The optimal joint provision of water for irrigation and hydropower

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 295-313

  Chatterjee, Bishu ^a   Howitt, Richard E ^b   Sexton, Richard J ^b  

^a Econ/Statistical Research Bureau   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROELECTRIC POWER; IRRIGATION; PROPERTY RIGHTS; SURFACE WATER; WATER SUPPLY;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 0032213450     PISSN: 00950696     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jeem.1998.1047     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Cordell H., Bergstrom J. Comparisons of recreational use values among alternative reservoir water level management scenarios. Water Resources Res. 21:1993;247-258.
2. Daubert J. T., Young R. A. Recreational demands for maintaining instream flows: A contingent valuation approach. Amer. J. of Agricultural Econom. 63:1981;666-676.
3. B. K. Edwards, S. J. Flaim, R. E. Howitt, Optimal provision of hydroelectric power under environmental and regulatory constraints, Land Econom. 75.
4. Gisser M., Lansford R., Gorman W., Creel B., Evans M. Water trade-off between electric energy and agriculture in the four corners area. Water Resources Res. 21:1979;529-538.
5. M. R. Goodall, J. D. Sullivan, T. De Young, Water districts in California: An analysis by type of enabling act and political decision process, California Department of Water Resources, March 1977.
6. Hamilton J. R., Whittlesey N. K., Halverson P. Interruptible water markets in the Pacific Northwest. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 71:1989;63-75.
7. S. Hatchett, Central Valley Project Improvement Act Programmatic Economic Impact Study, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1994.
8. Houston J. E., Whittlesey N. K. Modeling agricultural water markets for hydropower in the Pacific Northwest. Western J. Agricultural Econom. 11:1986;221-232.
9. Howitt R. E. Positive mathematical programming. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 77:1995;329-342.
10. Howitt R. E. A calibration method for agricultural economic production models. J. Agricultural Econom. 46:1995;147-159.
11. J. Jamieson, S. Sonenblum, W. Z. Hirsch, M. R. Goodall, H. Jaffe, Some Political and Economic Aspects of Managing California Water Districts, 190, Institute of Government and Public Affairs, University of California, Los Angeles, 1974.
12. Mays L. W. Water Resources Handbook. 1996;McGraw-Hill, New York.
13. McCarl B. A., Ross M. The costs borne by electricity consumers under expanded irrigation from the Columbia River. Water Resources Res. 15:1985;233-239.
14. McCarl B. A., Parandvash G. H. Irrigation development versus hydroelectric generation: Can interruptible irrigation play a role? Western J. Agricultural Econom. 13:1988;267-276.
15. Oven-Thompson K., Alercon L., Marks D. A. Agriculture vs. hydropower tradeoffs in the operation of the High Aswan Dam. Water Resources Res. 18:1982;1605-1613.
16. Paris Q. The von Liebig Hypothesis. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 74:1992;1019-1028.
17. Rosen M. D., Sexton R. J. Irrigation districts and water markets: An application of cooperative decision making theory. Land Econom. 69:1993;39-53.
18. Sexton R. J. The formation of cooperatives: A game-theoretic approach with implications for cooperative finance, decision making, and stability. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. 68:1986;214-225.
19. Simonovic S. The implicit stochastic model for reservoir yield optimization. Water Resources Res. 23:1987;2159-2165.
20. Smith R. T. Water transfers, irrigation districts, and the compensation problem. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 8:1989;446-465.
21. Ward F. A., Lynch T. P. Integrated river basin optimization: Modelling economic and hydrologic interdependence. Water Resources Bull. 32:1996;1127-1138.