Role of a procedure of environment impact assessment (EIA) in elaborating the integrated project of managing the barents sea coastal zones

Ocean and Coastal Management

Volumn 41, Issue 2-3, 1998, Pages 221-236

  Matishov, Gennadiy G ^a   Denisov, Vladimir V ^a   Kirillova, Yelena E ^a  

^a MURMANSK MARINE BIOLOGICAL INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

BARENTS SEA COASTAL ZONES; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT;

COASTAL ZONES;

COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; INTEGRATED APPROACH; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

BARENTS SEA;

EID: 0032214683     PISSN: 09645691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0964-5691(98)00066-0     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. [1] Coasts. UNESCO environment and development briefs, No. 6. UNESCO. 1993:16.
2. [2] Aibulatov NA, Mikhaylichenko YuG, Vartanov RV. Problems of the integrated coastal zone management of the russian seas. Proceedings of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Geographical Series. 1996;(6):94-104 (in Russian).
3. [3] Novikov RA. The problematics of integrated management of the sustainable development of the coastal zones. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 1996:28 (in Russian).
4. [4] Grishin NN. Main principles of the environment impact assessment and the home system of preparation and taking decisions. Ecol Expertise Environ Impact Assessment. 1996;(1):31-50 (in Russian).
5. [5] Biological resources of the Kola Peninsula coast (Current conditions and rational use). Apatity, 1995: 157 (in Russian).
6. [6] Nikitin BA. The state and perspectives of activities of RAO "Gazprom" on developing oil and gas resources of the Russian shelf. Proceedings second International Conference "RAO-95". Exploration of the Russian Arctic Shelf. 18-21 Sept. Saint-Petersburg, 1995:6-8. (in Russian).
7. [7] Ecological situation and the flora and fauna protection in the Barents Sea. Apatity, 1991:212 (in Russian).
8. [8] Rovinsky FYa, Chernogaeva GM, Paramonov SG. The modern state of the coastal ecosystems of the Russian Federation seas. Meteorol Hydrol 1995;(9):6-21 (in Russian).
9. [9] Matishov GG, Matishov DG, Schipa E, Rissanen K. Radionuclides in ecosystems of the Barents and Kara seas. Apatity, 1994:238 (in Russian).
10. [10] Ursul AD. The Russian statehood in a perspective of transition to the sustainable development. Rev Inform Problems Environ Natural Resources 1997;(1):1-74 (in Russian).
11. [11] GESAMP (IMO/UNESCO/IOC/WMO/WHO/IAEA/UN/UNEP Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection). The contributions of science to coastal zone management. Rome, 1996;(61):71.
12. [12] Scientific-methodological approaches to the Environment Impact Assessment of oil and gas production impact on ecosystems of the Arctic seas /as exemplified by the Shtokman Project. Apatity, 1997:393. (in Russian).
13. [13] Broadus JM, Vartanov RV, editors. The oceans and environmental security: shared US and Russian perspectives. Island Press: Washington, DC, Covelo, California, 1994:329.
14. [14] Kennedy AJ, editor. Cumulative effects assessment in Canada: from concept to practice. Calgary, 1994:334.
15. [15] Spaling H. In: Kennedy AJ, editor. Classification and evolution of methods for cumulative effects assessment/Cumulative effects assessment in Canada: from concept to practice. Calgary, 1994:47-65.
16. [16] Smith F. Biological diversity, ecosystem stability and economic development. Ecol Econ 1996:191-203.
17. [17] Watson RT, Zinyowera MC, Moss RH, editors. Climate change 1995: impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: scientific-technical analyses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995:537.
18. [18] De Graaf HJ, Musters CJM, Ter Keurs WJ. Sustainable development: looking for new strategies. Ecol Econ 1996:205-216.