Differences among speakers in lingual articulation for American English /02B4/

Speech Communication

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 203-226

  Westbury, John R ^a   Hashi, Michiko ^a   Lindstrom, Mary J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

American English 02B4 ; Articulation; Cross speaker variation; Tongue posture

Indexed keywords

SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH PROCESSING; SPEECH SYNTHESIS;

AUTOMATIC SPEECH RECOGNITION; LINGUAL ARTICULATION;

SPEECH RECOGNITION;

EID: 0032207115     PISSN: 01676393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6393(98)00058-2     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Alwan, A., Narayanan, S., Haker, K., 1997. Toward articulatory-acoustic models for liquid approximants based on MRI and EPG data. Part II. The rhotics. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 101, 1078-1089.
2. Andersen, T.W., 1984. An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York.
3. Becker, R.A., Chambers, J.M., Wilks, A.R., 1988. The New S Language: A Programming Environment for Data Analysis and Graphics. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
4. Bell-Berti, F., Harris, K., 1981. A temporal model of speech production. Phonetica 38, 9-20.
5. Blackburn, C.S., Young, S.J., 1996. Pseudo-articulatory speech synthesis for recognition using automatic feature extraction from x-ray data. In: Bunnell, H.T., Idsardi, W. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Spoken Language Processing, Philadelphia, 3-6 October 1996. Citation Delaware, New Castle, Delaware, pp. 969-972.
6. Boyce, S., Espy-Wilson, C.Y., 1997. Coarticulatory stability in American English/r/. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 101, 3741-3753.
7. Browman, C., Goldstein, L., 1992. Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica 49, 155-180.
8. Delattre, P., Freeman, D., 1968. A dialect study of American R's by x-ray motion picture. Linguistics 44, 29-68.
9. Dembowski, J., Lindstrom, M.J., Westbury, J.R., 1998. Articulator point variability in the production of stop consonants. In: Cannito, M., Yorkston, K., Beukelman, D. (Eds.), Neuromotor Speech Disorders: Nature, Assessment, and Management. Paul H. Brookes Publishing, Baltimore, MD, pp. 27-46.
10. Edwards, J., Harris, K., 1990. Rotation and translation of the jaw during speech. J. Speech Hear. Res. 33, 550-562.
11. Espy-Wilson, C.Y., Narayanan, S., Boyce, S.E., Alwan, A., 1997. Acoustic modeling of American English /r/. In: Proceedings of Eurospeech, Vol. 1, September 1997, Rhodes, Greece, pp. 393-396.
12. Fant, G., 1960. Acoustic Theory of Speech Production. Mouton, The Hague.
13. Fisher, R.A., 1925. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh, p. 4.
14. Guenther, F.H., Espy-Wilson, C.Y., Boyce, S.E., Matthies, M.L., Zandipour, M., Perkell, J.S., 1998. Articulatory tradeoffs reduce acoustic variability during American English /r/ production. Boston University Technical Report CAS/CNS-98-002.
15. Hagiwara, R., 1995. Acoustic realizations of American /R/ as produced by women and men. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 90, 1-187.
16. Hashi, M., Westbury, J.R., Honda, K., in press. Vowel posture normalization. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer.
17. Henke, W.L., 1966. Dynamic Articulatory Model of Speech Production Using Computer Simulation. MIT Doctoral thesis, Boston, MA.
18. Hockett, C.F., 1958. A Course in Modern Linguistics. Macmillan, New York.
19. Honda, K., Maeda, S., Hashi, M., Dembowski, J.S., Westbury, J.R., 1996. Human palate and related structures: Their articulatory consequences. In: Bunnell, H.T., Idsardi, W. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Spoken Language Processing, Philadelphia, 3-6 October 1996. Citation Delaware, New Castle, Delaware, pp. 784-787.
20. Johnson, K., Ladefoged, P., Lindau, M., 1993. Individual differences in vowel production. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 94, 701-714.
21. Kent, R.D., Kent, J.F., Rosenbeck, J.C., 1987. Maximum performance tests of speech production. J. Speech Hear. Dis. 52, 367-387.
22. Klatt, D.H., 1987. Review of text-to-speech conversion for English. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 82, 737-793.
23. Kuehn, D.P., Moll, K.L., 1976. A cineradiographic study of VC and CV articulatory velocities. J. Phonetics 4, 303-320.
24. Ladefoged, P., Maddieson, I., 1996. The Sounds of the World's Languages. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
25. Ladd, W.M., unpublished. A statistical examination of one aspect of /r/ articulation data. Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
26. Lindau, M., 1985. The story of /r/. In: Fromkin, V.A., (Ed.), Phonetic Linguistics: Essays in honor of Peter Ladefoged, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp. 157-168.
27. Lindblom, B., 1983. Economy of speech gestures. In: MacNeilage, P. (Ed.), The Production of Speech, Springer, New York, pp. 217-246.
28. Lindblom, B., 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In: Hardcastle, W., Marchal, A. (Eds.), Speech Production and Speech Modeling, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 403-439.
29. Lubker, J., 1981. Temporal aspects of speech production: Anticipatory labial coarticulation. Phonetica 38, 51-65.
30. Milenkovic, P., in review. Articulatory model for determining the vocal tract area function from point-parameterized data. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer.
31. Milenkovic, P., Read, C., 1992. C-Speech Version 4 User's Manual. University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
32. Munhall, K., Lofqvist, A., 1992. Gestural aggregation in speech: Laryngeal gestures. J. Phonetics 20, 111-126.
33. Perkell, J.S., 1990. Testing theories of speech production: Implications of some detailed analyses of variable articulatory data. In: Hardcastle, W., Marchal, A., (Eds.), Speech Production and Speech Modeling, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 263-288.
34. Perkell, J.S., Matthies, M.L., 1992. Temporal measures of anticipatory coarticulation for the vowel /u/: Within- and cross-subject variability. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 91, 2911-2925.
35. Perkell, J.S., Matthies, M.L., Svirsky, M.A., Jordan, M.I., 1993. Trading relations between tongue-body raising and lip rounding in production of the vowel [u]: A pilot "motor-equivalence study". J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 93, 2948-2961.
36. Russell, G.O., 1928. The Vowel: Its Physiological Mechanism as Shown by X-Ray. The Ohio State University Press, Columbus, OH.
37. Saltzman, E., Munhall, K., 1989. A dynamical approach to gestural patterning in speech production. Ecological Psych. 1, 333-382.
38. Shriberg, L.D., 1993. Four new speech and prosody-voice measures for genetic research and other studies in developmental phonological disorders. J. Speech Hear. Res. 36, 105-140.
39. Venables, W.N., Ripley, B.D., 1994. Modern Applied Statistics with S-Plus. Springer, New York.
40. Weismer, G., Kent, R.D., Hodge, M., Martin, R., 1988. The acoustic signature for intelligibility test words. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 84, 1281-1291.
41. Westbury, J.R., 1994a. X-ray Microbeam Speech Production Database User's Handbook. University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
42. Westbury, J.R., 1994b. On coordinate systems and the representation of articulatory movements. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 95, 2271-2273.
43. Yamada, R.A., Tohkura, Y., 1992. Perception of American English /r/ and /1/ by native speakers of Japanese. In: Tohkura, Y., Vatikiotis-Bateson, E., Sagisaka, Y. (Eds.), Speech Perception, Production, and Linguistic Structure. IOS Press, Burke, VA.
44. Zawadski, P.A., Kuehn, D.P., 1980. A cineradiographic study of static and dynamic aspects of American English /r/. Phonetica 37, 253-266.