Fatigue behavior of rubber-modified pavements

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1639, 1998, Pages 73-82

  Raad, Lutfi ^a   Saboundjian, Stephan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASPHALT PAVEMENTS; CONCRETE PAVEMENTS; ENERGY DISSIPATION; FATIGUE OF MATERIALS; STIFFNESS; STRAIN; STRESS ANALYSIS;

FLEXURE STRAIN; RUBBERIZED PAVEMENTS;

PAVEMENTS;

EID: 0032209086     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1639-08     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Raad, L., S. Saboundjian, and X. Yuan. Fatigue Properties of Rubber Modified Pavements. Report INE/TRC 94.25. Transportation Research Center, Institute of Northern Engineering, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, 1995.
2. Raad, L., and S. Saboundjian. Fatigue Behavior of Rubber Modified Pavements. Report INE/TRC 97.06. Transportation Research Center, Institute of Northern Engineering, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, 1997.
3. Esch, D. Construction and Benefits of Rubber-Modified Asphalt Pavements. In Transportation Research Record 860, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1982, pp. 5-13.
4. Takallou, H., G. Hicks, and D. Esch. Use of Rubber-Modified Asphalt Pavements in Cold Regions. Presented at Paving in Cold Areas Workshop, Ottawa, Ontario, 1987.
5. Saboundjian, S., and L. Raad. Performance of Rubberized Asphalt Mixes in Alaska. In Transportation Research Record 1583, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 52-61.
6. Charania, E., J. H. Cano, and R. H. Schnormeier. Twenty-Year Study of Asphalt Rubber Pavements in Phoenix, Arizona. In Transportation Research Record 1307, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 29-38.
7. Zanieski, J. Summary of Arizona Department of Transportation Experience with Asphalt Rubber. Report FHWA-AZ88-818, Arizona Department of Transportation, 1988.
8. Kano, J. O., and E. Charania. The Phoenix Experience Using Asphalt-Rubber. Proc., National Seminar on Asphalt Rubber, Asphalt Rubber Producers Group, Kansas City, Mo., 1989.
9. Scofield, L. The History, Development, and Performance of Asphalt Rubber at ADOT. Report AZ-SP-8902. Arizona Department of Transportation, 1989.
10. Doty, R. N. Flexible Pavement Rehabilitation Using Asphalt-Rubber Combinations. In Transportation Research Record 1196, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 212-223.
11. Van Kirk, J. Caltrans' Experience with Asphalt Rubber Concrete: An Overview and Future Direction. Proc., National Seminar on Asphalt Rubber, Asphalt Rubber Producers Group, Kansas City, Mo., 1989.
12. Larsen, D. A. Eight-Year Performance Evaluation of an Asphalt-Rubber Hot Mix Pavement. Proc., National Seminar on Asphalt Rubber, Asphalt Rubber Producers Group, Kansas City, Mo., 1989.
13. Page, G. Florida's Experience Utilizing Ground Tire Rubber in Asphalt Concrete Mixtures. Proc., National Seminar on Asphalt Rubber, Asphalt Rubber Producers Group, Kansas City, Mo., 1989.
14. Ruth, B. Executive Summary of Information Compiled from Investigations and Demonstration Projects Pertaining to the Use of Ground Tire Rubber in Highway Construction. Report FDOT 99700-7520-010. Gainesville Engineering and Industrial Experiment Station, University of Florida, 1990.
15. Constantino, P., M. P. Abraham, and D. Murray. Evaluation of Asphalt-Rubber Overlay of Old Concrete. Asphalt Rubber Producers Group, Sterling, Mass. 1991.
16. Allen, H. S., and C. M. Turgeon. Evaluation of PlusRide (Trademark), A Rubber Modified Plant Mixed Bituminous Surface Mixture. Report 90-01. Minnesota Department of Transportation, 1990.
17. Lynch, D. F., and R. P. Northwood. The Waste Tire Paving Demonstration Project at Thamesville, Ontario. Proc., TAC Annual Conference, Vol. 6, Winnipeg, Manitoba, 1992.
18. Texas Asphalt Rubber Survey. Asphalt Rubber Producers Group, Sterling, Mass., 1991.
19. Estakhri et al. Use, Availability and Cost-Effectiveness of Asphalt Rubber in Texas. Report TX-91/1902-1F. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, 1990.
20. Anderson, K. W., and N. W. Jackson. Rubber Asphalt Pavements in the State of Washington. Report WA-RD 268.1. Washington State Department of Transportation, 1992.
21. Hoyt, D., R. Lytton, and F. Roberts. Performance Prediction and Cost Effectiveness of Asphalt-Rubber Concrete in Airport Pavements. In Transportation Research Record 1207, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 88-99.
22. Raad, L., S. Saboundjian, and J. Corcoran. Remaining Fatigue Life Analysis: A Comparison Between Conventional Asphalt Concrete-Dense Graded and Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix-Gap Graded. In Transportation Research Record 1388, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 97-107.
23. Coetzee, N. F., and K. Kaelber. Fatigue Characterization of Alaskan Paving Materials. Report to Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities. Institute of Northern Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 1988.
24. Shook, J., F. Finn, M. Witczak, and C. Monismith. Thickness Design of Asphalt Pavements - The Asphalt Institute Method. Proc., 5th International Conference on Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements, Delft, The Netherlands, 1982.
25. Strategic Highway Research Program. Fatigue Response of Asphalt-Aggregate Mixes. Report SHRP-A-404. National Research Council. Washington, D.C., 1994.