The impact of spatial versus economic measures in an urban transportation plan

Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 541-555

  Verhetsel, Ann ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HIGHWAY TRAFFIC CONTROL; MASS TRANSPORTATION; PUBLIC POLICY; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE;

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION;

URBAN PLANNING;

METHODOLOGY; PLANNING METHOD; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; URBAN TRANSPORT;

BELGIUM;

EID: 0032216421     PISSN: 01989715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0198-9715(98)00050-7     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Banister, D. (1995). Transport and urban development. London: F&FN SPON.
2. Boyce, D. (1984). Urban transportation network-equilibrium and design models: Recent achievements and future prospects. Environment and Planning A, 16, 1445-1474.
3. Friesz, T. (1989). On the use of network-equilibrium models in urban and regional analysis: The emergence of dynamic concepts of equilibrium. Environment and Planning A, 21, 425-428.
4. Hall, P. (1995). A European perspective on the spatial links between land use, development and transport. In D. Banister (Ed.), Transport and urban development (pp. 65-88). London: F&FN SPON.
5. Hamilton, B. (1989). Wasteful commuting again. Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1497-1504.
6. Lave, C. (1994). The demand curve under road pricing and the problem of political feasibility. Transportation Research A, 28(2), 83-91.
7. Lawless, P., & Dabinett, G. (1995). Urban regeneration and transport investment: A research agenda. Environment and Planning A, 27, 1029-1048.
8. Macmillan, W. (1993). Urban and regional modelling: Getting it done and doing it right. Environment and Planning A, anniversary issue, 56-68.
9. Paaswell, R. (1995). ISTEA: infrastructure investment and land use. In D. Banister (Ed.), Transport and urban development (pp. 36-58). London: F&FN SPON.
10. Rodier, C. & Johnston, R. (1997). Incentives for local governments to implement travel demand management measures. Transportation Research A, 34(4), 295-308.
11. Rijkswaterstaat (1988). Het Randstadmodel. Verkeer en Vervoer in de randstad. Technische rapportage, Den Haag, Dienst Verkeerskunde - DHV.
12. Verhetsel, A. & Peetermans, E. (1997). De stedelijke randgebieden. Het Ruimtelijk Structuurplan Vlaanderen of wonen en werken in 2010 in het Antwerpse. Planologisch Nieuws, 17(1), 41-59.
13. Verhoef, E., Nijkamp, P., & Rietveld, P. (1995). The economics of regulatory parking policies: The (im)possibilities of parking policies in traffic regulation. Transportation Research A, 29A(2), 141-156.
14. Verhoef, E., Nijkamp, P., & Rietveld, P. (1996). The social feasibility of road pricing: A case study for the Randstad area. Discussion Paper TI5-95-7, Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam-Rotterdam.
15. Wegener, M. (1995). Accessibility and development impacts. In D. Banister (Ed.), Transport and urban development (pp. 157-161) London: F&FN SPON.