Author perceptions of positive and negative editor behaviors in the manuscript review process

Journal of Social Behavior and Personality

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 1-22

  Street, Marc D ^a   Bozeman, Dennis P ^b   Whitfield, J Michael ^b  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032219796     PISSN: 08861641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Abramowitz, S.I., Gomes, B., & Abramowitz, C.V. (1975). Publish or politic: Referee bias in manuscript review. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5, 187-200.
2. Alreck, P.L., & Settle, R.B. (1995). The survey research handbook. Chicago: Irwin.
3. Anonymous, (1991). The publication game II: Editorial confrontation, or how to browbeat editors. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 1-6.
4. Bedeian, A.G. (1996a). Lessons learned along the way: Twelve suggestions for optimizing career success. In P.J. Frost & M.S. Taylor (Eds.). Rhythms of academic life, (pp. 3-9). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Bedeian, A.G. (1996b). Improving the journal review process: The question of ghostwriting. American Psychologist, 51, 1189.
6. Bornstein, R.F. (1991). Manuscript review in psychology: Psychometrics, demand characteristics, and an alternative model. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 12, 429-468.
7. Bradley, S.G. (1995). Conflict of interest. In Francis L. Macrina (Ed.). Scientific integrity: An introductory text with cases, (pp. 161-187) Washington, D.C.: ASM Press.
8. Campbell, J.P. (1995). Editorial: Some remarks from the outgoing editor. In L.L. Cummings & P.J. Frost (Eds.), Publishing in the organizational sciences (2nd ed.), (pp. 269-283). Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.
9. Crandall, R. (1986). Peer review: Improving editorial procedures. BioScience, 36, 607-609.
10. Crandall, R. (1987). We need research on what constitutes good journal papers-and good editing-not guesswork on how to improve manuscripts! American Psychologist, 42, 407.
11. Cummings, L.L., & Frost, P.J. (1985). Reflections on the experiences in an editor's chair: An analysis of reported experiences of journal editors in the organizational sciences. In L.L. Cummings & P.J. Frost (Eds)., Publishing in the organizational sciences, (pp. 379-468). Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
12. Cummings, L.L., & Frost, P.J. (Eds.) (1995). Publishing in the organizational sciences (second edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Epstein, S. (1995). What can be done to improve the journal review process. American Psychologist, 50, 883-885.
14. Filley, A., House, R.J., & Kerr, S. (1976). Managerial process and organizational behaviors. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
15. Fox, M.F. (1994). Scientific misconduct and editorial and peer review processes. Journal of Higher Education, 65, 298-309.
16. Garfield, E. (1985). Ghostwriting-The spectrum from ghostwriter to reviewer to editor to coauthor. Current Contents, 17, 3-11.
17. Gilliland, S.W. & Beckstein, B.A. (1996). Procedural and distributive justice in the editorial review process. Personnel Psychology, 49, 669-691.
18. Gomez-Mejia, L.R., & Balkin, D.B. (1992). Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 921-955.
19. Goodstein, L.D. (1982). When will the editors start to edit? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 212-213.
20. Hartley, J. (1987). A code of practice for refereeing journal articles. American Psychologist, 42, 959.
21. Kassirer, J.P., & Campion, E.W. (1994). Peer review: Crude and understudied. but indispensable. JAMA, 272, 96-97.
22. Kim, J., & Mueller, C.W. (1978). Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues. Newbury Park, CA.: Sage.
23. Knoll, E. (1990). The communities of scientists and journal peer review. JAMA, 263, 1330-1332.
24. Kreuger, R.Al (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25. Meyer, A.D. (1995). Balls, strikes, and collisions on the base path: Ruminations of a veteran reviewer. In L.L. Cummings & P.J. Frost (Eds)., Publishing in the organizational sciences (2nd ed.), (pp. 257-268). Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.
26. Morgan, D.L. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA.: Sage.
27. Peters, D.P. & Ceci, S.J. (1982). Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 187-255.
28. Rennie, D. (1993). More peering into editorial peer review. JAMA, 270, 2856-2858.
29. Rennie, D., Flanagin, A., & Glass, R.M. (1991). Conflicts of interest in the publication of science. JAMA, 266, 266-267.
30. Rousseau, D.M. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.
31. Sadowski, C.J. (1986). The collegial role of editors and reviewers. American Psychologist, 41, 1394.
32. Schneider, D.J. (1992). Publication games: Reflections on Reis and Stiller. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 498-503.
33. Sharp, D.W. (1990). What can and should be done to reduce publication bias?: The perspective of an editor. JAMA, 263, 1390-1391.
34. Smircich, L. (1985). Editorship and author-ity: Reflections from a special issue editor. In L.L. Cummings & P.J. Frost (Eds)., Publishing in the organizational sciences, (pp. 334-350). Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
35. Stevens, J. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.
36. Stewart, D.W., & Shamdasani, P.N. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA.: Sage.
37. Von Glinow, M.A. & Novelli, L. (1982). Ethical standards within organizational behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 25, 417-436.
38. Wagner, D.G. & Berger, J. (1993). Status characteristics theory: The growth of a program. In J. Berger & M. Zelditch, Jr. (Eds.), Theoretical research programs: Studies in the growth of theory (pp. 23-63). Stanford, CA.: Stanford University Press.
39. Weick, K.E. (1995). Editing innovation into Administrative Science Quarterly. In L.L. Cummings & P.J. Frost (Eds.)., Publishing in the organizational sciences (2nd ed.), (pp. 284-296). Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.