Projecting to the NAEP scale: Results from the North Carolina end-of-grade testing program

Journal of Educational Measurement

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 277-296

  Williams, Valerie S L ^a   Rosa, Kathleen Rees ^b   McLeod, Lori D ^c   Thissen, David ^b   Sanford, Eleanor E ^d  

^a NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c Law School Admission Council   (United States)

^d Metametrics Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032216874     PISSN: 00220655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1998.tb00539.x     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Beaton, A. E., & Gonzalez, E. J. (1993). Comparing the NAEP Trial State Assessment results with the IAEP international results. In Setting performance standards for student achievement: Background studies (pp. 371-397). Stanford, CA: National Academy of Education.
2. Bond, L., & Jaeger, R. M. (1993). Final report on the judged congruence between various statewide assessment tests in mathematics and the 1990 National Assessment of Educational Progress content frame for grade 8 mathematics. Greensboro, NC: Center for Educational Research and Evaluation, University of North Carolina.
3. Bloxom, B., Pashley, P., Nicewander, A., & Yan, D. (1995). Linking to a large-scale assessment: An empirical evaluation. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20, 1-26.
4. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.
5. Ercikan, K. (1993). Predicting NAEP. Unpublished manuscript.
6. Glaser, R., & Linn, R. (Eds.). (1992). Assessing student achievement in the states. Stanford, CA: National Academy of Education.
7. Glaser, R., & Linn, R. (Eds.). (1993). The Trial State Assessment: Prospects and realities. Stanford, CA: National Academy of Education.
8. Koretz, D., Linn, R., Dunbar, S., & Shepard, L. (1991, April). The effects of high-stakes testing on achievement: Preliminary findings about generalization across tests. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association and the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago, IL.
9. Linn, R. L. (1993). Linking results of distinct assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 6, 83-102.
10. Linn, R. L., & Kiplinger, V. L. (1993). Linking statewide tests to the National Assessment of Educational Progress: Stability of results. Boulder, CO: Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
11. Longford, N. L. (1995). Model-based methods for analysis of data from the 1990 NAEP Trial State Assessment. Research and Development Report. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Education Statistics.
12. Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Mislevy, R. J. (1991). Randomization-based inference about latent variables from complex samples. Psychometrika, 56, 177-196.
14. Mislevy, R. J. (1992). Linking educational assessments: Concepts, issues, methods, and prospects. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
15. Mislevy, R. J. (1993). Some formulas for use with Bayesian ability estimates. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 315-328.
16. Mislevy, R. J., Johnson, E. G., & Muraki, E. (1992). Scaling procedures in NAEP. Journal of Educational Statistics, 17, 131-154.
17. National Council on Education Standards and Testing. (1992). Raising standards for American education. Washington, DC: Author.
18. Pashley, P. J., & Phillips, G. W. (1993). Toward world class standards: A research study linking international and national assessments. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
19. Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley.
20. Sitter, R. R. (1992a). A resampling procedure for complex survey data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 755-765.
21. Sitter, R. R. (1992b). Comparing three bootstrap methods for survey data. The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 20, 135-154.
22. Williams, P. L., Reese, C. M., Campbell, J. R., Mazzeo, J., & Phillips, G. (1995). 1994 NAEP reading: A first look. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U. S. Department of Education.