Incidence and clinical significance of false-negative sextant prostate biopsies;Inzidenz und klinische bedeutung von falsch-negativen sextanten-biopsien der prostata

Urologe - Ausgabe A

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 660-

  Rabbani, F ^a   Stroumbakis, N ^a   Kava, B R ^a   Cookson, M S ^a   Fair, W R ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOPSY; HUMAN; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MALE; PATHOLOGY; PROSTATE; PROSTATE TUMOR;

BIOPSY; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; HUMANS; MALE; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 0032200703     PISSN: 03402592     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Keetch DW, Catalona WJ, Smith DS (1994) Serial prostatic biopsies in men with persistently elevated prostate specific antigen values. J Urol 151: 1571
2. Eskew LA, Bare RL, McCullough DL (1997) Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 157: 199
3. Levine MA, Ittman M, Melamed J, Lepor H (1998) Two consecutive sets of transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies of the prostate for the detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 159: 471
4. Vashi AR, Wojno KJ, Gillesie B, Oesterling JE (1998) A modell for the number of cores per prostate biopsy based on patient age and prostate gland volume. J Urol 159: 920