Operational analysis of uninterrupted bicycle facilities

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1636, 1998, Pages 29-36

  Allen, D Patrick ^a   Rouphail, Nagui ^b   Hummer, Joseph E ^b   Milazzo II, Joseph S ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION   (United States)

^b North Carolina State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BICYCLES; HIGHWAY PLANNING; STREET TRAFFIC CONTROL;

UNINTERRUPTED BICYCLE FACILITIES;

NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 0032208788     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1636-05     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Special Report 209: Highway Capacity Manual. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994.
2. Zeeger, C., et al. The National Bicycle and Walking Study: Transportation Choices for a Changing America. Report FHWA-PD-94-023. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1994.
3. Bicycle Planning and Facility Workshop. Northwestern University Traffic Institute, Evanston, Ill., May 1994.
4. Wilkinson, W. C., A. Clarke, B. Epperson, and R. Knoblauch. Selecting Roadway Design Treatments to Accommodate Bicycles. Report FHWA-RD-92-073. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1994.
5. Hunter, W. W., and H. F. Huang. User Counts on Bicycle Lanes and Multi-use Trails in the United States. In Transportation Research Record 1502, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 45-57.
6. Niemeier, D. A. Longitudinal Analysis of Bicycle Count Variability: Results and Modeling Implications. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 122, No. 3, May-June 1996.
7. Botma, H., and H. Papendrecht. Traffic Operation of Bicycle Traffic. In Transportation Research Record 1320, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 65-74.
8. Sign Up for the Bike: Design Manual for a Cycle-Friendly Infrastructure. Centre for Research and Contract Standardization in Civil and Traffic Engineering, Netherlands, Sept. 1994.
9. Miller, R. E., and M. R. Ramey. Width Requirements for Bikeways: A Level of Service Approach. Report 75-4. Department of Civil Engineering University of California, Davis, Dec. 1975.
10. Brilon, W. A New German Highway Capacity Manual. Proc., 2nd International Symposium on Highway Capacity, Vol. 1, Sydney, Australia, Aug. 1994.
11. Vagverk, S. Chapter 10: Bicycle Traffic Facilities (English translation). In Swedish Capacity Manual. National Swedish Road Administration, 1977.
12. Yang, J.-M. Bicycle Traffic in China. Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 39, No. 1, Jan. 1985.
13. City Planning for Cycling. Directorate of Public Roads, Norwegian Public Roads Administration, Oslo, Dec. 1995.
14. Navin, F. P. D. Bicycle Traffic Flow Characteristics: Experimental Results and Comparisons. ITE Journal, Vol. 64, No. 3, March 1994.
15. Homburger, W. S. Capacity of Bus Routes, and of Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley, Feb. 1976.
16. Opiela, K. S., S. Khasnabis, and T. K. Datta. Determination of the Characteristics of Bicycle Traffic at Urban Intersections. In Transportation Research Record 743, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1980, pp. 30-36.
17. Safety and Locational Criteria for Bicycle Facilities, User Manual Volume II: Design and Safety Criteria. Report FHWA-RD-75-114. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1976.
18. Lui, Y. The Capacity of Highway with a Mixture of Bicycle Traffic. In Highway Capacity and Level of Service. Rotterdam, Netherlands, 1991.
19. Liu, X., L. D. Shen, and F. Ren. Operational Analysis of Bicycle Interchanges in Beijing, China. In Transportation Research Record 1396, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 18-21.
20. Wei, H., J. Huang, and J. Wang. Models for Estimating Traffic Capacity on Urban Bicycle Lanes. Presented at 76th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., Jan. 1997.
21. Botma, H. Method to Determine Levels of Service for Bicycle Paths and Pedestrian-Bicycle Paths. In Transportation Research Record 1502, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 38-44.
22. Guide for Development of Bicycle Facilities. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 1991.
23. Ferrara, T. C. A Study of Two-Lane Intersections and Crossings Under Combined Motor Vehicle and Bicycle Demands. Report 75-5. Civil Engineering Department, University of California, Davis, Dec. 1975.
24. Stembord, H. Capacity Research and Applications: Country Report of the Netherlands. Proc., 1991 International Symposium on Highway Capacity, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 1991.
25. Maryland State Highway Administration. Evaluation of Wide Curb Lanes as Shared Lane Bicycle Facilities. Report FHWA/MD-85/06. Maryland Department of Transportation, Baltimore, Aug. 1985.
26. Botma, H., and H. Papendrecht. Operational Quality of Traffic on a Bicycle Path. ITE 1993 Compendium of Technical Papers, 1993.
27. Rouphail, N., J. E. Hummer, D. P. Allen, and J. S. Milazzo. A Floating Bicycle Methodology to Determine Frequencies of Events on Bicycle Paths. Working paper. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 1997.