Removing barriers and improving choices: A Case Study in Reproductive Health Services and Managed Care

Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

Volumn 4, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 23-31

  Gordon, Shirley G ^a  

^a Gordon and Gordon Associates   (United States)

Author keywords

Appropriate care; Confidentiality; Managed care; Timely access

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; ECONOMICS; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MEDICAID; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; HEALTH PLAN IMPLEMENTATION; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; MANAGED CARE PROGRAMS; MEDICAID; NEW YORK; UNITED STATES; WOMEN'S HEALTH SERVICES;

EID: 0032209267     PISSN: 10784659     EISSN: 15505022     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00124784-199811000-00005     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Institute of Medicine. The Best Intentions: Unintended Pregnancy and the Well-being of Children and Families. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1995.
2. Center for Reproductive Law and Policy. Removing Barriers, Improving Choices: A Case Study in Reproductive Health Services and Managed Care, New York: Center for Reproductive Law and Policy, 1996.
3. Office of the Public Advocate for the City of New York. Managed Confusion: How HMO Marketing Materials are Tricking The Elderly and The Poor. 1995.
4. Office of Quality Assurance and Audit, Metropolitan Regional Office, New York State Department of Social Services. MHS Marketing Review. HIP Marketing Review, Oxford Marketing Review, Metropolitan Marketing Review, U.S. Healthcare Marketing Review. 1994-1995.
5. Havemann, J. New York Finds Bumps on the Road to HMOs: 13 Plans Fail to Meet Standards in State Probe. The Washington Post. December 19, 1995, p. A22.
6. Office of Quality Assurance and Audit, Metropolitan Regional Office, New York State. Department of Social Services. Southwest Brooklyn Managed Care Program Compliance Re-view of the Freedom of Choice Waiver Requirements Issues By the Health Care Financing Administration of the United States Department of Health and Human Services. 1994.
7. Community Service Society of New York. Knowledge Cap: What Medicaid Beneficiaries Understand—And What They Don’t About Managed Care. A Survey of Medicaid Recipients in the South Bronx and Harlem. New York: Community Service Society of New York, 1996.
8. Blum, RW., et al. Don’t Ask, They Won’t Tell: The Quality of Adolescent Health Screening in Five Practice Settings. American Journal of Public Health 86, no. 12 (1996): 1767-1772.
9. Millstein, S.G., et al. Delivery of STD/HIV Preventive Services to Adolescents by Primary Care Physicians. Journal of Adolescent Health 19 (1996): 249-257.
10. Kaiser Family Foundation. The Clamour, Kaiser Family Foundation, Princeton Survey Research Associates Survey Women about their Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Regarding their Reproductive Health. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation, 1997.
11. Planned Parenthood of New York City. Do Managed Care Organizations Inform Members About Free Access and Direct Access Laws? Reproductive Health and Managed Care Policy Series. Report I. New York: Planned Parenthood of New York City, 1997.
12. Planned Parenthood of New York City. The Transition to Managed Care: Experiences of Planned Parenthood Patients. Reproductive Health and Managed Care Policy Series, Report 2. New York: Planned Parenthood of New York City, 1997.
13. Mathmatica Policy Research, Inc. Reforming State Medicaid Programs. First-Year Implementation Experience from Three States. Princeton, NJ: 1997.
14. Pear, R. 3 Big Health Plans Join in Call for National Standards. New York Times. September 25, 1997, p. A28.
15. Fein, EB. New York Stops Forcing the Poor Into Managed Care. New York Times. September 29, 1995, p. A1.