Tuning non-linear adaptive compensators in non-ideal noise environment

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 20, Issue 9, 1998, Pages 689-696

  Girard, A ^a,b   Mintchev, M P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ D'ORLÉANS   (France)

Author keywords

Adaptive compensation; Biomedical signal processing; Signal to noise ratio

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE ALGORITHMS; ADAPTIVE FILTERING; NONLINEAR FILTERING; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SIGNAL TO NOISE RATIO;

ADAPTIVE COMPENSATION; BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING;

ARTICLE; DIGITAL FILTERING; ENVIRONMENT; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIGNAL PROCESSING; TUNING CURVE;

ARTIFACTS; ELECTRODIAGNOSIS; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 0032216177     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1350-4533(98)00072-1     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. [1] Widrow B, Glover JR, McCool JM, Kaunitz J, Williams CS, Hearn RH, Zeidler JR, Dong E, Goodlin RC. Adaptive noise cancellation: principles and applications. Proc IEEE 1975;63:1692-716.
2. [2] Girard A, Mintchev MP. Testing non-linear adaptive compensators in non-ideal noise environment. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Systems, ISPACS'98, Melbourne, Australia, 1998.
3. [3] Chen J, Vanderwalle J, Sansen W, Vantrappen G, Janssens J. Adaptive method for cancellation of respiratory artifact in electrogastric measurements. Med Biol Engng Comput 1989;27:57-63.
4. [4] Philips W. Adaptive noise removal from biomedical signals using warped polynomials. IEEE Trans on BME 1996;43:480-92.
5. [5] Ferdjallah M, Barr RE. Adaptive digital notch filter design on the unit circle for the removal of powerline noise from biomedical signals. IEEE Trans on BME 1994;41:529-36.
6. [6] Sennels S, Biering-Sorensen F, Andersen OT, Hansen SD. Functional neuromuscular stimulation controlled by surface electromyographic signals produced by volitional activation of the same muscle: adaptive removal of the muscle response from the recorded EMG-signal. IEEE Trans on Rehab Engng 1997;5:195-206.
7. [7] Kentie MA, Van Der Schee EJ, Grashuis JL, Smout AJPM. Adaptive filtering of canine electrogastrographic signals, Part 1: system design. Med Biol Engng Comput 1981;19:759-64.
8. [8] Proakis JG, Manolakis DG. Digital signal processing: principles, alorithms, and applications. Prentice-Hall, NJ: Englewood Cliffs, 1996.
9. [9] Mintchev MP, Stickel A, Otto SJ, Bowes KL. Reliability of percent distribution of power of the electrogastrogram in recognizing gastric electrical uncoupling. IEEE Trans on BME 1997;44(12):1288-91.