Student academic responding time as a function of classroom ecology and time of day

Journal of Special Education

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 411-424

  Muyskens, Paul ^a   Ysseldyke, James E ^b  

^a Minneapolis Public Schools   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032220159     PISSN: 00224669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/002246699803100401     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Algozzine, K. M., Morsink, C. V., & Algozzine, B. (1986). Classroom ecology in categorical special education classrooms: And so they counted the teeth in the horse. The Journal of Special Education, 20(2), 209-217.
2. Biggers, J. L. (1980). Body rhythms, the school day, and academic achievement. Journal of Experimental Education, 49(1), 45-47.
3. Blake, M. J. F. (1967). Time of day effects on performance in a range of tasks. Psychonomic Science, 9(6), 349-350.
4. Davis, Z. T. (1987a). Effects of time-of-day of instruction on beginning reading achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 80(3), 138-140.
5. Davis, Z. T. (1987b). The effects of time-of-day of instruction on eighth-grade students' English and mathematics achievement. The High School Journal, 71(2), 78-80.
6. Fisher, C. W., Marliave, R., & Filby, N. N. (1979). Improving teaching by increasing "academic learning time." Educational Leadership, 37, 52-54.
7. Folkard, S., Monk, T. H., Bradbury, R., & Rosenthall, J. (1977). Time of day effects in school children's immediate and delayed recall of meaningful material. British Journal of Psychology, 68, 45-50.
8. Gates, A. I. (1916). Variations in efficiency during the day, together with practice effects, sex differences, and correlations. University of California Publications in Psychology, 2, 1-156.
9. Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., Kamps, D., Terry, B., & Delquadri, J. (1994). Development and validation of standard classroom observation systems for school practitioners: Ecobehavioral assessment systems software (EBASS). Exceptional Children, 61, 197-1210.
10. Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J., & Hall, R. V. (1978). Code for instructional structure and student academic response: CISSAR. Kansas City, KS: University of Kansas, Bureau of Child Research, Juniper Gardens Children's Project.
11. Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J., & Hall, R. V. (1984). Opportunity to respond and student academic performance. In W. Heward, T. Heron, D. Hill, and J. TrapPorter (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education (pp. 58-88). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
12. Kleitman, N. (1963). Sleep and wakefulness. Chicago: University of Chicago.
13. Laird, D. A. (1925). Relative performance of college students as conditioned by time of day and day of week. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 8, 50-63.
14. Lionberger, S. O. (1985). Student engagement and its relationship to: Student achievement, gender, time of school day, difficulty of course, and type of class activity. (Doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, George Peabody College for Teachers, 1984). Dissertation Abstracts International, 46(3-A), 668-669.
15. Monk, T. H. (1987). Circadian rhythms in human performance and subjective activation. In A. Halaris (Ed.), Chronobiology and psychiatric disorders (pp. 241-262). New York: Elsevier Science.
16. Stanley, S. O., & Greenwood, C. R. (1981). CISSAR: Code for instructional structure and student academic response: Observer's manual. Kansas City, KS: University of Kansas, Bureau of Child Research, Juniper Gardens Children's Project.
17. Stanley, S. O., & Greenwood, C. R. (1983). Assessing opportunity to respond in classroom environments through direct observation: How much opportunity to respond does the minority, disadvantaged student receive in school? Exceptional Children, 49, 370-373.
18. Wender, P. H. (1973). Some speculation concerning a possible biochemical basis of minimal brain dysfunction. Annuals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 205, 18-28.
19. Winch, W. H. (1912a). Mental fatigue in day school children as measured by immediate memory. Part I. Journal of Educational Psychology, 3, 18-28.
20. Winch, W. H. (1912b). Mental fatigue in day school children as measured by immediate memory. Part II. Journal of Educational Psychology, 3, 75-82.
21. Ysseldyke, J. E., Christenson, S. L., Thurlow, M. T., & Skiba, R. (1987). Academic engagement and active responding of mentally retarded, learning disabled, emotionally disturbed and nonhandicapped elementary students (Research Report No. 4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Instructional Alternatives Project.
22. Ysseldyke, J. E., Thurlow, M. T., Christenson, S. L., & McVicar, R. (1987). Instructional grouping arrangements used with mentally retarded, learning disabled, emotionally disturbed and nonhandicapped students (Research Report No. 3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Instructional Alternatives Project.