Implications of the integral approach to quarterly reporting for the post-earnings-announcement drift

Accounting Review

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 353-371

  Rangan, Srinivasan ^a   Sloan, Richard G ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Earnings' time series properties; Integral approach to reporting; Market efficiency; Post earnings announcement drift

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032219961     PISSN: 00014826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Abarbanell, J. S., and V. L. Bernard. 1992. Tests of analysts' overreaction/underreaction to earnings information as an explanation for anomalous stock price behavior. Journal of Finance 67 (July): 1181-1207.
2. Accounting Principles Board (APB). 1973. Interim Financial Reporting. APB Opinion No. 28 New York, NY: APB.
3. Alford, A. W., and P. G. Berger. 1997. The association between analyst's underreaction to earnings and post-earnings-announcement drift. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
4. Bae, G. S., J. S. Hughes, and B. S. Lee. 1997. Investors' perceptions of earnings processes and post-announcement drifts. Working paper, Duke University, Durham, NC.
5. Ball, R., and E. Bartov. 1996. How naive is the stock market's use of earnings information? Journal of Accounting and Economics 21 (June): 319-337.
6. Bathke, A. W., and K. S. Lorek. 1984. The relationship between time series models and the security market's expectation of quarterly earnings. The Accounting Review 59 (April): 163-176.
7. Bernard, V. L, and J. K. Thomas. 1989. Post-earnings-announcement drift: Delayed price response or risk premium? Journal of Accounting Research 27 (Supplement): 1-48.
8. -, and -. 1990. Evidence that stock prices do not fully reflect the implications of current earnings for future earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 13 (December): 305-340.
9. Brown, L. D., and J. C. Han. 1997. Do stock prices fully reflect the implications of current earnings for future earnings for AR1 firms? Working paper, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.
10. Caligari, M., and N. Fargher. 1997. Evidence that prices do not reflect the implications of current earnings for future earnings: An experimental markets approach. Contemporary Accounting Research 14 (Fall): 397-433.
11. Chow, G. C. 1960. Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica 28: 591-605.
12. Collins, W. A., W. S. Hopwood, and J. C. McKeown. 1984. The predictability of interim earnings over alternative quarters. Journal of Accounting Research 22 (Autumn): 467-479.
13. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). 1974. Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 3. Stamford, CT: FASB.
14. -. 1977. FASB Interpretation No. 18. Accounting for Income Taxes in Interim Periods. Stamford, CT: FASB.
15. Foster, G. 1986. Financial Statement Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16. Lys, T., and L. Soffer. 1997. A closer look at post-earnings-announcement drift: The role of the dissemination of predictable information. Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
17. Maines, L. A., and J. R. Hand. 1996. Individuals' perceptions and misperceptions of the time-series properties of quarterly earnings. The Accounting Review 71 (July): 317-336.
18. Mendenhall, R. R., and W. D. Nichols. 1988. Bad news and differential market reactions to announcements of earlier-quarters vs. fourth-quarter earnings. Journal of Accounting Research 26 (Supplement): 63-90.
19. Mishkin, F. S. 1983. A Rational Expectations Approach to Macroeconometrics. National Bureau of Economic Research Monograph. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
20. Salamon, G. L., and T. L. Stober. 1994. Cross-quarter differences in stock price responses to earnings announcements: Fourth-quarter and seasonality influences. Contemporary Accounting Research 11 (Fall): 297-330.