Reproducibility of histological grading of invasive breast carcinoma;Reproductibilite des grades histopronostiques des carcinomes invasifs du sein

Annales de Pathologie

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 385-390

  Jacquemier, J ^a   Apsud, Association ^b   Charpin, C ^c  

^a INSTITUT PAOLI CALMETTES   (France)

^b Liee par un Protocole d'Accord l'A

^c ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE HÔPITAUX DE MARSEILLE   (France)

Author keywords

Elston Ellis; Grade SBR; Reproducibility; Screening

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER GRADING; CANCER INVASION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MITOSIS INDEX; REPRODUCIBILITY; BREAST TUMOR; CASE CONTROL STUDY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY; PROGNOSIS;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROGNOSIS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0032199092     PISSN: 02426498     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. CONTESSO G, MOURIESSE H, FRIEDMAN S, GENIN J, SARRAZIN D, ROUESSE J. The importance of histologic grade in long-term prognosis of breast cancer: a study of 1.010 patients, uniformly treated at the Institut Gustave-Roussy. J Clin Oncol 1987; 5: 1378-86.
2. ELSTON CW, ELLIS IO. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 1991; 19: 403-10.
3. Recommandations européennes pour l'assurance de qualité dans le cadre du dépistage mammographique du cancer du sein. Rapport Des Anatomopathologistes du Groupe de Travail «Depistage du Cancer du Sein de l'Union européenne». Ann Pathol 1996; 16: 315-33.
4. FERMANIAN J. Mesure de l'accord entre deux juges. Cas qualitatif. Rev Epidém et Santé Publ 1984; 32: 140-47.
5. COHEN J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Measurement 1960; 20: 27-46.
6. e journées de la Société Française de Sénologie et de Pathologie Mammaire. Versailles: Evaluation des moyens de diagnostic du cancer du sein 1981: 173-85.
7. DELIDES GS, GARAS G, GEORGOULI G, JIORTZIOTIS D, LECCA J, LIVA T et al. Intralaboratory variations in the grade of breast carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1982; 106: 126-28.
8. THEISSIG F, KUNZE KD, HAROSKE G, MEYER W. Histological grade of breast cancer. Interobserver, reproducibility and prognostic significance. Path Res Pract 1990; 186: 732-36.
9. DALTON LW, PAGE DL, DUPONT Wd. Histologic grade of breast carcinoma. A reproducibility study. Cancer 1994; 73: 2765-70.
10. ROBBINS P, PINDER S, DE KLERK N, DAWKINS H, HARVEY J STERRETT G et al. Histological grading of breast carcinomas: a study of interobserver agreement. Hum Pathol 1995; 26: 873-79.
11. STENKVIST B, WESTMAN-NAESER S, VEGELIUS J, HOLMQUIST J, NORDIN B, BENGTSSON E et al. Analysis of reproducibility of subjective grading systems for breast carcinoma. J Clin Pathol 1979; 32: 979-85.
12. FRIERSON HF JR, WOLBER RA, BEREAN KW, FRANQUEMONT DW, GAFFEY MJ, BOYD JC et al. Interobserver reproducibility of the Nottingham modification of the Bloom and Richardon Histologic grade scheme for infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 1995; 103: 195-98.
13. NATIONAL COORDINATING GROUP FOR BREAST SCREENING PATHOLOGY, SLOANE JP, ELLMAN R, ANDERSON TJ, BROWN CL, COYNE J et al. Consistency of histopathological reporting of breast lesions detected by screening: finding of the U.K. National External Quality Assessment (EQA) scheme. Eur J Cancer 1994; 30: 1414-19.