Interest alignment and coalitions in multiparty negotiation

Academy of Management Journal

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 42-54

  Polzer, Jeffrey T ^a   Mannix, Elizabeth A ^b   Neale, Margaret A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032220625     PISSN: 00014273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/256896     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Adams, J. S. 1963. Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67: 422-436.
2. Ancona, D., Friedman, R., & Kolb, D. 1991. The group and what happens on the way to "yes." Negotiation Journal, 7: 155-174.
3. Ashenfelter, O., & Bloom, D. E. 1984. Models of arbitrator behavior: Theory and evidence. American Economic Review, 74: 111-124.
4. Aumann, R. J., & Maschler, M. 1964. The bargaining set for cooperative games. In M. Dresher, L. S. Shapley, & A. W. Tucker (Eds.), Advances in game theory: 443-476. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5. Bazerman, M. H. 1985. Norms of distributive justice in interest arbitration. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 38: 558-570.
6. Bazerman, M. H., Magliozzi, T., & Neale, M. A. 1985. Integrative bargaining in a competitive market. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34: 294-313.
7. Bazerman, M. H., Mannix, E., & Thompson, L. 1988. Groups as mixed-motive negotiations. In E. J. Lawler & B. Markovsky (Eds.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research: 195-216. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
8. Bazerman, M. H., & Neale, M. A. 1983. Heuristics in negotiation: Limitations to dispute resolution effectiveness. In M. H. Bazerman & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiation in organizations: 51-67. Beverly Hills: Sage.
9. Ben-Yoav, O., & Pruitt, D. 1984. Resistance to yielding and the expectation of cooperative future interaction in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20: 323-353.
10. Berscheid, E., Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. 1989. Issues in studying close relationships: Conceptualizing and measuring closeness. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Close relationships: 63-91. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11. Bettenhausen, K., & Murnighan, J. K. 1985. The emergence of norms in competitive decision-making groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30: 350-372.
12. Bies, B., Tripp, T., & Neale, M. 1993. Procedural fairness, framing and profit seeking: Perceived legitimacy of market exploitation. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 6: 243-256.
13. Brett, J. 1991. Negotiating group decisions. Negotiation Journal, July: 291-310.
14. Brett, J., & Rognes, J. 1986. Intergroup relations in organizations: A negotiation perspective. In P. S. Goodman (Ed.), Designing effective work groups: 202-236. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Caplow, T. A. 1956. A theory of coalitions in the triad. American Sociological Review, 21: 489-493.
16. Chertkoff, J. M. 1967. A revision of Caplow's coalition theory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3: 172-177.
17. Davis, K. E., & Todd, M. J. 1985. Assessing friendship: Prototypes, paradigm cases and relationship description. In S. Duck & D. Perlman (Eds.), Understanding personal relationships: An interdisciplinary approach: 17-38. London: Sage.
18. Davis, M., & Maschler, R. J. 1965. The kernel of a cooperative game. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 12(3): 223-259.
19. Deutsch, M. 1975. Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31(3): 137-149.
20. Emerson, R. M. 1964. Power-dependence relations: Two experiments. Sociometry, 27: 282-298.
21. Fisher, R., & Ury, W. 1981. Getting to yes. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
22. Froman, L., & Cohen, M. 1970. Compromise and logroll: Comparing the efficiency of two bargaining processes. Behavioral Science, 30: 180-183.
23. Gaertner, S., Mann, J., Murrell, A., & Dovidio, J. 1989. Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57: 239-249.
24. Gamson, W. A. 1961. A theory of coalition formation. American Sociological Review, 26: 373-382.
25. Greenberg, J., & Cohen, R. L. 1982. Equity and justice in social behavior. New York: Academic Press.
26. Heider, F. 1958. The psychology of interpersonal relationships. New York: Wiley.
27. Homans, G. 1950. The social group. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
28. Homans, G. 1961. Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt Brace.
29. Horowitz, A. D. 1973. The competitive bargaining set for cooperative n-person games. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 10(3): 265-289.
30. Kahan, J. P., & Rapoport, A. 1984. Theories of coalition formation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Kelley, H. H. 1966. A classroom study of the dilemmas in interpersonal negotiation. In K. Archibald (Ed.), Strategic interaction and conflict: 49-73. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.
32. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. 1978. Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.
33. Komorita, S. S. 1974. A weighted probability model of coalition formation. Psychological Review, 81: 242-256.
34. Komorita, S. S. 1979. An equal-excess model of coalition formation. Behavioral Science, 24: 369-381.
35. Komorita, S. S., & Chertkoff, J. M. 1973. A bargaining theory of coalition formation. Psychological Review, 80: 149-162.
36. Komorita, S. S., & Hamilton, T. P. 1984. Power and equity in coalition bargaining. In S. B. Bacharach & E. J. Lawler (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations: 189-212. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
37. Komorita, S. S., & Kravitz, D. 1983. Coalition formation: A social psychological approach. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Basic group processes: 179-203. New York: Springer-Verlag.
38. Komorita, S. S., & Parks, C. D. 1995. Interpersonal relations: Mixed-motive interaction. In J. T. Spence, J. M. Darley, & D. J. Foss (Eds.), Annual review of psychology, vol. 46: 183-207. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
39. Komorita, S. S., & Tumonis, T. M. 1980. Extensions and tests of some descriptive theories of coalition formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39: 256-268.
40. Kramer, R. M. 1993. Cooperation and organizational identification. In J. K. Murnighan (Ed.), Social psychology in organizations: 244-268. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
41. Kramer, R. M., & Brewer, M. B. 1984. The effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46: 1044-1057.
42. Leventhal, G. S. 1976. The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology: 91-131. New York: Academic Press.
43. Leventhal, G. S. 1980. What should be done with equity theory? In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research: 27-55. New York: Plenum.
44. Lind, E. A., & Lissak, R. I. 1985. Apparent impropriety and procedural fairness judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21: 19-29.
45. Luce, D., & Raiffa, H. 1957. Games and decision: Introduction and critical survey. New York: Wiley.
46. Mannix, E. A. 1993. Organizations as resource dilemmas: The effects of power balance on group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55: 1-22.
47. Mannix, E. A. 1994. Will we meet again? The effects of power, distribution rules, and the scope of future interaction in small group negotiation. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5: 343-368.
48. Mannix, E. A., Neale, M., & Northcraft, G. 1995. Equity, equality or need? The effects of organizational culture and resource valence on allocation decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63: 276-286.
49. Mannix, E. A., & White, S. 1992. The effect of distributive uncertainty on coalition formation in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51: 198-219.
50. Miller, C., & Komorita, S. 1986. Coalition formation in organizations: What laboratory studies do and do not tell us. In R. Lewicki, B. Sheppard, & M. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations: 117-138. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
51. Murnighan, K. 1978. Models of coalition behavior: Game theoretic, social psychological and political perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 85: 1130-1153.
52. Murnighan, K. 1986. Organizational coalitions: Structural contingencies and the formation process. In R. Lewicki, B. Sheppard, & M. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations: 155-173. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
53. Murnighan, K., & Brass, D. 1991. Intraorganizational coalitions. In R. Lewicki, B. Sheppard, & M. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations: 283-306. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
54. Neale, M. A., & Bazennan, M. H. 1991. Cognition and rationality in negotiation. New York: Free Press.
55. Neale, M. A., & Northcraft, G. B. 1986. Experts, amateurs, and refrigerators: Comparing expert and amateur decision making in a novel task. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 38: 228-241.
56. Neale, M. A., & Northcraft, G. B. 1990. Experience, expertise, and decision bias in negotiation: The role of strategic conceptualization. In B. Sheppard, M. Bazerman, & R. Lewicki (Eds.), Research in negotiation in organizations: 55-76. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
57. Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. 1987. Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39: 228-241.
58. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. 1977. Organizational design: The case for a coalitional model of organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 6(2): 15-29.
59. Pinkley, R. L., Brittain, J. W., Neale, M. A., & Northcraft, G. B. 1995. Managerial third-party dispute intervention: An inductive analysis of intervenor strategy selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80: 386-402.
60. Pruitt, D. G. 1981. Negotiation behavior. New York: Academic Press.
61. Raiffa, H. 1982. The art and science of negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
62. Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
63. Shaw, M. E. 1981. Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
64. Tajfel, H. 1982. Social psychology of intergroup relations. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual review of psychology, vol. 33: 1-39. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
65. Tajfel, H., Billig, R., Bundy, C., & Flament, C. 1971. Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2): 149-178.
66. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. 1986. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations: 7-24. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
67. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. 1959. The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
68. Thompson, L. 1990. Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 108: 515-532.
69. Turner, J. C. 1987. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
70. Valley, K., Neale, M. A., & Mannix, E. A. 1995. Relationships in negotiations: The role of reputation, the shadow of the future, and interpersonal knowledge on the process and outcome of negotiations. In R. J. Bies, R. Lewicki, & B. Sheppard (Eds.), Research in bargaining and negotiation in organizations: 65-93. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
71. Yukl, G., & Falbe, C. M. 1990. Influence tactics and objectives in upward, downward, and lateral influence attempts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 132-140.