The effect of correlated artifacts and true validity on the accuracy of parameter estimation in validity generalization

Personnel Psychology

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 453-465

  Raju, Nambury S ^a   Anselmi, Tobin V ^b   Goodman, Jodi S ^b   Thomas, Adrian ^b  

^a ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032220234     PISSN: 00315826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00733.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Callender JC, Osburn H. (1980). Development and test of a new model for validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 543-558.
2. Callender JC, Osburn HG, Greener JM, Ashworth S. (1982). Multiplicative validity generalization model: Accuracy of estimation as a function of sample size and mean, variance, and shape of the distribution of true validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 859-867.
3. Hedges LV. (1988). The meta-analysis of test validity studies: Some new approaches. In Wainer H, Braun HI (Eds.), Test validity (pp. 191-212). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. James LR, Demaree RG, Mulaik SA, Ladd RT. (1992). Validity generalization in the context of situational models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 3-14.
5. Law K, Schmidt FL, Hunter JE. (1994a). Nonlinearity of range corrections in meta-analysis: Test of an improved procedure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 425-438.
6. Law K, Schmidt FL, Hunter JE. (1994b). A test of two refinements in procedures for meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 978-986.
7. Mendoza JL, Reinhardt RN. (1991). Validity generalization procedures using sample-based estimates: A comparison of six procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 596-610.
8. Pearlman K, Schmidt FL, Hunter JE. (1980). Validity generalization results for tests used to predict job proficiency and training success in clerical occupations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 373-406.
9. Raju NS, Burke MJ. (1983). Two new procedures for studying validity generalization Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 382-395.
10. Raju NS, Burke MJ, Normand J, Langlois GM. (1991). A new meta-analytic approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 432-446.
11. Raju NS, Pappas S, Williams CP. (1989). An empirical Monte Carlo test of the accuracy of the correlation, covariance, and regression slope models for assessing validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 901-911.
12. Reinhardt RN, Mendoza JL. (1990, April). The effect of covariances between validity and reliabilities in validity generalization procedures. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.
13. Schmidt FL, Hunter JE. (1977). Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 529-540.
14. Schmidt FL, Gast-Rosenberg I, Hunter JE. (1980). Test of a model of validity generalization: Results for computer programmers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 643-661.
15. Schmidt FL, Law KS, Hunter JE, Rothstein HR, Pearlman K, McDaniel M. (1993). Refinements m validity generalization methods: Implications for situational specificity hypothesis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 3-12.