The economic impact of a subsidy on Mexican grains and forestry: A CGE analysis

Forest Science

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 578-586

  Boyd, Roy ^a   Doroodian, Khosrow ^a  

^a OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Pro Campo; Sectoral analysis; Simulation; Welfare

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; BIODEGRADATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COSTS; CULTIVATION; ECONOMICS; FORESTRY; GRAIN (AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT); INDUSTRY; MANUFACTURE; MINING; PUBLIC POLICY;

COMPUTABLE GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS; GOVERNMENT SUBSIDY; SECTORAL ANALYSIS;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

EID: 0032212053     PISSN: 0015749X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. ARMINGTON, P. 1969. A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. IMF Staff Pap. P. 159-178.
2. BALLARD, C.L., D. FULLERTON, J.B. SHOVEN, AND J. WHALLEY. 1985. A general equilibrium model for tax policy evaluation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 264 p.
3. BANCO DE MEXICO. 1993. The Mexican economy 1993: Economic and financial developments in 1992, policies for 1993. Mexico City, Mexico.
4. BARBIER, E.B., AND J.C. BURGESS. 1994. Economic analysis of deforestation in Mexico. Working pap. 9406. Helsington, York, Dep. of Environ. Econ. and Environ. Manage. York, England.
5. BERGMAN, L. 1991. General equilibrium effects of environmental policy: A CGE-modeling approach. Environ. Resour. Econ. 1(2):43-61.
6. BAUMOL, W., AND W. OATES. 1988. The theory of environmental policy. Ed. 2. New York, Cambridge University Press.
7. BOYD, R., AND D. NEWMAN. 1991. Tax reform and land-using sectors in the U.S. economy: A general equilibrium analysis. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 73(2): 398-404.
8. DOROODIAN, K., AND R. BOYD. 1996. The Impact of removing corn subsidies in Mexico: A general equilibrium assessment. Dep. of Econ., Ohio University, Athens, OH.
9. HARBERGER, A.C. Taxation. 1964. Resource allocation, and welfare, the role of direct and indirect taxes in the federal reserve system. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
10. HEUTER, J. 1997. Estimation of substitution elasticities in Mexican agriculture: A translog cost function analysis. Master's paper. Dep. of Econ., Ohio University, Athens, OH.
11. HINOJOSA-OJEDA, R., AND SHERMAN ROBINSON. 1991. Alternative scenarios of U.S.-Mexico integration: A computable general equilibrium approach. Work. pap. no. 609. Dep. of Agric. and Resour. Econ. Univ. of California at Berkeley.
12. INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND. International financial statistics. Washington, D.C. Various issues.
13. RESOSUDARMO, R., AND E. THORBECKE. 1995. The impact of environmental management on household incomes for different socio-economic classes: The case of air pollutants in Indonesia. Draft. Dep. of Agric., Resour. and Manager. Econ., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.
14. SHOVEN, J.B., AND JOHN WHALLEY. 1992. Applying general equilibrium. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
15. SHOVEN, J.B., AND JOHN WHALLEY. 1984. Applied general equilibrium models of taxation and international trade, J. Econ. Lit. 21(3):1007-1051.
16. SKUTA, D. 1997. Estimation of substitution elasticities in Mexican manufacturing: A translog cost function analysis. Master's paper. Dep. of Econ., Ohio University, Athens, OH.
17. WORLD BANK. 1989. Mexico-agricultural sector report. Washington, DC.
18. WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE. 1992. World resources 1990-1991. Oxford University Press, New York.