Medicaid and managed care: Meeting the reproductive health needs of low-income women

Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

Volumn 4, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 13-22

  Salganicoff, Alina ^a   Delbanco, Suzanne F ^a,b  

^a HENRY J KAISER FAMILY FOUNDATION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Managed care; Medicaid; Women s health services

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ECONOMICS; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MEDICAID; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; MANAGED CARE PROGRAMS; MEDICAID; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; UNITED STATES; WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES;

EID: 0032209579     PISSN: 10784659     EISSN: 15505022     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00124784-199811000-00004     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Care Financing Administration. Medicaid Managed Care Enrollment Report, Summary Statistics as of June 30, 1997. Baltimore, MD.: Health Care Financing Administration, 1998.
2. Delbanco, S., and Smith, M.D. Reproductive Health and Managed Care—An Overview. Western Journal of Medicine 163 (supplement to no. 3) (1995): 1-6.
3. Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured. Unpublished estimate based on Urban Institute analysis of the March 1996 Current Population Survey, Bureau of the Census.
4. Henshaw, S.K. Unintended Pregnancy in the United States. Family Planning Perspectives 30, no. 1 (1998): 24-29, 46.
5. Jones, E.F., and Forrest, J.D. Contraceptive Failure Rates Based on the 1988 NSFG. Family Planning Perspectives 12, no. 1 (1992): 12-19.
6. Forrest, J.D., and Frost, J.J. The Family Planning Attitudes and Experiences of Low-lncome Women. Family Planning Perspectives 28, no. 6 (1996): 246-255.
7. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 1995. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1996.
8. Devesa, S.S., and Diamond, E.L. Association of Breast Cancer and Cervical Cancer Incidences with Income and Education Among Whites and Blacks. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 65, no. 3 (1990): 515-528.
9. Krieger, N. Social Class and the Black A White Crossover in the Age-Specific Incidence of Breast Cancer: A Study Linking Census-Derived Data to Population-Based Registry Records. American Journal of Epidemiology 131, no. 5 (1990): 804-814.
10. Ayanian, J.X., et al. The Relationship Between Health Insurance Coverage and Clinical Outcome Among Women with Breast Cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine 329, no. 5 (1993): 326-31.
11. Levine, R.E., and Tsoflias, L. Publicly Supported Family Plan-ning in the United States. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute and Child Trends, Inc., 1994.
12. The Alan Guttmacher Institute. The Status of Major Abortion-Related Laws in the States. New York: The Alan Guttmacher Institute, 1998.
13. Lyons, B., et al. Poverty, Access to Health Care, and Medic-aid’s Critical Role for Women. In Women’s Health, The Commonwealth Fund Survey, ed. Falik, M.M., and Collins, K.S. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.
14. Frost, J.J., and Bolzan, M. The Provision of Public-Sector Services by Family Planning Agencies in 1995. Family Planning Perspectives 29, no. 1 (1997): 6-14.
15. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Care Financing Administration, Medicaid Bureau. Medicaid Statistics, Program and Financial Statistics, Fiscal Year 1995. Pub. No. 10129. Washington, D.C.: HCFA, 1996.
16. National Governors’ Association. State Medicaid Coverage of Pregnant Women and Children. MCH Update. Washington, DC: National Governors’ Association, 1997.
17. Salganicoff, A. Access to Health Care for Low-Income Women: Impact of Medicaid and Private Insurance. Presentation to the Restructuring Health Care for the Poor: Conference of the Kaiser Commonwealth Low-Income Coverage and Access Project. Washington, D.C., June 1997.
18. The Center for Reproductive Law and Policy. Removing Barriers Improving Choices, A Case Study in Reproductive Health Services and Managed Care. New York: The Center for Reproductive Law and Policy, Inc., 1996.
19. Donovan, P. The Politics of Blame, Family Planning, Abortion and the Poor. New York: The Alan Guttmacher Institute, 1995.
20. Kaiser Commission on the Future of Medicaid. Medicaid and Managed Care. Medicaid Facts, December 1997.
21. Rosenbaum, S., et al. Beyond the Freedom to Choose Medicaid, Managed Care, and Family Planning. The Western Journal of Medicine 163 (supplement to no. 3) (1995): 33-38.
22. Rosenbaum et al. Medicaid Managed Care and the Family Planning Free-Choice Option: Beyond the Freedom to Choose. Journal of Health Policy, Policy Politics and Law 22, no. 5 (1997): 1191-1214.
23. Murray, M. Medicaid and Expanded Family Planning 1115 Waivers. Working Paper of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget, 1997.
24. Armstead, R.C., and Gorman, J.K. Baby Love and Budget Re-lief: Some Promising Practices in Prenatal Managed Care in Medicaid. JAMA 50, no. 5 (1995): 178-181.
25. United States General Accounting Office. Medicaid Prenatal Care: States Improve Access and Enhance Services, But Face New Challenges. GAO/HEHS-94-152BR, Washington, D.C.: GAO, 1994.
26. Shulman, E., et al. Primary Care Case Management and Birth Outcomes in the Iowa Medicaid Program. American Journal of Public Health 87, no. 1 (1997): 80-84.
27. Goldfarb, N., et al. Impact of a Mandatory Medicaid Case Management Program on Prenatal Care and Birth Outcomes: A Retrospective Analysis. Medical Care 29, no. 1 (1991): 64-71.
28. Rowland, D., et al. Medicaid and Managed Care Lessons from the Literature. Washington, D.C.: Kaiser Commission on the Future of Medicaid, 1995.
29. Rosenbaum, S., et al. Negotiating the New Health System: A Nationwide Analysis of Medicaid Managed Care Contracts. Washington, D.C.: George Washington University Center For Health Policy Research, February 1997.
30. Celum, C.L., et al. Where Would Clients Seek Care for STD Services Under Health Care Reform? Results of a STD Client Survey from Five Clinics. Eleventh Meeting of the Interna-tional Society for STD Research, August 27-30, 1995. New Orleans, LA [abstract no. 101].
31. Bernstein, A.B., et al. Women’s Reproductive Health Services in Health Maintenance Organizations. Western Journal of Medicine 163, supplement to no. 3 (1995): 15-18.
32. Weisman, C.S., et al. Women’s Health Centers and Managed Care. Women’s Health Issues 6, no. 5 (1996): 255-263.
33. Kaiser Family Foundation/Glamour National Survey/Prince-ton Survey Research Associates. 1997. Survey of Women about Their Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Regarding Reproductive Health. Menlo Park, Ca.: Kaiser Family Foundation, 1997.
34. Kaiser Family Foundation/Glamour National Survey. Talking about STDs with Health Professionals: Women’s Experiences. Menlo Park, Ca.: Kaiser Family Foundation, 1997.
35. National Committee for Quality Assurance. HEDIS 3.0., Health Plan Employer Data & Information Set. Washington, D.C.: National Committee for Quality Assurance, 1997.
36. McGlynn, E.A. Quality Assessment of Reproductive Health Services. Western Journal of Medicine 163 (supplement to no. 3) (1995): 19-27.
37. Gold, M., et al. Medicaid Managed Care: Lessons from Five States. Health Affairs 15, no. 3 (1996): 153-166.
38. Short, P.F. Medicaid’s Role in Insuring Low-Income Women. New York: The Commonwealth Fund, 1996.