Comparison of enrichment methods for recovery and chick infectivity of chlorine-injured Salmonella enteritidis

Journal of Food Protection

Volumn 61, Issue 11, 1998, Pages 1504-1506

  Sarlin, Laura L ^a   Barnhart, Eric T ^a   Moore, Randle W ^b   Corrier, Donald E ^c   Stanker, Larry H ^c   Hargis, Billy M ^a,b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHICKEN; CHLORINE; CULTURE MEDIUM; ENRICHMENT CULTURE; INFECTIVITY;

ENTERITIDIS; GALLUS GALLUS; SALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS;

EID: 0032211512     PISSN: 0362028X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-61.11.1504     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Andrews, W. H. 1986. Resuscitation of injured Salmonella spp. and coliforms from foods. J. Food Prot. 49:62-75.
2. Bailey, J. S., and N. A. Cox. 1992. Universal preenrichment broth for the simultaneous detection of Salmonella and Listeria in foods. J. Food Prot. 55:256-259.
3. Busse, M. 1995. Media for Salmonella. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 26:117-131.
4. Cox, N. A., J. S. Bailey, L. C. Blankenship, R. J. Meinersmann, N. J. Stern, and F. McHan. 1990. Fifty percent colonization dose for Salmonella typhimurium administered orally and intracloacally to young broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 69:1809-1812.
5. Cox, N. A., A. J. Mercuri, D. A. Tanner, M. O. Carson, J. E. Thomson and J. S. Bailey. 1978. Effectiveness of sampling methods for Salmonella detection on processed broilers. J. Food Prot. 41:341-343.
6. D'Aoust, J. Y., A. M. Sewell, and D. W. Warburton. 1992. A comparison of standard cultural methods for the detection of foodborne Salmonella. Int. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 16:41-50.
7. Edel, W., and E. H. Kampelmacher. 1973. Comparative studies on the isolation of "sublethally injured" salmonellae in nine European laboratories. Bull. World Health Organ. 48:167-174.
8. Guthrie, R. K. 1992. Salmonella, p. 63-73. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Fla.
9. Lee, C. A., and S. Falkow. 1990. The ability of Salmonella to enter mammalian cells is affected by bacterial growth state. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:4304-4308.
10. Mackey, B. M., and C. M. Derrick. 1982. A comparison of solid and liquid media for measuring the sensitivity of heat-injured Salmonella typhimurium to selenite and tetrathionate media, and the time to recover resistance. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 53:233-242.
11. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services. August 1989. National poultry improvement plan and auxiliary provisions, publication APHIS 91-40. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
12. Patil, M. D. and N. M. Parhad. 1986. Growth of salmonellas in different enrichment media. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 61:19-24.
13. Pignato, S., A. M. Marino, M. C. Emanuele, V. Iannotta, S. Caracappa, and G. Giamanco. 1995. Evaluation of new culture media for rapid detection and isolation of salmonellae in foods. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:1996-1999.
14. Pless, P., and R. Reissbrodt. 1995. Improvement of Salmonella detection on motility enrichment media by ferrioxamine E-supplementation of pre-enrichment culture. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 27:147-159.
15. Schleifer, J. H., B. J. Juven, C. W. Beard, and N. A. Cox. 1984. The susceptibility of chicks to Salmonella in artificially contaminated poultry feed. Avian Dis. 28:497-503.
16. van der Zee, H. 1994. Conventional methods for the detection and isolation of Salmonella enteritidis. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 21:41-46.
17. Zar, J. 1984. Biostatistical analysis, 2nd ed., p. 348-351. Prentice. Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.