Task and training requirements analysis methodology (TTRAM): An analytic methodology for identifying potential training uses of simulator networks in teamwork-intensive task environments

Ergonomics

Volumn 41, Issue 11, 1998, Pages 1678-1697

  Swezey, Robert W ^a   Owens, Jerry M ^a   Bergondy, Maureen L ^b   Salas, Eduardo ^b  

^a InterScience America   (United States)

^b NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Simulator networking; Team training; Training analysis

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; JOB ANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT SCIENCE; MILITARY AIRCRAFT; PERSONNEL TRAINING; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

SIMULATOR NETWORKING; TEAM TRAINING; TRAINING ANALYSIS;

ERGONOMICS;

AIRCRAFT; ARMY; ARTICLE; HUMAN; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; SIMULATOR; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEAMWORK; VOCATIONAL EDUCATION;

AVIATION; COMPUTER COMMUNICATION NETWORKS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; HUMANS; MILITARY PERSONNEL; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 0032212931     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/001401398186135     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ALLUISI, E. A. 1991, The development of technology for collective training: SIMNET, a case history, Human Factors, 33, 343-362.
2. ANDREWS, D. H., WAAG, W. L. and BELL, H. H. 1992, Training technologies applied to team training: military examples, in R.W. Swezey and E. Salas (eds), Teams: Their Training and Performance (Norwood, NJ: Ablex).
3. BERLINER, D. C., ANGELL, D. and SHEARER, J. 1964, Behaviors, measures, and instruments for performance evaluation in simulated environments. Paper delivered for a symposium and workshop on the Quantification of Human Performance, Albuquerque, New Mexico, August.
4. BOWERS, C. A., BAKER, P. and SALAS, E. 1994, Measuring the importance of teamwork: the reliability and validity of job/task analysis indices for team-training designs, Military Psychology, 6, 205-214.
5. BOWERS, C. A., MORGAN, B. B., JR, SALAS, E. and PRINCE, C. 1993, Assessment of coordination demand for aircrew coordination training, Military Psychology, 5, 95-112.
6. CANNON-BOWERS, J. A., TANNENBAUM, S. I., SALAS, E. and VOLPE, C. E. 1995, Defining team competencies: implications for training requirements and strategies, in R. Guzzo and E. Salas (eds), Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).
7. CHILDS, J. M. and SPEARS, W. D. 1986, Flight-skill decay and recurrent training, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62, 235-242.
8. DYER, J. L. 1984, Team research and team training: a state-of-the-art review, in F.A. Muckler (ed.), Human Factors Review (Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society), 285-323.
9. FARR, M. J. 1987, The Long-term Retention of Knowledge and Skills: A Cognitive and Instructional Perspective (Berlin: Springer-Verlag).
10. FORSYTH, D. R. 1983, An Introduction to Group Dynamics (Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole).
11. GARDLIN, G. R. and SITTERLEY, T. E. 1972, Degradation of learned skills: a review and annotated bibliography. Report D180-15080-1, Boeing, Seattle, WA.
12. HAGMAN J. D. and ROSE, A. M. 1983, Retention of military tasks: a review, Human Factors, 25, 199-213.
13. LANE, N. E. 1987, Skill Acquisition Rates and Patterns: Issues and Training Implications (Berlin: Springer-Verlag).
14. LEVINE, E. L., PENNER, L. A., BRANNICK, M. T., COOVERT, M. D. and LLOBET, J. M. 1988, Analysis of job/task analysis methodologies for team training design. Contract no. DAAL03-86-D-0001 Naval Training Systems Center, Orlando, FL.
15. MCRAE, A. V. 1966, Interaction content and team effectiveness, HUMRRO-TR-66-10, AD-637311. Human Resources Research Office, George Washington University, Alexandria, VA.
16. MORGAN, B. B., JR., GLICKMAN, A. S., WOODWARD, E. A., BLAIWES, A. S. and SALAS, E. 1986, Measurement of team behaviors in a Navy environment, Technical Report no. NTSC TR-86-014, Naval Training Systems Center, Orlando, FL.
17. OBRIEN, G. E. and OWENS, A. G. 1969, Effects of organizational structure on correlations between abilities and group productivity, Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 525-530.
18. SALAS, E. and CANNON-BOWERS, J. A. 1997, Methods, tools, and strategies for team training, in M.A. Quinones and A. Ehrenstein (eds), Training for 21st Century Technology: Applications of Psychological Research (Washington, DC: APA Press), 249-280.
19. SALAS, E., BOWERS, C. A. and CANNON-BOWERS, J. A. 1995, Military team research: ten years of progress, Military Psychology, 7, 55-76.
20. SANCHEZ, J. I. and LEVINE, E. L. 1989, Determining important tasks within jobs: a policy-capturing approach, Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 336-342.
21. SCHENDEL, J. D. and HAGMAN, J. D. 1982, On sustaining procedural skills over a prolonged retention interval, Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 605-610.
22. SCHENDEL, J. D., SHIELDS, J. L. and KATZ, M. S. 1978, Retention of motor skills: review, ARI Technical Paper 313, US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Alexandria, VA.
23. SHAW, M. E. 1976, Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior (New York: McGraw-Hill).
24. STREUFERT, S. and SWEZEY, R. W. 1986, Complexity, Managers and Organizations (New York: Academic Press).
25. SWEZEY, R. W. and LLANERAS, R. E. 1992, Validation of an aid for selection of instructional media and strategies, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74, 35.
26. SWEZEY, R. W. and LLANERAS, R. E. 1997, Models in training and instruction, in G. Salvendy (ed.), Handbook of Human Factors, 2nd edn. (New York: Wiley).
27. SWEZEY, R. W. and SALAS, E. 1992, Guidelines for designing team training systems, in R.W. Swezey and E. Salas (eds), Teams: Their Training and Performance (Norwood, NJ: Ablex).
28. SWEZEY, R. W., MELTZER, A. L. and SALAS, E. 1994, Issues involved in motivating teams, in H.F. O'Neil, Jr. and M. Drillings, (eds), Motivation: Theory and Research (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum), 141-170.
29. WEAVER, J. L., BOWERS, C. A., SALAS, E. and CANNON-BOWERS, J. A. 1995, Networked simulations: new paradigms for team performance research, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 27, 12-24.