Newsletter.
29. Morgan, H. (1981). Adolescent attitudes toward academic brilliance. Mimeo. Boulder: University of Colorado.
30. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.
31. Oakes, J., Gamoran, A., & Page, R. N. (1992). Curriculum differentiation: Opportunities, outcomes, and meanings. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 570-608). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
32. Page, E. B., & Keith, T. Z. (1996). The elephant in the classroom: Ability grouping and the gifted. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent (pp. 192-210). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
33. Passow, A. H. (1988). Issues of access to knowledge: Group tracking. In L. N. Tanner (Ed.), Critical issues in curriculum (pp. 205-225). Eighty-seventh Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part I). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34. Reich, C. A. (1970). The greening of America. New York: Random House.
35. Sapon-Shevin, M. (1994). Playing favorites: Gifted education and the disruption of community. Albany: State University of New York Press.
36. Sapon-Shevin, M. (1996). Beyond gifted education: Building a shared agenda for school reform. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 194-214.
37. Sawyer, R. N. (1988). In defense of academic rigor. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 5-19.
38. Silverman, L. K. (1993). Gifted and talented. In E. L. Meyen & T. M. Skrtic (Eds.), Exceptional children and youth: An introduction (4th ed.). Denver, CO: Love.
39. Slavin, R. E. (1990). Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Madison, WI: National Center on Effective Secondary Schools.
40. Slavin, R. E. (1994). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
41. Slavin, R. E., & Braddock, J. H., III. (1993). Ability grouping: On the wrong track. The College Board Review, 168, 11-18.
42. Solomon, D., Watson, M., Schaps, E., Battistish, V., & Solomon, J. (1990). Cooperative learning as a part of a comprehensive classroom program to promote prosocial development. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Recent research on cooperative learning. New York: Praeger.
43. Stevens, R. J., & Slavin, R. E. (1995). The cooperative elementary school: Effects on students' achievement, attitudes, and social relations. American Educational Research Journals, 32, 321-351.
44. Tannenbaum, A. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. New York: Macmillan.
45. Tannenbaum, A. J. (1996). The IQ controversy and the gifted. In C. P. Benbow & D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent (pp. 44-77). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
46. Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1947). The gifted child grows up. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
47. Thorndike, R. L. (1963). The concepts of over-and underachievement. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.
48. Tocqueville, A., de (1945). Democracy in America. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. (Original work published in 1845)
49. Trilling, L. (1951). The liberal imagination. New York: Viking.